Innominate Rights in the Inter-American System
Introduction: Th central theme of this research article is the implementation of conventionality control exercised by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and its reception by judges, judicial offials, and public authorities. Other core topics include the implementation of guarantees of innominate rights, and the creation of judicial activism through the right to education as a local jurisdictional matter within the American member countries, as well as how these member countries have lashed out in serious collective violation.
Methodology: In order to analyze these issues, it is necessary to place them in the context of Mexican and Colombian law to demonstrate the necessary role of these legalsystems in the determination of the issues’ origin and causes, which include: 1) the transition from a block of constitutionality to a block of conventionality; 2) the internationalization of human rights; 3) the conventionalization of law; 4) transjudicial communication on precedent; and 5) innominate rights.
Results: All of the above is a result of the open-textured norms of the American Declaration and American Convention on Human Rights, as well as a strong commitment to international human rights law.
Conclusions: A hermeneutical interpretation of inter partes cases and their effcts on sentencing for the American countries is needed.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos (Pacto de San José). Noviembre 7 al 22 de 1969.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Sentencia de 24 de febrero del 2012. (Atala Riffo y Niñas vs. Chile, febrero 24 del 2008).
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Sentencia de 26 de noviembre del 2010 (Cabrera García Montiel Vs. México, noviembre 26 del 2010).
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Sentencia de 1 de septiembre del 2015. (Lluy vs. Ecuador, septiembre 1 del 2015).
Daniel Torres Bayona. Criterios utilizados por la Corte Constitucional para Establecer un catalogo abierto a los derechos fundamentales. Universidad Industrial de Santander. (2008).
Diego López. Teoría Impura del Derecho. Legis. (2012)
Germán J. Bidart Campos. Teoría general de los derechos humanos. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (1989).
Holmes. Oliver The path of the law. Collected Papers. (1920).
Luigi Ferrajoli. Título. Editorial. (1999).
Néstor Sagüés. Obligaciones internacionales y con-trol de convencionalidad. Opus Magna. (2011).
Rodrigo Brito y Miguel Carbonell. La globalización y los derechos humanos, a la luz de la reforma constitucional de junio de 2011. unam. (2011).
Rudolf von Ihering. La lucha por el derecho. Trotta (2003).
Ramiro Ávila Santamaría. En defensa del Neo constitucionalismo Andino. Corporación de Estudios y publicaciones-cep. (2014).
Sakia Sassen. Territorio, autoridad y derechos. Editorial Katz. (2010).
Sara Gordon. Ciudadanía y derechos sociales ¿criterios distributivos? Clacso. (2001).
Suprema Corte de la Nación. xxvii,1.o 10a
Tribunal Constitucional Español. stc 29/1982 (jc, vol. III, 13 de enero de 1982).
Víctor Ferreres. Una defensa del modelo Europeo de control de Constitucionalidad. Editorial Macial Pons. (2011).
