Evaluation of the psychometric reproducibility properties of the Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ) 11-14
Introduction: There are different instruments that measure quality of life related to oral health in children, such as the CPQ, which has two versions (CPQ8-10 and CPQ11-14). Objective: The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Peruvian version of CPQ11-14 to the language of the Colombian Caribbean, determine the psychometric properties of reproducibility, and describe the usefulness of the CPQ11-14 questionnaire.
Materials and methods: With a sample of 214 participants, in this quantitative observational psychometric scale evaluation study, measurements of reliability, internal consistency, and discriminant power of the CPQ11-14 were performed. The structure of the instrument was explored by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). With factor extraction via the Principal Axis Method with Varimax rotation.
Results: A global Cronbach's alpha of 0.9 was obtained. For the EFA, the measure of sampling adequacy was evaluated with the KMO test = 0.829 (p = 0.001), and the mean adequacy of the sample with the Bartlett test = 2904.538 (p = 0.001). These values allowed for the calculation of factor loadings to justify each item in the dimensions of the scale.
Conclusions: This version of the instrument showed an adequate response to reproducibility, however, the low percentages of success in the discriminant power and some null factor loadings in some items suggest changes in the wording and a new evaluation to study their behavior. However, this version of the instrument is described as useful for this purpose, although it is not the definitive version to perform CVrSO measurements in children and adolescents on the Colombian Caribbean coast.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Nacional de Odontología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
(1) Baiju RM, Peter E, VargheseO, Sivaram N, Remadevi. OHLQ: Current Concepts. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 11. ZE21-ZE26. 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25866.10110 .
(2) Luján-Tangarife, Cardona-Arias. Construcción y validación de escalas de medición en salud: revisión de propiedades psicométricas. ARCH MED. 2015; 11(31). doi: https://doi.org/10.3823/1251 .
(3) Gómez C, Sánchez R. Conceptos básicos sobre validación de escalas. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 1998; 27:121-30.
(4) RM Baiju EP, Varghese N, Remadevi S. Oral Health and Quality of Life: Current Concepts. J Clin Diagn Res. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25866.10110 .
(5) Parra S, Paola A. Factores que afectan la calidad de vida en los niños. Universidad de la sabana. Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia; 2012. Recuperado de: https://hdl.handle.net/10818/1677
(6) Gilchrist F, Rodd H, Deery C, Marshman Z. Assessment of the quality of measures of child oral health-related quality of life. BMC Oral Health; 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-40
.
(7) International Test Commission. The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition); 2017. Recuperado de: www.InTestCom.org
(8) Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B and Guyatt G. Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire for Measuring Child Oral-health-related Quality. JDR. 2002; 81 (7): 459-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100705
(9) Locker D, Jokovic A, Tompson B, Prakash P. Is the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11-14-year olds sensitive to clinical and self-perceived variations in orthodontic status? CDOE; 2007, 35: 179-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00324 .
(10) Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11–14-year-old children (CPQ11–14): Development and initial evaluation. HQLO, 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-4 .
(11) García AD, Pineda JL, Duque JA, Chaparro D. Validez y confiabilidad de la versión peruana del child perceptions questionarie en escolares de colegios oficiales de Floridablanca. [Trabajo de pregrado para optar por el título de odontología]. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bucaramanga; 2017.
(12) Abanto J, Albites U, Bönecker M, Martins-Paiva S, Castillo JL, Aguilar Gálvez D. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the child perceptions questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14) for the peruvian spanish language. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 18(6): e832–e838. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18975.
(13) McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 1996.
(14) Argimon JM, Jiménez Villa J. Métodos de investigación clínica y epidemiología, 4a ed., Elsevier, Barcelona, España; 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.04.002 .
(15) Ramada Rodilla J, Serra-Pujadas C, Delclos G. Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Pública de México. 2013; 55: 57-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342013000100009 .
(16) Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades Psicométricas de una Escala: la Consistencia Interna. Rev. salud pública. 2008; 10 (5):831-839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642008000500015
(17) Campo Arias A, Herazo E, Celina Oviedo H. Análisis de factores: fundamentos para la evaluación de instrumentos de medición en salud mental. Rev. Colombina de Psiquiatría. 2012; 41(3): 468-708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60036-6
(18) Pérez E, Medrano L. Análisis factorial exploratorio: Bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC). 2010; 2(1): 58-66. 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v2.n1.15924
(19) Lloret Segura S, Ferreres Traver A, Hernández Baeza A, Tomás Marco I. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de psicología; 2014; 30 (3): 1151-1169. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361.
(20) Marjorie A, Pett NL, Lackey JJ, Sullivan. Making of sense of factor analyisis. The use of factor analysis por instrument development in health care research. Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
(21) Anna B, Costello J, Osborne W. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. 2007; 10(7). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8.
(22) Mavrou I. Análisis factorial exploratorio: Cuestiones conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas. 2015; 19, 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.26378/rnlael019283 .
(23) Cardona AD, Agudelo HB. Construcción cultural del concepto calidad de vida. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública. 2005; 23(1):79-90. doi: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12023108 .
(24) Santhosh K, Jeroen K, Ratilal L, Newell WJ. Psychometric Properties of Translation of the Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ11-14) in Telugu Speaking Indian Children. PLoS ONE. 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149181 .
(25) Ventura-León JL, Caycho-Rodríguez T. El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud. 2017; 15(1):625-627. doi: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77349627039.
(26) Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM. Psychosocial impact of malocclusion in Spanish adolescents. 2013; Korean J Orthod. 43: 193–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.4.193.
(27) Carvajal A, Centeno C, Watson R, Martínez M, Sanz Rubiales Á. ¿Cómo validar un instrumento de medida de la salud? 34(1): 63-72. Anales Sis San Navarra. 2019. doi: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S113766272011000100007&lng=es.
