An Investigation of the cultural intelligence of pre-service music teachers in Turkish Universities
Culture constitutes all the values of a society; they are all the building blocks that can be transferred, renewed, and come from the past to the present. Turkey is a diverse, rich and culturally diverse country. In today's world, the concept of cultural intelligence, which is necessary for people to adapt in different and multicultural environments is substantial. In this context, it is extremely important for music teachers to adapt in multicultural environments for their efficient work. This purpose of this study is to investigate of pre-service music teachers’ cultural intelligence and to determine by some variables whether differ or not. This study was conducted with quantitative research methods. Descriptive analysis, Independent Group t-test, One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal Wallis-H Test, Pearson Correlation Coefficient were used. In study, which was carried out with quantitative research, 278 participants who study at seven various regions of Turkey in the 2020-2021 academic year. It has been determined that the cultural intelligence levels are at a good level and the relations between them are positive. Cultural intelligence levels of participants do not differ significantly by the gender, age, university, parents' education status. Solely it was found statistically significant whether there was someone involved in music in the family in metacognition and cognition sub-dimensions. As a result, it was seen that the cultural intelligence levels of the pre-service music teachers were good and generally did not differ according to demographic variables. The novelty of this study is that the framework has identified preservice music teachers’ cultural intelligence levels in Turkey. Furthermore, this study can be a point of reference to stakeholders and researchers on this music education axis. The findings of this study also serve to foresee education sector about the issues related to the implementations of higher institutions of teacher educations.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rastros Rostros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ética. La revista y su equipo editorial propiciarán, a través de sus políticas y actuaciones, la ética en los procesos de investigación, el uso apropiado de los contenidos protegidos por derechos de autor y la calidad de los trabajos que publica, de manera que los diferentes colaboradores (editores, autores y evaluadores) interactúen bajo principios de integridad académica.
- Autores. Se espera que los autores que participen en la revista presenten textos originales, de su propia creación, derivados de procesos de investigación rigurosos, que no hayan sido previamente publicados, usen de manera adecuada las fuentes que sirven de soporte bibliográfico y cualquier otro material que esté protegido por derechos de autor. Los textos también deben estar escritos de manera cuidadosa y considerando los requisitos de forma y citación que correspondan al estilo de la revista.
- Evaluadores. Se espera que los evaluadores de la revista realicen una lectura minuciosa y constructiva de cada artículo que acepten revisar, buscando no sólo emitir una recomendación de aprobación o rechazo para el editor, sino que sus comentarios permitan que los autores mejoren sus textos o reflexionen sobre los alcances, posibilidades o falencias de su manuscrito. Asimismo, los evaluadores deben considerar que los textos que el editor les ha confiado son inéditos, y cualquier uso indebido o no autorizado de la información allí contenida implicaría una falta ética grave. También, la responsabilidad de evaluar un trabajo, una vez se ha aceptado, no puede ser transferida a terceros, en especial, si no se ha justificado y consultado previamente con el editor. Finalmente, cualquier conflicto de intereses que el evaluador identifique después de haber recibido un trabajo y que potencialmente menoscabe su independencia en la elaboración de un concepto debe informarse.
Notificación sobre casos. Si hay alguna evidencia de problemas éticos en las investigaciones que presentan los trabajos publicados por la revista, dudas sobre su rigor científico, sospecha de falsificación o manipulación indebida de datos, conflictos de intereses no revelados, identificación de publicaciones previas (“refritos”), problemas de autoría o plagio, pedimos, por favor, que se contacte de manera inmediata al editor de la revista para que pueda ahondar en el caso y tomar las acciones que correspondan. Las notificaciones que se reciban sobre problemas éticos se manejarán con absoluta confidencialidad, protegiendo la identidad de la persona que ha detectado el problema, si así lo solicita.
Retractaciones, correcciones y resolución de conflictos. La revista sigue los lineamientos (http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines) y procedimientos (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts) del Committee on Publication Ethics (cope) para el manejo de conductas inapropiadas en la publicación académica. Asimismo, se harán retractaciones o correcciones de artículos ya publicados cuyos contenidos presenten errores que afecten su calidad científica o el reconocimiento apropiado de sus autores, ya sea por equivocaciones involuntarias en el proceso de investigación y publicación o por problemas éticos serios como plagio, falsificaciones, manipulaciones de datos, entre otros.
Uso de los contenidos y autoarchivo. La revista publica sus contenidos en acceso abierto, sin que medie ningún periodo de embargo. Asimismo, todos los trabajos publicados aparecen bajo una licencia Creative Commons de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), y su uso debe hacerse bajo esas condiciones de licenciamiento.
Abaslı, K. & Polat, Ş (2019). Öğrencilerin kültürlerarası duyarlılık ve kültürel zekaya ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1),193-202.
