Estimación de la técnica in vitro de gases  frente a otras técnicas de digestibilidad

Javier Vargas Bayona; Germán Mejía Porras; Julia Bedoya Mashuth; Juan Felipe Gómez Patiño

doi:10.16925/sp.v9i18.547

Estimación de la técnica in vitro de gases frente a otras técnicas de digestibilidad

Revisión

https://doi.org/10.16925/sp.v9i18.547

Javier Vargas Bayona Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Sede Bucaramanga.

Germán Mejía Porras Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Sede Bucaramanga.

Julia Bedoya Mashuth Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Sede Bucaramanga.

Juan Felipe Gómez Patiño Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Sede Bucaramanga.

To estimate the metabolism of the food consumed by ruminants, various nutritional analysis techniques have been developed to provide valuable information for research into animal nutrition. Objectives include criteria to increase productive efficiency in tropical production systems, particularly when tropical forages are the nutritional basis for ruminants. Thus, the motivation to review and document different digestibility techniques to determine the best choice among national and international references. The aim was to review the literature about for age digestibility techniques developed for estimating the overall behavior of foods in ruminants. More than 50 references were reviewed, obtaining information on in vivo, in situ and in vitro digestibility techniques along with their limitations and advantages. It can thus be inferred that these techniques have become very important biotrial tools, given that they are easy to carry out, reduce costs and can be applied locally. They provide valuable information, particularly in view of the small number of studies on tropical forages. Based on the forage digestibility techniques findings, we may conclude that the in vitro gas production digestibility technique is the most versatile tool, with accessible and instructive procedures and at lower cost; it is also more compatible with animal welfare regulations because it uses feces as inoculums. However, further studies need to be carried out regarding the inoculums used, given the need for protocol standardization and because kinetic behavior in the trials has not produced the expected results.

Keywords: bioensayo, inóculo, licor ruminal, rumiantes, transductor de presión

Posada SL, Noguera RR. Técnica in vitro de produc ‑ ción de gases: Una herramienta para la evaluación de alimentos para rumiantes. Livest Res Rural Develop. 2005; 17(4). [Consultado: 7 de junio del 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/4/posa17036.html

Quin JI, Van der Wath JG, Myburgh S. Studies on the alimentary tract of Merino sheep in South Africa. 4. Description of experimental technique. Onderstrepoort J Vet Sci Anim Ind. 1938; 11: 341‑60.

Balch CC, Johnson VW. Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 2. Factors influencing the rate of breakdown of cellulose (cotton thread) in the rumen of the cow. Br J Nutr. 1950; 4: 389‑95.

Ørskov ER, Hovell D, Mould F. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1980; 5: 195‑213.

Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two stage technique for the in vitro of forage crops. J Brit Grassland Soc. 1963; 18: 104‑11.

Goering H, Van Soest. Forage fiber analysis ARS/USDA Agric. Handbook. 1970; 379.

Cone JW, Beuvink JM, Rodriges M. Use and applica ‑ tions of an automated time related gas production test for In Vitro study of fermentation kinetics in the rumen. Rev Port Zootec. 1994; 1: 25‑37.

Menke KH, Raab L, Salewksi A, Steingas H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci. 1979; 93: 217‑22.

Mauricio RM. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an In vitro gas production technique for evaluating forage. [Ph.D. Thesis]. UK: The University of Reading; 1999: 281.

Posada SL y Rosero. Valoración de las heces y el líquido ruminal como inoculo en la técnica in vitro de producción de gases. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2006. p. 63.

Pell AN, Schofield P. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J Dairy Sci. Abr 1993; 76(4): 1063‑73.

Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, Mcallan AB, France JA. Simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994; 48(3‑4): 185‑97.

Nocek JE. In situ and other methods to estimate Rumi ‑ nal Protein and Energy Digestibility: a review. J Dairy Sci. 1988; 71(8): 2051‑69.

Mertens, DR. Kinetics of cell wall digestion and passage in ruminants. En: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J, editors. Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. American Society Agronomy; 1993. p. 535‑70.

Zanton GI, Heinrichs AJ. Evaluation of modeling procedure for fitting in situ feed degradation profiles. J Animal Sci. Jun 2009; 87(6): 2080‑8.

Ellis WC, Matis JH, Hill TM, Murphy MR. Methodology for estimation digestion and passage kinetics of forages. En: Fahey GC Jr., Collins M, Mertens DR, Moser LE, editors. Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization. American Society of Agronomy; 1994. p. 682‑756.

Stern MD, Bach A, Calsamigila S. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J Anim Sci. Ago 1997; 75(8): 2256‑76.

Noziere P, Michalet‑Doreau B. In Sacco methods. En: D’Mello JP, editor. Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. CAB International, Oxon; 2000. p. 233‑53.

Winterholller SJ, Lalman DL, Dye TK, Mcmurphy CP, Richards CJ. In situ ruminal degradation characteristics of by product feedstuffs for beef cattle consuming low quality forage. J Animal Sci. Sep 2009; 87(9): 2996‑3002.

Madsen J, Stensig T, Weisburger MR, Hvelplund T. Estimation of the physical fill of feedstuffs in the rumen by the in sacco degradation characteristics. Livest Prod Sci. 1994; 39: 43‑47.

Meyer JH, Mackie RI. Microbiological evaluation of the intraruminal in sacculus digestion technique. Appl Environ Microbiol. Mar 1986; 51(3): 622‑9.

