Artículos de investigación

Fatores relacionados à Duração do Tratamento Ortodôntico no Programa de Graduação em Ortodontia

v. 13 n. 24 (2017)
Publicado: 2017-02-06
Óscar Zapata Noreña
Diana María Barbosa Liz
Álvaro Carvajal
Sonia Patricia Plaza Ruiz

Introdução: Estabelecer a relação entre a duração do tratamento ortodôntico e os
fatores educacionais/administrativos/clínicos em pacientes tratados e finalizados na clínica
de ortodontia da universidade. Métodos: Dados foram obtidos a partir de registros clínicos,
radiografias panorâmicas e modelagens dentárias finais de 40 pacientes tratados (21
mulheres e 19 homens), de 15,97 ± 5,79 anos. Variáveis administrativas incluíram número
de consultas atendidas, número de consultas por ano de tratamento, número total de consultas perdidas, total de meses de tratamento, número de meses efetivos de tratamento, número de residentes e instrutores atendendo aos pacientes e percentual de planejamento de tratamento para a próxima consulta. Variáveis clínicas incluíram a complexidade da maloclusão, a qualidade da finalização, extrações dentárias, idade e número de problemas e quebras de aplicações ortodônticas. Resultados: A média de duração do tratamento era de 55,5 ± 22,2 meses. Em pacientes com extrações dentárias, a duração do tratamento era significativamente mais longa (p=0,0231). Um modelo de regressão linear múltipla explicou 59% da variabilidade, identificando quatro variáveis significativas, duas relacionadas à administração (número de consultas perdidas e números de instrutores) e duas variáveis clínicas (número de problemas e quebras de aplicações ortodônticas e qualidade da finalização). Conclusão: Questões clínicas e administrativas significativas foram detectadas e
foi observado que o tempo excessivo de tratamento pode deteriorar os resultados clínicos
estáticos alcançados.

Palavras-chave: Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

Como Citar

Fatores relacionados à Duração do Tratamento Ortodôntico no Programa de Graduação em Ortodontia. (2017). Revista Nacional de Odontología, 13(24). https://doi.org/10.16925/od.v12i24.1655

Fisher MA, Wenger RM, Hans MG. Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2010; 137(2):178–86. doi: 10.1016 / j.ajodo.2008.09.028.

Parrish LD, Roberts WE, Maupome G, Stewart KT, Bandy RW, Kula KS. The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(2):192–7. doi: 10.2319/062210-341.1.

Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ, Cobb CM, Tira DE. An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;115(4):439–47. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70265-9

Zuccati G, Ghobadlu J, Nieri M, Clauser C. Factors associated with the duration of forced eruption of impacted maxillary canines: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(3):349–56. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.028

Ochi C, BeGole E. Associations between pretreatment ages and treatment time with orthodontic treatment outcome: a comparison by means of two orthodontic indices. Hell Orthod Rev. 2008; 11(1):9–20.

Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(2):230–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.003

Nanekrungsan K, Patanaporn V, Janhom A, Korwanich N. External apical root resorption in maxillary incisors in orthodontic patients: associated factors and radiographic evaluation. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Sep; 42(3):147–54. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.147

Julien KC, Buschang PH, Campbell PM. Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(4):641–7. doi: 10.2319/071712-584.1.

Naoumova J, Kurol J, Kjellberg H. A systematic review of the interceptive treatment of palatally displaced maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 33(2):143–9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq045.

Barbosa LD, Carvajal A, Franco CM, Astrid S, Aguirre R, Florez A et al. Resultado de Tratamientos Ortodóncicos y su Relación con la Complejidad de la Maloclusión. Int J Odontostomatol. 2014; 8(2):201–6.

Cameron DL. The relationship between American Board of orthodontics pretreatment dental cast discrepancy index scores and posttreatment dental cast objective grading system scores. [Thesis] Saint Louis. Saint Louis University; 2010.

Casko JS, Kokich VG, Cangialosi TJ. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentophacial Orthop. 1998; 14(5):589-99.

Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005; 128(5):624–9. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.017

Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrián R. Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006; 11(1):E88–93.

Hou HM, Wong R, Hägg U. The uses of orthodontic study models in diagnosis and treatment planning. Hong Kong Dent J. 2006; 3(2):107–15.

Gonzalez J, Buñuel JC, Gonzalez MP. Listas guía de comprobación de estudios observacionales: declaración STROBE. Evid Pediatr. 2012; 8(65):1–5.

Oliveira PG, Tavares RR, Freitas JC. Assessment of motivation, expectations and satisfaction of adult patients submitted to orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(2):81–7.

Dickens S, Beane RA, Caplan DJ, Vann W. Comparison of treatment result and compliance between private practice Medicaid and non-Medicaid orthodontic patients--a brief communication. J Public Health Dent. 2008; 68 (3):167–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00059.x

Vu CQ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK, Ofner S. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133 (1): 9.e1-9.e13 . doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.012.

Brown PN, Kulbersh R, Kaczynski R. Clinical outcomes assessment of consecutively finished patients in a 24-month orthodontic residency: a 5-year perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(5):665–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.036.

Cook DR, Harris EF, Vaden JL. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(6):707–12. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.014

Barrera RJ, Meza D HC. Evaluación de los tratamientos terminados en un posgrado de ortodoncia según los parámetros. Rev Latinoam Ortod y Odontopediatría. [en linea] 2014 July 21 [access date 31th August 2016 ]; 1–17. URL available in: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2014/art15.asp

Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. The time-factor in orthodontics: What influences the duration of treatments in National Health Service practices? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29(1):62-72. DOI: 10.1034 / j.1600-0528.2001.00010.x

Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK, Eckert GJ, Snyder RJ. Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmileTM method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(3):383–8. doi: 10.2319/071810-413.1.

Anthopoulou C, Konstantonis D, Makou M. Treatment outcomes after extraction and nonextraction treatment evaluated with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146(6):717–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.025.

Detterline DA, Isikbay SC, Brizendine EJ, Kula KS. Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(3):528–32. doi: 10.2319/060309-315.1.

Melo AC, Carneiro LO, Pontes LF, Cecim RL, Mattos JN, Normando D. Factors related to orthodontic treatment time in adult patients. Dental Press J. Orthod. [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2016 Aug 31] ; 18( 5 ): 59-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500011.

Schafer SM, Maupome G, Eckert GJ, Roberts WE. Discrepancy index relative to age, sex, and the probability of completing treatment by one resident in a 2-year graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(1):70–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.003.

Vig KW, Weyant R, Vayda D, O’Brien K, Bennett E. Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies--strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics. Clin Orthod Res. 1998; 1(2):147–55.

Saxe AK, Louie LJ, Mah J. Efficiency and effectiveness of SuraSmile. World J Orthod. 2010;11(1):16–22.

Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic Outcomes Assessment Using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71(3):164–9.

Janson G, Maria FR, Barros SE, Freitas MR, Henriques JF. Orthodontic treatment time in 2- and 4-premolar-extraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5):666–71. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.026

Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30(4):386–95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn018.

McGuinness NJ, McDonald JP. The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postgraduate teaching environment. Eur J Orthod.1998; 20 (2):159–67. DOI: http://aplicacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2141/10.1093/ejo/20.2.159

Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004; 126(5):533–43. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.017

MÉTRICAS
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO ARTIGO: 1445
VISUALIZAÇÕES DO PDF: 499

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)