The viability of cooperative societies from the anarchist- cybernetics perspective: a systematic review of the field and research opportunities

Camilo Osejo Bucheli

doi:10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.04

The viability of cooperative societies from the anarchist- cybernetics perspective : a systematic review of the field and research opportunities

Research Articles

https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.04

Camilo Osejo Bucheli Ver Biografía

Universidad de Nariño

Introduction: This article is part of an ongoing research project that started in 2022 and investigates the viability of cooperative associations from an anarchist-cybernetics perspective at the Universidad del Valle, Department of Administrative Sciences.

Problem: Management Cybernetics and anarchism are fields with significant coincidences regarding organisational theory. From the point of view of anarchism, voluntary organisation is a form of exercising individual freedom, while in cybernetics, autonomy is the desirable state of organisation.

Objective: The article aims to identify the current state of academic development in the field of anarchist-cybernetics, specifically around the concepts of “autogestión”, “self-management” and “self-control”.

Methodology: The article proposes a systematic literature review of the last 10 years in nine academic databases.

Results: The field presents research on radical political groups but lacks research on voluntary organisations such as cooperatives. The predominant research methods used are qualitative for empirical research, and non-empirical research is relevant in this field. Latin America and the developing economies are interesting fields for future development. Case studies and the historical method are relevant for the study of anarchy, and Beer´s VSM is the most used tool for cybernetics in this field.

Conclusion: The field appears to be of great interest for various multi-decade old journals.

Originality: This is one of the few research projects to link the organisational side of anarchism and management cybernetics. Anarchist-cybernetics is a novel subject after almost 60 years of not having any academic publications.

Limitations: As a novel subject, not many publications fit the requirements for the review.

Keywords: autogestión, self-management, self-control, anarchism, cybernetics

A. Fiala, “Anarchism,” 21 03 2021. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/anarchism/.

S. Beer, Brain of the firm, Devon: Wiley, pp. 73-151, 1972.

W. G. Walter, “The Development and Significance of Cybernetics,” Anarchy 25 march , pp. 75-89, 1963.

J. B. McEwan, “Anarchism and the Cybernetics of Self- Organising Systems,” Anarchy. 31, September, pp. 270-83, 1963.

S. Beer, Think before you think: social complexity and knowledge of knowing, Wavestone Press. , pp. 7-32, 2009.

T. Swann, Towards an anarchist cybernetics: Stafford Beer, self-organisation and radical social movements. pp. 427-456, 2018.

[Online]. Available:https://ephemerajournal.org/contribution/towards-anarchist-cybernetics-stafford-beer-self-organisation-and-radical-social

W. Ashby, Introduction to Cybernetics, New York, NY.: Wiley, pp. 244-259, 1956.

W. Ashby, “Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems,”Cybernetica, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83-99, 1958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_28

W. Ashby, “Variety, Constraint, and the Law of Requisite Variety,” in Modern system research for the behavioral scienctist, Chicago, Aldine Publishing Co., pp. 190-207, 1968. [Online]. Available:

https://www.proquest.com/openview/34512d5e51782023fac55bb07c8b77fc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=28203

W. Ashby, “Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems,”in Facets of systems science, Boston, MA., Springer, pp. 405-417, 1991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_28

S. Beer, The viable system model, Chicester: Wiley, pp. 1-19, 1989.

S. Beer, ““What is cybernetics?”,” Kybernetes, vol.31, no. 2, pp. 209-219, 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920210417283

C. Mele, J. Pels, F. Polese, “A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Aapplications,” Service Science, vol. 2, no. 1/2, pp. 126-135, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126

G. Woodcock, Anarchism, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, p. 23, 1986.

P.J. Proudhon, What is property? An inquiry into the principle of right and of government., London: William Reeves Bellamy, pp. 64-72, 1969 [1876].

P. Proudhon, The Principle of Federation and the Need to Reconstitute the Party of Revolution. Trans: Richard Vernon., Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 78-82, 1979[1863].

M. A. Bakunin, Bakunin: Statism and Anarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 18, 1990.

E. Goldman, Anarchism: and other essays, Courier Corporation, pp. 16-53, 1969 [1910].

N. Wiener, Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Boston: MIT press, p. 46, 2019.

R. Espejo, “The viable system model revisited,” in Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM, Chichester.: Wiley, pp. 77-100, 1989.

M. Vieta, “The stream of self-determination and autogestión,” Ephemeram, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 781-810, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/35898454/Marcelo_Vieta_-_The_Stream_of_Self-Determinatin_and_Autgestion_-_14-4vieta.pdf

H. Arvon, La autogestión, Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica/Edición, p. 14, 1980.

G. Wyczykier, De la dependencia a la autogestión laboral: Sobre la reconstrucción deexpériencias colectivas de trabajo en la Argentina contemporánea., Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento-Promoteo Libros, p. 27-56, 2009.

