Stigmas and limited opportunities of on-lineand for-profit university doctorate graduates in Technology, Healthcare, and Business
Introduction: Walden, Capella, and the University of Phoenix universities generate many African-American doctoral graduates, according to Diverse Problems in Higher Education.
Problem: While these universities graduate many minority students with doctoral degrees, they contribute significantly to student loan debt. These universities are for-profit, on-line, or owned by for-profits. Because of that classification, these universities and their doctoral degrees have stigmas in higher education that may hinder African American and other minority faculty chances at elite, state flagship, and prestigious research universities.
Objective: The research aims to formulate strategies to help African-Americans be more knowledgeable about non-traditional doctoral program selection and the current stigmas of graduating with a doctorate from a totally online or for-profit university. The purpose is not to diminish the accomplishment of anyone with the intellect, courage, and talent to get a regionally accredited doctoral degree. This research intends to educate and empower African-American and other students of color in their doctoral decision-making and discuss the stigmas against doctorates from for-profit universities and totally on-line universities in the U.S.
Methodology: The approach used was a content analysis of the literature and qualitative interviews using a phenomenological research approach. The purpose is not to diminish or demonize graduates and degrees from regionally accredited on-line doctorate programs offered by for-profit universities, because they have provided opportunities and access to doctoral education. The goal is to share the realities of the current stigmas of those degrees from those universities in academic communities at the most highly ranked universities. The ultimate aim would be to educate them on the importance of school choice, even if the only viable option for doctoral completion is an on-line or hybrid doctoral program.
Results: Academic careers often depend on having a doctorate and the university that awards that doctorate. So, African-Americans and other students of color should investigate and choose brick-and-mortar universities with online and hybrid doctoral programs, which are often viewed more favorably. This study offers an accurate world understanding of the challenges and stigmas of African American doctoral graduates driven by where they pursue their doctorate degrees.
Conclusion: This project seeks to change the behavior of doctoral program selection and modification practices that would make graduates more successful and favorable for full-time faculty jobs after graduation.
Originality: The gap in the literature explored is the limited academic discussion about how attending and completing a doctorate from one of these universities can be detrimental to African-Americans, especially if they are interested in full-time tenure-track faculty careers at non profit research universities.
Limitations: More current research is needed on the stigmas and challenges of getting a doctorate from a for profit or totally online university. More scholarly dialogues from the literature could have enriched the study.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ingeniería Solidaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cession of rights and ethical commitment
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Ingeniería Solidaría before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Diverse Issues in Higher Education, Top 100 Degree Producers 2019–2020, 2022, p.1. [Online]. Available: https://top100.diverseeducation.com/ALL_SCHOOLS_2019-2020/Available: https://top100.diverseeducation.com/ALL_SCHOOLS_2019-2020/
D. Douglas-Gabriel, “These 20 schools are responsible for a fifth of all graduate school debt,” The Washington Post, 2015, p.10. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2015/07/09/these-20-schools-are-responsible-for-a-fifth-of-all-graduate-school-debt/
U.S. Department of Education, Borrower Defense Loan Discharge, 2022. p.1. [Online]. Available: https://studentaid.gov/borrower-defense/
E. Green, “Lawsuit Charges For-Profit University Preyed on Black and Female Students,” The New York Times. 2022, p.1. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/08/us/politics/walden-university-lawsuit.html
R. Kizilcec, D. Davis, and E. Wang, “On-line Degree Stigma and Stereotypes: A New Instrument and Implications for Diversity in Higher Education”. 2019, p.1. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339768
C. Haynes, “Breaking Through the Stigma of On-line Education,” Inside Higher Education. 2017, p.1. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/views/2017/05/24/breaking-stigma-online-education
T. DePriest and B. Absher, “Are Academic Administrators Becoming More Accepting of Faculty with On-line Doctoral Degrees?,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 77–88, 2013.
D. Burrell, “Transiting learning to achieve a doctorate degree from I think to I know,” in Transitioning to I Can from I Can’t, S. L. Burtons, Ed. pp, 75-84, 2016.
K. Karl and J. Peluchette, “Management faculty perceptions of candidates with on-line doctorates: Why the stigma?,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 27, no 2, pp. 89–99, 2013.
Carnegie Foundation, Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2022, p.1. [Online]. Available: https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php
E. Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster, 1963, pp. 75–83.
G. C. Elliott, H. L. Ziegler, B. M. Altman, and D. R. Scott, “Understanding stigma: Dimensions of deviance and coping,” Deviant Behavior, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 275–300, 1982. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1982.9967590
J. Crocker, B. Major, and C. Steele, “Social stigma,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, Eds. McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 504–553.
A. B. Vassilev, “Overcoming self-stigma in bipolar disorder: An intervention,”, Alliant International Univ., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/overcoming-self-stigma-bipolar-disorder/docview/2668394383/se-2
E. Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Jason Aronson, pp. 23–33, 1974.
K. Rodham, F. Fox, and N. Doran, “Exploring analytical trustworthiness and the process of reaching consensus in interpretative phenomenological analysis: Lost in transcription,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2015.
J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research: Choosing among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 53-54, 2007.
H. Priest, “An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data,” Nurse Researcher (through 2013), vol. 10, no. 2, p. 50, 2002.
G. Rolfe, “Validity, trustworthiness, and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research,” Journal of advanced nursing, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 2006.
P. I. Fusch and L. R. Ness, “Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1408-1416, 2015.
D. Sousa, “Validation in qualitative research: General aspects and specificities of the descriptive phenomenological method,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 211–227, 2014.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. pp. 43-49, 2014.
J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage, pp, 76-82, 2015.
A. McAlister, D. Lee, K. Ehlert, R. Kajfez, C. Faber, and M. Kennedy. “Qualitative Coding: An Approach to Assess Inter-Rater Reliability,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017. doi: http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28777
R. Peters, Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student’s Guide to Earning an M.A. or a Ph.D. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, pp. 80-81, 1997.
N. Rowe, The Realities of Completing a Ph.D.: How to Plan for Success. Routledge, pp. 19-22, 2018.
R. Taylor. (2013, September 12). p.1 Walden DBA Problem Statement Tutorial. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYWzCYyrgpo
W. Belcher, Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing. University of Chicago Press, pp. 15-16, 2019.
P. Silvia, How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing. APA LifeTools, pp. 8-9, 2018.
M. Hanson. (2022) p.1. “Student Loan Debt by Race,” EducationData.org. [Online]. Available: https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-by-race
J. A. Cortes Mendez and J. O. Lozano, “Teaching models in inTerneT learning, a look inTo The archiTecTure of virTual courses and Their Tendencies”, Revista Ingeniería Solidaria, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 41–51, Jul. 2012
