COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE DEGREES IN CEROMER AND CERAMICS INLAYS. AN IN-VITRO STUDY
Introduction: ceromer and ceramic inlays give any type of marginal microleakage, so we want to establish the marginal microleakage degree of ceromer and ceramic inlays from a study carried out by Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia in 2010, showing advantages for a professional regarding production, cementation, comfort, function and duration to the patient.
Materials and methods: 40 human teeth were used, specifically third upper and lower molars split by two groups A and B. Samples were thermo-cycled, sealed, coated and dye incorporation, cuts in ceramic isomet, cuts in ceromer isomet, and a frame digitized in tideland-microscope measured by micrometers in dye incorporation (methylene blue).
Result: there is not any significant difference (P= 0.3912) according to Miller et al’s scale, but based on a micrometric analysis we did not find a significant difference (P= 0.101). By reviewing individually data we found that ceramic inlays (2,147.3 um) of affected area length and ceromer inlays got a major microleakage (2,416.6 um).
Conclusion: ceramic inlays present a minor microleakage degree compared with ceromer inlays according to Miller’s measurement scale and the micrometer analysis carried out on study samples although there is not a relevant significance in the study from a statistical perspective.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Hayashi M, Yeung CA. Incrustaciones cerámicas para la restauración de dientes posteriores. En: La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus. 2008; 4. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. [internet] [acceso el 4 de mayo del 2010]. Disponible en: http://www.update-software.com
Philips RW. La ciencia de los materiales dentales de Skinner. Incrustaciones cerámicas para la restauración de dientes posteriores. México: Interamericana; 2008.
Anusavice, Kenneth DMD. Philips La ciencia de los biomateriales dentales. Madrid: Elsevier; 2004.
Miller MB, Castellanos IR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of restorative materials of class II composites. J of EsthetDent. 1996; 8: 107-113.
Joktad A, Mjör IA. Ten years’ clinical evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent. 1996; 24: 309-15.
Bertoldi AH. Incrustaciones cerámicas. Consideraciones generales. Revista Asociación Odontológica Argentina RAOA. 2004: 3(6): 37-41.
Henostroza G. Estética en odontología restauradora. Madrid: Ripano; 2006.
Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 412-417.
Joktad, A, Mjör IA. Ten years’ clinical evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent. 1996; 24: 309-15.
