Success and challenges in apical surgery
strategiesfor optimal results
Introduction: The relevance of this report lies in its detailed approach to the clinical management of a complex periapical lesion, illustrating the challenges and strategies employed to achieve a successful outcome. Furthermore, it provides updated information on surgical techniques, materials, and important considerations in the treatment of endodontic pathologies.
Case report: A 62-year-old man was referred in June 2023 due to a radiolucent area at the apex of his right upper lateral incisor. After a thorough clinical history, involvement of two teeth was identified: a previously treated canine and an extensive lesion on the lateral incisor. Retreatment was performed on the canine, followed by disinfection and obturation. Purulent debris was identified in the lateral incisor, and the canal was disinfected and a temporary filling placed. After 15 days, the infection persisted, leading to a subsequent apicoectomy. The surgical procedure allowed for adequate visualization and access, followed by precise root-end instrumentation and retrograde sealing with Biodentine®. After suturing, the patient had a satisfactory recovery, with no symptoms at the follow-up visit in January 2024, confirming the success of the treatment.
Discussion: The importance of ensuring adequate coronal sealing after endodontic treatment and the need to consider retreatment in cases of persistent symptoms are emphasized. Furthermore, the importance of detailed knowledge of root anatomy for treatment success is stressed. Periapical surgery is presented as a viable option in selected cases, highlighting the promising use of materials such as Biodentine® in apical surgery. The crucial importance of precise retrograde sealing and the consideration of anatomical contraindications for apical surgery are emphasized. It is also noted that most periapical lesions respond favorably to non-surgical treatment, and the key role of bioceramic cement in the repair of these lesions is highlighted.
Conclusion: Apical surgery, although considered a last resort, has improved thanks to advances in techniques and materials. Its effectiveness as an alternative to tooth extraction is emphasized. However, longer follow-up periods are necessary to fully assess the treatment success.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Nacional de Odontología

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
[1] Torra-Moneny M, Izquierdo-Gómez K, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jané Salas E, Marí-Roig A, López-López J. Cirugía periapical y regeneración: Revisión Sistemática. Avances en Odontoestomatología. 2023;39(5).
[2] Alghamdi F, Alhaddad AJ, Abuzinadah S. Healing of Periapical Lesions After Surgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2020;12(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6916
[3] Thomas AR, Mathew M, Nettemu SK, et al. Resective and Regenerative Approach for an Unresolved Periapical Lesion: A Surgical Case Report With 24-Month Follow-Up. Cureus. 2023;15(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49717
[4] Wei X, Du Y, Zhou X, et al. Expert consensus on digital guided therapy for endodontic diseases. International Journal of Oral Science. 2023;15:54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00261-0
[5] Chercoles-Ruiz A, Sanchez-Torres A, Gay-Escoda C. Endodontics, Endodontic Retreatment, and Apical Surgery Versus Tooth Extraction and Implant Placement: A Systematic Review. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.004
[6] Yasin-Ertem S, Altay H, Hasanoglu-Erbasar N. The evaluation of apicectomy without retrograde filling in terms of lesion size localization and approximation to the anatomic structures. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal. 2019;24(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22834
[7] Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Christiansen R, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Periapical Bone Healing after Apicectomy with and without Retrograde Root Filling with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A 6-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Endodontics. 2016;42(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.011
[8] Ahmed HMA, Hashem AA. Accessory roots and root canals in human anterior teeth: a review and clinical considerations. International Endodontic Journal. 2015;48(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12508
[9] Maru V, Dixit U, Patil RSB, et al. Cytotoxicity and Bioactivity of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Bioactive Endodontic Type Cements: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021;14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1880
[10] Falkowska J, Chady T, Dura W, et al. The Washout Resistance of Bioactive Root-End Filling Materials. Materials. 2023;16:5757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175757
[11] Almansour MI. Surgical endodontic treatment of maxillary incisors: Case report. Clinical Case Reports. 2023;11:e06884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.6884
[12] Setzer FC, Kratchman SI. Present status and future directions: Surgical endodontics. International Endodontic Journal. 2022;55(Suppl. 4):1020–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13783
[13] Angerame D, De Biasi M, Lenhardt M, et al. Root-end resection with or without retrograde obturation after orthograde filling with two techniques: A micro-CT study. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2022;00:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12634
[14] Abu Hasna A, Santos DP, Gavlik de Oliveira TR, et al. Apicoectomy of Perforated Root Canal Using Bioceramic Cement and Photodynamic Therapy. International Journal of Dentistry. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6677588
[15] Abou ElReash A, Hamama H, Comisi JC, Zaeneldin A, Xiaoli X. The effect of retrograde material type and surgical techniques on the success rate of surgical endodontic retreatment: systematic review of prospective randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01731-9




