Access to justice in Colombia must materialize a true social rule of law
The article aims to analyze access to justice as an institution that has been subject to diverse interpretations, complicating its definition in terms of scope, commitments, and limitations. This is because it represents the realization and balancing of human rights, as well as the implementation of the programs and projects on which the Colombian State was founded. Therefore, the position of the Constitutional Court is used to explain the process of access to justice as an institution, given that compliance with the law is manifested not only through human rights but also by achieving goals and values that strengthen the government. Many publications have questioned its scope, meaning, and limitations. To address this, the decisions of the Colombian Constitutional Court are considered regarding the establishment of a comprehensive system of judicial adjudication by judges, the nature of law and its justice, and actions taken according to its position as a fundamental legal authority. Among its partisan guarantees, the Court has many responsibilities to ensure compliance with the constraints that must be taken into account. Likewise, its contribution regarding the concept of constitution and the determination of the organizational structure, particularly related to the jurisdiction established by Colombian law and the use of other methods of public justice administration, will be explained. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has become the primary normative source for justice—and even customary law—to elevate access to justice to the level of a fundamental right. The jurisprudence of this corporation has recognized it as a fundamental right, placing it within Articles 8 and 25, in relation to Article 1.1 of the Convention. Furthermore, it has gradually enriched its content, expanding it beyond the criminal field and applying it to all areas, considering it as the “Right of Rights.”
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Andrés G. Serrano, Obligaciones de los Estados parte de la Convención Americana, Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, vol. 8, N° 2, 2013, pp. 45-56.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia C-1195/2001, MP: Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes, Nov. 5, 2001.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia C-207/2003, MP: Eduardo Montealegre Lynett, Mar. 11, 2003.
Eugenio S. Kloss, Derecho fundamental de acceso a la justicia (a propósito de requisitos de admisibilidad), Revista Chilena de Derecho, 1998, p. 273.
Francisco H. Toscano López, Algunas facetas del derecho fundamental al acceso efectivo a la administración de justicia en Colombia, Rev. Derecho Privado, N° 29, 2015, p. 213-232.
Francisco Martín Diz, El derecho fundamental a justicia: revisión integral e integradora del derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva, Rev. Derecho Político, N° 106, 2019.
Gustavo A. Rodríguez & Nancy C. González, La jurisdicción especial indígena y los retos del acceso a la justicia ambiental, Eds. Liliana Estupiñán Achury, Claudia Stormi, Rubén Martínez Dalmau & Fernando Antonio de Carvalho Dantas, La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos en el constitucionalismo democrático 473 (Universidad Libre, 2019).
Hernán A. García, El bloque de constitucionalidad en Colombia, Estudios Constitucionales, vol. 3, N° 1, 2005, pp. 231-242.
Hugo S. Porto, La administración de justicia en el Estado Social de Derecho privatizado, Jurídicas, vol. 5, N° 1, 2008, p. 9.
Iván R. Cortés Albornoz, El acceso a la justicia a la luz del Estado social de derecho en Colombia, Revista Científica General José María Córdova, vol. 13, N° 16, 2015, pp. 81-103.
Jaime A. Sánchez Gavilánez, Los jueces de paz y el derecho constitucional de acceso a la justicia en Tungurahua (tesis de maestría, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, 2020).
Javier S. Hernández-Yunis, El principio de inmediatez en la acción de tutela contra providencias judiciales, Iter Ad Veritatem, vol. 13, 2015, pp. 165-197.
Julio C. Bayón Mohíno, El imperio de la ley y la interpretación y aplicación del derecho: Dos visiones, 2017.
Julio C. Hitters, Control de constitucionalidad y control de convencionalidad. Comparación (criterios fijados por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos), Estudios Constitucionales, vol. 7, N° 2, 2009, pp. 109-128.
Luis F. Cano-Blandón, El principio de inmediatez de la acción de tutela: ¿Una barrera para la protección judicial de los derechos fundamentales? Entramado, vol. 13, N° 1, 2017, pp. 114-127.
Luis A. C. Suárez, El control de convencionalidad y la protección de los derechos humanos en Colombia, dixi, N° 19, 2014, pp. 53-70.
Luis G. S. García, Rosa T. S. Salazar, Adriana D. P. B. Garza & María S. A. Herrera, El acceso a la justicia alternativa como derecho humano: la utilización de los MASC en sede judicial, Eirene Estud. Paz y Conflictos, vol. 6, N° 11, 2023, pp. 171-190.
Luz X. Díaz Gómez, Línea jurisprudencial de la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Aplicación de las reglas de inmediatez y contemporaneidad en la terminación del contrato por justa causa en razón al reconocimiento de la pensión, 2023.
María Vásquez Alfaro & Rodrigo Torrado, La recepción del enfoque del acceso a la justicia en el derecho procesal colombiano, in Justicia: Un enfoque transdisciplinar 51-245 (Universidad del Norte-Grupo Ibáñez, 2016).
Mauro Cappelletti & Bryant G. Garth, El acceso a la justicia: la tendencia en el movimiento mundial para hacer efectivos los derechos, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1996.
Néstor P. Sagüés, Las opiniones consultivas de la Corte Interamericana, en el control de convencionalidad, Pensamiento Constitucional, vol. 20, N° 20, 2015, pp. 275-283.
Oscar A. Herrán Pinzón, El alcance de los principios de la administración de justicia frente a la descongestión judicial en Colombia, Prolegómenos, vol. 16, N° 32, 2013, pp. 105-122.
Sonia Insignares Cera, El acceso a la justicia a partir del mecanismo de solución de controversias previsto en el tlc col-usa, Rev. Derecho, N° 43, 2015, pp. 197-236.
