International trade and sustainable development
a circular economy approach
Introduction: International trade faces a crucial challenge in achieving sustainable development, which drives the adoption of circular economy strategies. This transition optimizes resource use, minimizes waste, and reduces the environmental impact of global trade.
Problem: Despite its benefits, regulatory and technological barriers hinder the implementation of the circular economy in international trade, limiting its contribution to sustainability.
Objective: To analyse the relationship between international trade and the circular economy, identifying opportunities and challenges for global sustainability.
Methodology: A qualitative approach based on the review of academic literature and case studies was used, allowing for an in-depth exploration of the impact, limitations, and potential of circular economy strategies.
Results: The findings indicate that the circular economy reduces the environmental footprint of trade by optimizing resources, reusing materials, and minimizing waste. However, regulatory inconsistencies, technological gaps, and a lack of coordinated policies hinder large-scale adoption.
Conclusion: The transition to a circular economy in trade requires multilateral collaboration, robust regulatory frameworks, and public policies that foster sustainable innovation. Without these structural changes, a sustainable and resilient trading system will remain difficult to achieve.
Originality: This study explores the intersection between the circular economy and international trade, addressing gaps in policy and implementation research.
Limitations: The qualitative approach, while valuable for theoretical and policy analysis, does not include quantitative models of business or environmental impact.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ingeniería Solidaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cession of rights and ethical commitment
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Ingeniería Solidaría before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
[1] E. R. Aranibar-Ramos and A. D. Quispe-Ambrocio, “Exploración del comercio global: una revisión integral del comercio internacional y el comercio exterior,” Quipukamayoc, vol. 31, no. 66, pp. 85–100, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S1609-81962023000200085&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/quipu.v31i66.25573
[2] V. Alonso, “El comercio internacional de armamento y las ventajas comparativas,” RESI: Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 83–104, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8306039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18847/1.14.5
[3] OCDE, Emisiones de CO₂ en el comercio internacional: Una evaluación global, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264303015-es
[4] ONU Medio Ambiente, Impactos ambientales de la industria textil en Asia. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/28415
[5] CEPAL, Economía circular y desarrollo sostenible en América Latina. Naciones Unidas, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/46921
[6] L. Gómez and M. Rivas, “Innovación circular en el Corredor Seco Centroamericano,” Revista Latinoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 78–95, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15446/rlee.v15n2.91234
[7] C. C. Da Costa Pimenta, “La economía circular como eje de desarrollo de los países latinoamericanos,” Revista Economía y Política, no. 35, pp. 1–18, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?pid=S2477-90752022000100001&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n35.2022.01
[8] M. Almeida-Guzmán and C. Díaz-Guevara, “Economía circular, una estrategia para el desarrollo sostenible: avances en Ecuador,” Estudios de la Gestión, no. 8, pp. 35–57, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/7198/719877737010.pdf
[9] Comisión Europea, Directiva de ecodiseño 2025: Hacia productos más sostenibles, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0560
[10] A. Cerón Islas, R. J. Alcántara Hernández, H. Zapote Monroy, and H. Cerón Islas, “Comportamiento del consumidor post pandemia hacia el consumo de productos sustentables,” FACE: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 79–92, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v22i2.1331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v22i2.1331
[11] J. Torres, R. Pérez, and A. Silva, “Biocombustibles a partir de desechos vitivinícolas: experiencia chilena,” Revista Iberoamericana de Energías Renovables, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 45–60, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052021000300045
[12] M. Hernández and K. Schmidt, “Cooperación internacional en gestión de residuos plásticos: el caso Alemania–México,” Estudios de Economía Circular Global, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2023.
[13] N. Van Buren et al., “Pasaporte de materiales digitales: una herramienta para la transparencia comercial,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 298, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126785
[14] A. Castro Alfaro, “La contabilidad ambiental y su productividad científica a través de la bibliometría,” FACE: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v20i1.462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v20i1.462
[15] R. Eslava Zapata, H. A. Gonzalez Júnior, and E. Chacón Guerrero, “Clima organizacional en agencias de automóviles: Belo Horizonte, Brasil,” FACE: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v22i1.1474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v22i1.1474
[16] BIR, Informe global sobre reciclaje de residuos electrónicos. Bureau of International Recycling, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bir.org/publications/facts-figures/
[17] R. Fernández et al., “Impacto del Reglamento de Deforestación Cero en las exportaciones sudamericanas,” Revista de Derecho Ambiental, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 55–72, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15446/rda.v18n4.98765
[18] BID, Financiamiento para la economía circular en América Latina. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://publications.iadb.org/es/financiamiento-para-la-economia-circular
[19] FMI, Subsidios a combustibles fósiles: Tendencias y alternativas. Fondo Monetario Internacional, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/es/Publications/WP/Issues/2023/07/20/Global-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-536432
[20] M. E. D. L. Rosa Leal, “El enfoque de sostenibilidad en las teorías organizacionales,” Trascender, Contabilidad y Gestión, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 87–102, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2448-63882021000200087&script=sci_arttext DOI: https://doi.org/10.36791/tcg.v0i17.102
