• Original Articles

    Academic Debate as a Didactic Strategy for the Training of Argumentative Skills and the Approach to Scientific Dialogue

    Vol. 19 No. 34 (2017)
    Published: 2017-12-12
    Stefany Carrillo García
    Karen Nevado Castellanos
    Introduction: This article derives from the research carried out in the classroom with a group of students who were in the first level of the undergraduate program Chemical Engineering at the Universidad Industrial de Santander in 2015. It aims to analyze the academic debate as a didactic alternative that allows to develop oral argumentative discursive strategies in students. Also, the promotion of scientific dialogue is studied
    as a social opportunity to reinforce critical and reflexive skills.
     
    Methodology: The action research conducted is oriented by a qualitative methodological approach for
    data application and analysis, taking as reference James McKernan’s postulates and Perelman and Olbrecht-Tyteca’ model theory of argumentation.
     
    Results: In this regard, from the diagnosis of an academic need, a didactic intervention plan in the classroom
    was designed for said university students, who participated in debates on topics related to their disciplinary field.
     
    Conclusions: The results show that a comprehensive training strategy is necessary for the development of epistemic operations and academic culture that require argumentative skills. In addition, specific learning, through genres, builds significant skills, but it must be an ongoing process that deserves more than one academic semester.
    Keywords: Array, Array, Array, Array

    How to Cite

    Carrillo García, S., & Nevado Castellanos, K. (2017). Academic Debate as a Didactic Strategy for the Training of Argumentative Skills and the Approach to Scientific Dialogue. Rastros Rostros, 19(34). https://doi.org/10.16925/ra.v19i34.2145

    Charaudeau, Patrick y Dominique Maingueneau. Diction-naire d’analyse du discours. Seuil, 2002.

    Corcelles Seuba, Mariona, et al. “Enseñar a escribir textos científico-académicos mediante la revisión colaborativa”. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, vol. 11, n.º 1, 2013.

    Gómez, Martha. “Análisis lingüístico y socio-pragmático de las fórmulas de tratamiento nominal en el Senado colombiano”. Rastros Rostros, vol. 18, n.° 33, 2016, pp. 9-25.

    Mina Paz, Álvaro. Humanismo y argumentación. Lineamientos metodológicos para la comprensión de la Teoría de la Argumentación. Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio, 2007.

    McKernan, James. Investigación-acción y curriculum. Métodos y recursos para profesionales reflexivos. Gredos, 1920.

    --. Investigación-acción y currículo. Morata, 2001.

    Monsalve, Alfonso. Teoría de la argumentación. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia, 1992.

    Perelman, Chaïm. El imperio retórico, retórica de la argumentación. Dalloz, 1977.

    Perelman, Chaïm y Lucie Olbrecht-Tyteca. Tratado de argumentación. La nueva retórica. Gredos, 1989.

    Toledo, María Isabel. “Calidad física y química de los alimentos para peces y su importancia en el cultivo de peces”. Depósito Documentos fao. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 2013, www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/ab482s/AB482S17.htm.

    Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Soulages, Jean Claude. Los imaginarios socioculturales a través del discurso publicitario. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 2004.

    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Investigaciones filosóficas. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, unam, 1988.

    MÉTRICAS
    ARTICLE VIEWS: 2429
    PDF VIEWS: 1831