Early treatment in patients with maloclusion class III
case series report
Introduction: There in the study of Class III malocclusion various terms, one of the most currently used is that described by Moyers, who described the class III molar relationship and anterior crossbite and also classified as Class III skeletal or true muscle or false teeth.
Materials and Methods: Patient selection for this study involves the evaluation of all patients seen in practice dentist consultation of Social Services at the Clinic of Pediatric Dentistry Level Undergraduate Faculty of Pediatric Dentistry of the Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosi patients had exhibited some features of development prognathism. He proceeded to place the resin in anterior teeth, and verification prior diganostico met the inclusion criteria.
Results: The patients modified their closure, reorientation of jaw closure, the first step of getting bitten up edge to edge occlusion redirected.
Discussion: Basically, interceptive treatment of malocclusion Pseudo Class III, the challenge is directed to the reorientation of jaw closure, removal of occlusal contacts and the correction of maxillo-mandibular.
Conclusion: The changes facial, dental and skeletal cephalometric measurements were based on, and clinical observations of patients seeking treatment are more conservative, less processing time in an office visit and no risk of open bite problem.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Nacional de Odontología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
(1) Carbone IL. Tratamiento temprano de las maloclusiones sin aparatologia funcional: presentación de dos casos clínicos. Int. J. Odontostomat. 2014, 8(2): 253-260.
(2) Heinrich CK. A practical bite plane for use with fixed appliances. J Clin Orthod. 1993; 27: 508-10.
(3) Philippe J. Treatment of deep bite with bonded bite planes. J Clin Orthod. 1996; 30: 396-400.
(4) Vesse M. Traitement precoce de la classe III, les justifications theoriques et cliniques. Rev. Orthop. Dento. Faciale, 37(3):305-28, 2003.
(5) Yoon-Young K, Insan J, Bong-Kuen C. Functional evaluation of orthopedic and orthodontic treatment in a patient with unilateral posterior crossbite and facial asymmetry. Korean J Orthod. 2014; 44 (3): 143-53.
(6) Raymond, J. L. Finalit. fonctionnelle et occlusale du traitement orthop.dique de classe III. Rev. Orthop. Dento Faciale, 37(3):285-303, 2003.
(7) Sanborn RT. Differences Between the facial skeletal patterns of class II and normal occlusion. Angle Orthodod. 1995; 25: 2208-22
(8) Kerr W, Miller S, Dawber J. Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics? Br J Orthod. 1992; 19: 21-4.
(9) Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux C, Schuster G. Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 27-38.
(10) D'Attilio M, Caputi S, Epifania E, Festa F, Tecco S. Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III. Cranio. 2005; 23: 219-228.
(11) Toffol LD, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(3): 561-73
(12) Bailey LJ, Proffit WR, White Jr RP. Trends in surgical treatment of Class III skeletal relationships. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1995; 10: 108-118
(13) Poggi I. Procedimiento indirecto para la realización de pistas directas del Dr. Planas. RelUCEDDU. 2015; (6): 33-6
(14) Graber T, Rakosi T, Petrovic A. Ortopedia dentofacial con aparatos funcionales. 2da. Edición: Mosby; 1997.
(15) Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with Class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73: 136-45.
(16) Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Sandvik L, Espeland L. Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal class III malocclusion: stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: 80-89
(17) Tsai IM, Lin CH, Wang YC. Correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular Complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141: 219-227
(18) Costa F, Robiony M, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 2001; 16: 179-192
(19) Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevensond M. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 300-309
(20) Poggi I. Procedimiento indirecto para la realización de pistas directas del Dr. Planas. RelUCEDDU. 2015; (6): 33-6
(21) Graber T, Rakosi T, Petrovic A. Ortopedia dentofacial con aparatos funcionales. 2da. Edición: Mosby; 1997.
(22) Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with Class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73: 136-45.
(23) Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Sandvik L, Espeland L. Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal class III malocclusion: stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: 80-89
(24) Tsai IM, Lin CH, Wang YC. Correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular Complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141: 219-227
(25) Costa F, Robiony M, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 2001; 16: 179-192
(26) Johnston C, Burden D, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevensond M. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 300-309