Aksoy, Z. (2012). Uluslararası göç ve kültürlerarası iletişim. Journal of International Social Research, 5(20), 292-303.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K.Y., Templar, K. J. Tay & C. Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007) .Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgement and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335- 371.
Berry, J. W. & Ward, C. (2006). Commentary on ‘redefining interactions across cultures and organizations’. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 64-77,
Brislin, R., Worthley, R. & Macnab, B. (2006).Cultural intelligence: understanding behaviors that serve people’s goals. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 40-55.
Cocodia, E. A. (2014). Cultural perceptions of human intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 2(4), 180-196.
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B.& Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma Yöntemleri: Desen ve Analiz. Ankara: Anı.
Crowne, K. (2008). What leads to cultural intelligence?. Business Horizons, 41(5), 391-399.
Crowne, K. A. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence, and cultural intelligence. Organization Management Journal, 6, 148-163.
Demir, G. (2015). Kültürel zekâ ve tükenmişlik ilişkisi: Konaklama işletmelerinde bir araştırma.(Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
Doğutaş, A. (2015). Küreselleşen Dünyada Türk Öğretmen Adaylarının Kültürel Zekâ Seviyeleri. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 530-547.
Earley, P. C.& Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Earley, C. & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard Business School Review, 82(10), 139-146.
Ekinci, Ö. (2019). Ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin kültürel zekâ düzeyleri ile çokkültürlü yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Konya: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(1), 906-911.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.& Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Gardner, H. (1987). The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1), 19-35.
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J. & Wıseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International journal of intercultural relations, 27(4),421-443.
İlhan, M.& Çetin, B. (2014). Kültüre zekâ ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. [Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the cultural intelligence scale]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 94-114.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review,39, 1-123.
Johnson, J. P., Lenartowıcz, T., Apud, S. (2006). Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model. Journal of international business studies, 37(4), 525-543.
Karaelma, B., & Demirel, S. (2021). Çocuklarda Müziksel İşitme Algısı İçin Ölçek Geliştirme. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken. (13)1, 293-311.
Kartal, M. (2019). Beden eğitimi ve spor bölümü öğretmen adaylarının konuşma kaygısı ve kültürel zekâ arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Samsun: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Koçak, S. & Özdemir, M. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının çok kültürlü eğitime yönelik tutumlarında kültürel zekânın rolü. İlköğretim Online, 14(4),1352-1369.
Konate T. (2018). Yabancı öğrencilerin kültürel uyumunda kültürel zekanın etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Antalya.
Köse, N. (2016). Erasmus programının kültürel zekâ üzerine etkisinde demografik özelliklerin rolü. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi).
Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gaziantep.
Lee, L.& Sukoco, B. M. (2010). The effects of cultural intelligence on expatriate performance: The moderating effects of international experience. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(7), 963-981.
Mercan, N. (2016). Çokkültürlü ortamlarda kültürel zekânın kültürlerarası duyarlılık ile ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 1-13,
Moynıihan, L. M., Peterson R. S. & Earley P. C. (2006). Cultural intelligence and the multinational team experience: Does the experience of working in a multinational team improve cultural intelligence?. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 9(8), 299-323.
Nikoopour, J. & Esfandiarı, N. (2017). The relationship between emotional, social, cultural, spiritual Intelligence and EFL teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1),138-148,
Oolders, T., Chernyshenko, O. & Stark, S. (2008). Cultural intelligence as a mediator of relationships between openness to experience an adaptive performance S. Ang, & L. V. Dyne (Eds), Handbook of cultural intelligence in (p. 145- 158). New York: M. E Sharpe,
Özer Koçak, Y. (2020).Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının çokkültürlü eğitim tutumları ile kültürel zekâları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Nevşehir.
Petrović, D. S. (2011). How do teachers perceive their cultural intelligence? Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11,276-280,
Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond General intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 825-840.
Soltani, B.& Keyvanara, M. (2013).Cultural intelligence and social adaptability: A comparison between Iranian and non-Iranian dormitory students of isfahan university of medical sciences. Materia Socio-Medica, 25(1), 40-43,
Sternberg, R. J.& Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Sternberg, R. J. & Jensen, A. R. (1992). Can intelligence be increased? In B. Slife & J. Rubenstein (Eds.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial psychological issues in (p.144-165). Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J., Hsu, C. C. & Kitamura, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55.1-2.
Thomas, Davıd & C. Kerr Inkson. (2005). Cultural intelligence: People skills for a global workplace. Consulting to Management, 16(1), 5-9.
Triandıs, H. C. (2006). Cultural intelligence in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 20-26.
Verghese, T. D’netto. B. (2011). Cultural intelligence and openness: Essential elements of effective global leadership. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7, 191-200.
Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
