Unconstitutionality by Omission
a Legal Review
The development of regulatory statutes is based on the premise of the legal validity of laws and norms as well as the legal positivist concept of constitutional supremacy. This leads to the idea that no legislative or administrative law or regulation may violate a legal precept through action. It must therefore be said that lawmakers, the executive branch and administrative public servants can also violate legal precepts by omission, which is why they have to act in a certain way in order for a constitutional norm to be fully effective.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Constitución Política de Colombia. Julio 7 de 1991 (Colombia).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-543 de 1996. (M. P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz; octubre 16 de 1996). Disponible en: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/se-nado/basedoc/cc_sc_nf/1996/c-543_1996.html
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-1009 de 2005. (M. P. Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa; octubre 5 de 2005). Disponible en http://www.corteconstitucio-nal.gov.co/relatoria/2005/C-1009-05.htm
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Caso “La Última tentación de Cristo”. (Olmedo Bustos y Otros vs. Chile; febrero 5 de 2001). Disponible en: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/ar ticulos/Seriec73esp.pdf
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Caso Forneron e Hija vs. Argentina. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012 (fondo, reparaciones y costas).
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor. La inconstitucionalidad por omisión: implicaciones contemporáneas a la luz del Caso Marbury vs. Madison. Coord. P. L. Manili. Reflexiones sobre una sentencia bicentenaria. Porrúa. (2011).
Gonzalo Ramírez Cleves. El Control Constitucional sobre las omisiones legislativas en Colombia. Ponencia. ii Jornadas Colombovenezolanas de Derecho Constitucional. (2006).
Gregorio Badeni. Reforma constitucional e instituciones políticas. Ad-Hoc. (1993).
Humberto Nogueira Alcalá. Consideraciones sobre las sentencias de los tribunales constitucionales y sus efectos en América del Sur. Revista Ius et Praxis 10. 2004. Págs. 113-158.
José Julio Fernández Rodríguez. La inconstitucionalidad por omisión: teoría general, derecho comparado, el caso español. Civitas. (1998).
Luz Bulnes Aldunate. La inconstitucionalidad por omisión. Estudios constitucionales 4. Julio de 2006. Págs. 251-264. Disponible en http://www.cecoch.cl/docs/pdf/revista_ano4_1/revista_ano4_1_14.pdf
Osvaldo Gozaíni. Tratado de Derecho Procesal Constitucional latinoamericano. Tomo i. Porrúa. (2011).
Sandra Manrique. Inconstitucionalidad por omisión en Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia. (2006).