P. Rosanvallon, La autogestión, Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos, p.14-56, 1979.

C. Taibo, Repensar la anarquía: acción directa, autogestión y autonomía, Los Libros de la Catarata, pp. 178-180, 2020.

A. Whitehead, Process and reality, an essay in cosmology, New York: The Free Press, pp. 18-39, 1929.

A. Whitehead, Adventures of ideas (No. 2)., Simon and Schuster, pp.125,133, 1967.

P. Olsen, “The relevance and applicability of process metaphysics to organizational research,” Philosophy of Management, vol. 10, no.2, pp. 53-74, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20111025

R. Espejo, “Seeing a case study through a cybernetic epistemological lens,” Kybernetes vol. 40, no.9/10, pp. 1273-1296, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111169387

E. Malatesta, L´Anarchia: il nostro programma, liberliber.it, , p.10-11 [1891]1907.

L. Montaño Hirose, “Encrucijadas y desafíos de los estudios organizacionales Una reflexión desde las perspectivas institucionales.,” Innovar, vol. 30, no. 78, pp. 19-34, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26939712

K. Plys, “Worker self-management in the Third World, 1952–1979,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology., p. 1–27, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715215627190

S. Lowe and M. Rod, “Business network becoming: Figurations of time, change and process,” Industrial Marketing Management., pp. 156-164, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.012

S. Kim, “On the optimal social contract: Agency costs of self-government,” Journal of Comparative Economics, pp. 982-1001, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.01.002

T. Štrukelj, D. Zlatanovic, J. Nikolic and S. Zabukovšek, “The viable system model’s support to social responsibility,” Kybernetes, vol.50 no.3, pp. 812-835, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0860

J. Balk and R. Breitenbach, “What are the main problems in the management of rural cooperatives in southerm Brazil?,” Land Use Policy, pp. 121-129, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.047

A. Bielecki and S. Nieszporska, “Analysis of healthcare systems by using systemic approach.,”Complexity, 1-12, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6807140

M. A. Peters and T. Besley, “Critical philosophy of the postdigital,” Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 1, pp. 29-42, 2019.

J. Goldstein, “Heinz von Foerster and the second-order cybernetics,” Emergence: Complexity and Organization, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1D-1D, 2017.

C. E. Maldonado and N. Mezza-Garcia, “Anarchy and complexity,” SSRN, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 52-73, 2016.

L. Van der Walt, “Global Anarchism and Syndicalism: theory, history, resistance,” Anarchist Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 85, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A452289618/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=677daae9

R. Bower, “Who decides and who provides? The anarchistic housing practices of John Turner as realizations of Henri Lefebvre’s Autogestive space,” Alternatives, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 83-97, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375416684856

A. Ince, “From middle ground to common ground: Self-management and spaces of encounter in organic farming networkS,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 824-840, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1039110

J. L. Hammond, “The anarchism of occupy Wall Street,” Science & Society, vol. 79, no. 2, pp.288-313, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2015.79.2.288

F. Aime, S. Humphrey, D. S. DeRue and J. B. Paul, “The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 327-352, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0756

C. Piñeiro Harnecker, “Cuba’s new socialism: different visions shaping current changes,” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 107-125, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X13476006

J. Asimakopoulos, “The Ragged Edge of Anarchy: Direct Democracy,” Theory in Action, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 161-188, 2020.

M. Lundström, “Toward Anarchy: A Historical Sketch of the Anarchism-Democracy Divide,” Theory in Action, vol. 13, no. 1, p.80-114, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2004

T. Štrukelj, D. Zlatanović, J. Nikolić and S. S. Zabukovšek, “The viable system model’s support to social responsibility,” Kybernetes, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 812-835, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1102

C. Yap, “Self-organisation in urban community gardens: autogestion, motivations, and the role of communication,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 2659, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092659

R. Graham, “(Mis) conceptions of Anarchism,” Anarchist Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 32-55, 2018. [Online]. Available: link.gale.com/apps/doc/A625576750/AONE?u=anon~3822889a&sid=googleScholar&xid=3582ca4a.

B. M. Wilkowski and E. L. Ferguson, “The steps that can take us miles: Examining the short-term dynamics of long-term daily goal pursuit,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 145, no. 4, p. 516, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000150

F. Ferretti, “Organisation and formal activism: insights from the anarchist tradition,” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 36, no. 11/12, pp. 726-740, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2015-0127

J. Duda, “Cybernetics, Anarchism and Self-organisation,” Anarchist studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.53-72, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/sites/default/files/as21.1_03duda.pdf

M. Yolles and G. Fink, “Personality, pathology and mindsets: part 1 – agency, personality and mindscapes,” kybernetes, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 92-112, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2013-0011

C. Wang and A. Mukhopadhyay, “The Dynamics of Goal Revision: A Cybernetic Multiperiod Test-Operate-Test-Adjust-Loop (TOTAL) Model of Self-Regulation,” Journal of Consumer Research,, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 815-832, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/660853

