Research Articles

Evaluation of the distribution of efforts of an immediate restoration supported in three phases of healing

Finite element analysis

Vol. 15 No. 28 (2019)
Published: 2019-04-22
Mauricio Alejandro Rodríguez López
Samuel David Giraldo Gómez
Federico Latorre Correa
Junes Abdul Villarraga Ossa
Juan Gustavo Diosa Peña
Introduction: to evaluate the distribution of von Mises stress in implant-supported restorations, with a temporary pillar of Peek and one of titanium, in three stages of healing (zero day, 1.5 months and 3 months). These evaluations were carried out bfem) method.
 
Methods: A Tapered Screw-Vent® implant (ref .: TSVB10 Zimmer Dental) of 13 mm length by 3.7 mm diameter was modeled with a 3.5 mm platform, a Peek abutment, a titanium abutment, a screw, a crown
Pmma of an upper central incisor, a cortical and spongy bone with different densities depending on the stage of healing; the Solid Works 2010 cad Software was used, processed and analyzed through the ansys
Software version 14. The von Mises stress distribution was evaluated, applying oblique loads with a magnitude of 200N.
 
Results: the concentration of stress in the apical spongy bone is 10 times greater on day zero than in the
other moments of healing. The models of abutments in peek at the time 1.5 and 3 months showed almost two times greater efforts in the implant than the models in titanium; similar values wer e observed von Mises when comparing the moment 1.5 and 3 months.
 
Conclusions: on the zero day of healing the greatest amount of effort is concentrated in the apical portion of the cancellous bone, the Peek pillars transmit more effort to the implant screw, the crestal bone formation helps a better distribution of the stress in the system.
Keywords: Array

How to Cite

Evaluation of the distribution of efforts of an immediate restoration supported in three phases of healing: Finite element analysis. (2019). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 15(28). https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-4607.2019.01.06

Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 211-217.

Stanford CM. Application of oral implants to the general dental practice [published correction appears in JADA 2005; 136(10): 1372]. JADA 2005; 136(8): 1092-100.

Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. 199-209 p.

Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone- dental implant interface. Clinical Materials. 1992; 10: 153-201.

Wazen RM. Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone–implant interfaces. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013; 9: 6663-6674. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.014

Eskitascioglu G. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 144-50. doi: 10.1016/S0022391303007418

Caglar A. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Titanium and Yttrium-Stabilized Zirconium Dioxide Abutments and Implants. Internacional Journal of Oral and Maxilofacial Implants. 2011; 26(5).

Peixoto HE. The role of prosthetic abutment material on the stress distribution in a maxillary single implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Materials Science and Engineering. 2016; 65(1): 90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.004

Rae PJ. The mechanical properties of poly (ether-ether-ketone) (Peek) with emphasis on the large compressive strain response. Polymer. 2007; 48: 598e615.

Koutouzis T, Richardson J, Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantology. 2011; 37: 174-82. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00102.1

Murakami N, Wakabayashi N. Finite element contact analysis as a critical technique in dental biomechanics: A review. J Prosthodont Research. 2014; 58:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.001

Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2014; (4): 200-203.

Kurniawan D, Nor FM, Lee HY, Lim JY. Finite element analysis of bone–implant biomechanics: refinement through featuring various osseointegration conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 41(9): 1090-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.026

Vanegas-Acosta JC, Landinez PNS, Garzón Alvarado DA, Casale RMC. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2011; 101: 297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.007

Sanz M, Vignoletti F. Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: from myth to reality. Periodontology 2000. 2014; 66: 132-152. doi: 10.1111/prd.12044

Roldán Valencia FM, Escobar Restrepo JC, Latorre Correa F. Análisis lineal y no lineal de los esfuerzos en pilares de circonio preformados. Elementos finitos. Revista Ingeniería Biomédica. 2014; 8(16): 39-50.

Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J ProsthodonticDentistry. 2004; 91(4): 319–25.

A multi-attachment approach to partial dentures. Sterngold attachments. [Internet]. [Consultado 24 de junio de 2016]. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304000332

Schwitalla AD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of Peek dental implants on the peri-implant bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015; 48: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017

Steven M, Kurtza B, John N, Devine. Peek biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 4845-4869.

Ridwan-Pramana A. Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty. A finite element study. J Craniomaxillofac Surgery. 2016; (44): 34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.014

Alkan I. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J ProsthodonticDentistry. 2004; 91(4): 319-25.

Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín E, Figuero M, Sanz M. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 26(8): 964-82. doi: 10.1111/clr.12428

Esposito M. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5

Neumann EA. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28(1): 1-5

MÉTRICAS
ARTICLE VIEWS: 946
PDF VIEWS: 637

Most read articles by the same author(s)