Research Articles

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Ability of Adhesive Systems

Vol. 9 No. 17 (2013)
Published: 2013-12-30
Giancarlo García Castillo
Génesis Ferrand Peña
Patricia Grau Grullón

Introduction: The aim of this research was to evaluate the antimicrobial ability of adhesive systems and to study the relationship between acidity and the antimicrobial ability of conventional adhesive systems and self-etching adhesive systems and acid etching.

Methods: Two conventional adhesive systems were used, Adper™ Single Bond 2 and OptiBond™ S, along with two self-etching systems, Scotchbond™ Universal and OptiBond™ All-In-One systems, as well as two acid etching systems, etch-37™ and select hv™ etch w / bac. For this experiment, an agar diffusion test was performed using three bacteria, Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei and Actinomyces odontolyticus, to measure the inhibition zone of the substances studied. The pH of those substances was also evaluated.

Results: The acid etchings showed the highest inhibition zones against the three bacteria as well as lower pH values than those of the self-etching adhesive systems, followed by conventional adhesive systems, which showed the lower halos or demonstrated no antimicrobial ability against certain bacteria.

Conclusions: The acid etchings and self-etching adhesive systems were found to have greater antimicrobial activity than conventional adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei and Actinomyces odontolyticus. It was also found that the more acidic the substances studied were, the greater their antimicrobial ability.

Keywords: Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

How to Cite

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Ability of Adhesive Systems. (2013). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 9(17), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.16925/od.v9i17.582

Imazato S. Bio-active restorative materials with antibacterial effects: new dimension of innovation in restorative dentistry. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28(1): 11-9.

Cardoso Espejo L, Lorenzetti Simianoto MR, Pereira Barroso L, Garone Neto N, Alves De Cerqueira LM. Evaluation of three different adhesive systems using a bacterial method to develop secondary caries in-Vitro. Am J Dent. 2010; 23: 93-7.

Sampath PB, Hedge MN, Hedge P. Assessment of antibacterial properties of newer dentin bonding agents: An in-Vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011; 2(3): 165-9.

Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Ebisu YT, Peters MC. In-Vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent Mater J. 2006; 22, 527-532.

Slutzky H, Matalon S, Weiss EI. Antibacterial surface properties of polymerized single-bottle bonding angents: part II. Quint Int. 2004; 35(4): 275-9.

Türkün LS, Ates M, Türkün M, Uzer E. Antibacterial activity of two adhesive systems using various microbiological methods. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 315-20.

Lobo MM, Gonçalves RB, Pimenta LAF, Bedran-Russo AK, Pereira PNR. In vitro evaluation of caries inhibition promoted by self-etching adhesive systems containing antibacterial agents. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 75(1): 122-7.

Hedge MN, Hedge P, Shetty V, Sampath PB. Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11(4): 150-3.

Korkmaz Y, Ozalp M, Attar N. Comparizon of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; (9)7: 57-64.

Gutiérrez Riquelme P, Monsalves Bravo S, Garrido González R, Yévenes López I, Badar Matter M. Estudio comparativo in-Vitro del pH de los sistemas adhesivos autograbantes presentes en el mercado nacional. Rev Dent Chile. 2012; 103(2): 14-22.

MÉTRICAS
ARTICLE VIEWS: 1297
PDF VIEWS: 827

Most read articles by the same author(s)