V. Petrov, “Dynamic ontology as an ontological framework of anticipatory systems,” Foresight, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 38-49, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681011049866

F. Dupuis-Déri, “Anarchism and the politics of affinity,” Anarchist Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40-61, 2010. [Online]. Available: link.gale.com/apps/doc/A237066793/AONE?u=anon~44e563bd&sid=googleScholar&xid=e8050cc7

C. A. Rodrigues, “Cybernetic-scanning management: Utilizing people’s and organizations’ energies to attain greater efficiency,” Kybernetes, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 17-31, 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710741116

A. Espinosa, R. Harnden and J. Walker, “Beyond hierarchy: a complexity management perspective,” Kybernetes, vol. 36, no. 3/4, pp. 333-347, 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920710746995

D. Berry, “Rejecting ‘all the faces of subjugation’: Daniel Guérin on direct democracy, self-management and individual autonomy,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 314-336, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2019.1633102

Wigger, A., “From dissent to resistance: Locating patterns of horizontalist self-management crisis responses in Spain,” Comparative European Politics volume, vol. 16, p. 32–49, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0076-4

S. Moeller, W. Troop-Gordon and M. Robinson, “When the Going Gets Tough, the Differentiated Keep Going: Cybernetic Self-Determination, Daily Obstacles, and Persistent Goal Pursuit,” The Journal of Psychology, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 427-442, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.837022

M. Inzlicht, L. Legault and R. Teper, “Exploring the mechanisms of self-control improvement,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 302-307, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414534256

D. R. Lalande and R. Ladouceur, “Can cybernetics inspire gambling research? A limit-based conceptualization of self-control,” International Gambling Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 237-252, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.598540

R. Espelt, “Agroecology prosumption: The role of CSA networks,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 79, pp. 269-275, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.032

S. Girbés-Peco, M. J. Foraster, L. C. Mara and T. Morlà-Folch, “The role of the democratic organization in the La borda housing cooperative in Spain,” Habitat International, vol. 102, pp.1-8, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102208

A. Fishwick and B. Selwyn, “Labour-centred development in Latin America: Two cases of alternative development,” Geoforum, vol. 74, pp. 233-243, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.013

W. O’Grady, S. Morlidge and P. Rouse, “Evaluating the completeness and effectiveness of management control systems with cybernetic tools,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 33, pp. 1-15, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.003

M. Cäker and S. Siverbo, “Strategic alignment in decentralized organizations–The case of Svenska Handelsbanken,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 149-162, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.10.005

A. S. Pires, “Is Self-Management Possible? A Study on the Recovered Factories in Brazil,” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 339-360, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12182

M. Schwaninger, “Intelligent organizations: an integrative framework.,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 137-158, 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.408

A. Azadeh, K. Darivandi and E. Fathi, “Diagnosing, simulating and improving business process using cybernetic laws and the viable system model: the case of a purchasing process,” Systems research and behavioral science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66-86, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1102

M. Schwaninger, “Model-based Management: A cybernetic concept,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 564-578, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2286

A. Ovejero, “Spanish libertarian collectives: A unique historical case of worker self management,” WorkingUSA, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 521-536, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2010.00309.x

J. E. Chamorro Fuertes, O. A. Vivas Albán, “Microdevices: Tools For Medical Applications,” Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 18, no. 3, 2022, pp. 1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2022.03.11

J.C. Najar Pacheco, J.A. Bohada Jaime, H.C.I. Alemán Novoa, “Vulnerability ofinformation, on the Internet of Things,” Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-17, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2022.03.07

C.V. Niño Rondón, S.A. Castro Casadiego, Y. Restrepo Chaustre, “Machine Learning Models In People Detection And Identification: A Literature Review,” Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 18, no. 3, pp.1-23, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-6014.2022.03.05

J.Walker, The Viable Systems Model-a guide for co-operatives and federations. [Online]. Available: http://www. greybox. uklinux. net/vsmg_2, 1991, vol. 2.J.

D. L. Morales Rodríguez, J. A. Caro Silva, and L. E. Contreras Bravo, “A review on the prediction of students’ academic performance using ensemble methods”, Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–28, May 2022.

J. ROJAS And L. C. LEGUIZAMÓN BARRETO, “A review of the relation between climate variability and mass removal processes: Tunja-Páez case study”, Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–40, Jan. 2021.

D. Denyer, and D. Tranfield, “Producing a systematic review”, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, Sage Publications, London, pp. 671-689, 2009.

L. L. Hurtado-Cortés, J. A. Forero-Casallas, V. E. Ruiz-Rosas, “Artificial vision applied to manufacturing process”, Vis. Electron., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 113–122, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14483/22484728.17432

[1]

C. Osejo Bucheli, “The viability of cooperative societies from the anarchist- cybernetics perspective: a systematic review of the field and research opportunities”, ing. Solidar, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–33, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.04.

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Cession of rights and ethical commitment

As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.

In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Ingeniería Solidaría before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023)

Published

2023-09-15

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/2357-6014.2023.03.04