Research Articles

Evaluation of micromovements at the bone-implant interface with immediate loading

Analysis of finite elements

Vol. 13 No. 25 (2017)
Published: 2017-06-13
Ronald Oswaldo Velásquez Paz
Samuel David Giraldo Gómez
Federico Latorre Correa
Junes Abdul Villarraga Ossa
Juan Gustavo Diosa Peña
Introduction: The purpose of this research was to evaluate micromovements at the bone-implant interface using a provisional polyetheretherketone (peek) abutment and a polymethyl methacrylate (pmma) crown subjected to immediate loading, in order to establish whether these micromovements can impair implant osseointegration under normal loads. This evaluation was carried out through the finite element analysis (fem) method.
 
Methods: A 13 mmL, 3.7 mmD Tapered Screw-Vent® implant (ref. (tsvb10 Zimmer Dental) was modeled with a 3.5 mm platform, a peek abutment, a screw, and a pmma crown of an upper central incisor. A cortical bone and a cancellous bone were modeled using Solid Works 2010 computer-aided design (cad) software (Solid Works Corp., Concord, Massachusetts, United States), and then processed and analyzed by the ansys 14.0 software. Micromovements at the bone-implant interface were evaluated by applying loads obliquely
with a force of 200 Newtons on the palatal surface of the upper central incisor.
 
Results: The cancellous and cortical bones showed micromovements with similar values (31.57 and
32.88 μm, respectively).
 
Conclusions: The maximum micromovements occurred at the level of the implant neck. However, the high-density bone is prepared to receive implants with immediate loading without jeopardizing the osseointegration process.
Keywords: Array, Array, Array, Array

How to Cite

Evaluation of micromovements at the bone-implant interface with immediate loading: Analysis of finite elements. (2017). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 13(25). https://doi.org/10.16925/od.v13i25.1882

Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. p.199-209.

Strub JR, Jurdzik BA, Tuna T. Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:704-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02315.x

Testori T, Meltzer A, Del Fabbro M, Zuffetti F, Troiano M, Francetti L, et al.Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in the lower edentulous jaw. A multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:278-84.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01013.x

Becker M, Kaiser D. Guidelines for splinting implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84:210-4. http://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108672.

Gross M D. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:(1 Suppl):S60-S68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00043.x

Brunsky J. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update. 1993;4(10):76-81.

Peixoto HE, Bordin D, Del Bel Cury A, Da Silva W, Faot F. The role of prosthetic abutment material on the stress distribution in a maxillary single implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;6590-6.

Shariq N, Muhammad S, Zohaib K, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. JProsthodont Res. 2016;60:12-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001

Hasan I, Röger B, Heinemann F, Keilig L, Bourauel C. Influence of abutment design on the success of immediately loaded dental implants: experimental and numerical studies. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:817-25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.023

Dammak M, Shirazi-Adl A, Zukor DJ. Analysis of cementless implants using interface nonlinear friction - experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech. 1997;30:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00110-8

Tissakht M, Eskandari H, Ahmed A M. Micromotion analysis of the fixation of total knee tibial component. Computers& Structures. 1995;56:365-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00029-G

Vicenconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baliani M, Cristofolini L. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone–implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. JBiomech. 2000;33(12):1611-8

Roldán FM, Escobar J, Latorre F. Análisis lineal y no lineal de los esfuerzos en pilares de circonio preformados. Elementos finitos.Revista Ingeniería Biomédica. 2014;8:39-50

Kurniawan D, Nor FM, Lee HY, Lim JY. Finite element analysis of bone-implant biomechanics: refinement through featuring various osseointegration conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(9):1090-1096

Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J ProsthodonticDentistry. 2004;91(4):319-25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.016

A multi-attachment approach to partial dentures. Sterngold attachments. [Internet]. [consultado 2016 junio 24]. Disponible en: http://www.sterngold.com/Sterngold/Docs/copingscolor.pdf

Fuentemayor F, Payares F. Definición de malla óptima en refinamiento H-Adaptativo para múltiples casos de carga. Mecánica Computacional. 2002;21:3060-75.

Niinomi N. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys.Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;243(1-2):231-6. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X

Lin D, Li O, Li W, Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mechbehav Biomed Mat. 2009; 2, 410-32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.11.007

Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015;48:1-7 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017

Ridwan-Pramana A. Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty. A finite element study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:34-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.014

O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:648-57. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x

Sugiura T. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Jun;46(3):152-65. ttps://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016;46(3):152-65.

Szmukler M. Timing of Loading and Effect of Micromotion on Bone–Dental Implant Interface: Review of Experimental Literature. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 1998;43:192-203.

Vandamme K, Naert I, Geris L, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Duyck J. The effect of micromotion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007;115(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00416.x

Soballe K. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res. 1992;10(2):285-99. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100100216

Pillar RM. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1986;208:108-13.

Huang HL, Fuh LJ, Hsu JT, Tu MG, Shen YW, Wu CL. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:283-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01817.x

MÉTRICAS
ARTICLE VIEWS: 1849
PDF VIEWS: 636

Most read articles by the same author(s)