Noziere P, Michalet‑Doreau B. Validation of in sacco method: influence of sampling site, nylon bag or rumen contents, on fibrolytic activity of solid‑associated microorganisms. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996; 57(3): 203‑10.

Michalet‑Doreau B. New methods for estimating forage feed values: in sacco. En: XVIth International Grassland Congress, Nice. afpf , inra, Route de St‑Cyr, Versailles; 1990. p. 1850‑1852.

Crampton EW. Applied animal nutrition. San Francisco: Freeman; 1956. p. 458.

Raymond WF, Harris CE, Harker VG. Studies on the digestibility of herbage. I. Technique of measurement of digestibility and some observations of factor affecting the accuracy of a digestibility data. J Brit Grassland Soc. 1953; 8(4): 301‑14.

Blaxter KL. The energy metabolism of ruminats. London: Hutchnson; 1962. p. 329.

Maynard LA. Animal nutrition. 3rd. ed. New York: McGraw‑Hill; 1951. p. 474.

Galina MA et al. Cinética ruminal y crecimiento de ca‑ britos suplementados con un probiótico de bacterias ácido‑lácticas. Pastos y Forrajes [online]. 2009; 32(4): 1. [Consultado: 6 de octubre del 2011]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864‑03942009000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso

Barnicoate CR, Estimation of apparent digestibility coefficients by means of an inert “reference‑substance”. New Zealand Science and Technology. 1945; 2: 202‑12.

Weiss WP. Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods. En: Fahey GC Jr., Collins M, Mertens DR, Moser LE, editors. Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization. American Society of Agronomy; 1994. p. 644‑81.

Firkins JL, Allen MS, Oldick BS, St‑Pierre NR. Modeling ruminal digestibility of carbohydrates and microbial protein flow to the duodenum. J Dairy Sci. 1998; 81: 3350‑69.

Menke KH, Steingas H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development. 1988; 28: 7‑55.

Mauricio RM, Mould FL, Dhanoa MS, Owen E, Channa KS, Theodorou MK. A semi‑automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1999; 79: 321‑30.

Beuvink JM, Spoelstra SF, Hogendorp J. An automated method for measuring time‑course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Nether J Agric Sci. 1992; 40: 401‑7.

Doane PH, Schofield P, Pell AN. ndf disappearance. Gas and VFA production during In vitro fermentation of six forages. J Anim Sci. Dic 1997; 75(12): 3342‑52.

Williams BA. Cumulative gas‑production techniques for forage evaluation. En: Givens DI, Owen E, Omed HM, Axford RFE, editors. Forage Evaluation in Rumi ‑ nant Nutrition. Wallingford (UK) cab International; 2000. p. 475.

Grant RJ, Mertens DR. Development of buffer systems for pH control and evaluation of pH effects on fiber digestion In vitro. J Dairy Sci. Jun 1992; 75(6): 1581‑87.

Schofiled P. Gas production methods. En: Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. Wallingford (UK). CAB International; 2000. p. 450.

Opatpatanakit Y, Kellaway RC, Lean IJ, Annison G, Kir by A. Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro. Aust J Agric Res. 1994; 45(6): 1247‑63.

Schofiled P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci. Nov 1994; 72(11): 2980‑91.

Makkar H, Recent advances in In vitro gas method for evaluation of nutritional quality of feed resources. 2001 [Consultado: 18 de octubre del 2011]. Dis ‑ ponible en: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/ARTICLE/AGRIPPA/570_EN_toc.htm

Davies ZS, Mason D, Brooks AE, Griffith GW, Merry RJ, Theodoru MK. An Automated System for Measuring Gas Production from Forage Inoculated with Rumen Fluid and its use in Determining the Effect of Enzymes on Grass Silage. J Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2000; 83: 205‑21.

Valencia D, Giraldo L. Cinética de la degradación ruminal in vitro de forrajes suplementados con glicerina cruda proveniente de la obtención de biodiesel del aceite de palma africana. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua. 2009; 22: 3.

Czerkawzky JW, Breckenridge G. Design of a long-term simulation technique (Rusitec). Brit J Nutr. Nov 1977; 38(3): 371‑84.

Pashaei S, Razmazar V, Mirshekar R. Gas Production: A Proposed in vitro method to Estimate the Extent of Digestion of a Feedstuff in the Rumen. J Biol Sci. Sep 2010; 10(6): 573‑80.

Grings EE, Blümmel M, Sudekum KH. Methodological considerations in using gas production techniques for estimating ruminal microbial efficiencies for silage based diets. J Anim Feed Sci Technol. Sep 2005; 123(1): 527‑45.

Pell AN, Doane PH, Schofiled P. In vitro digestibility and gas production. En: Simpósio sobre Tópicos Especiais em Zootecnia. Lavras, mg; 1997. p. 109‑32.

Nsahlai IV, Umunna NN, Negassa D. The effect of multi-purpose tree digesta on in vitro gas production from napier grass or neutral‑detergent fibre. J Sci Food Agric. 1995; 69: 519‑28.

Getachew G, Blümell M, Makkar HP, Becker K. In vitro measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. Jun 1998; 72(3‑4): 261‑81.

Ørskov ER, Reid GW, Kay M. Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Animal. Feb 1988; 46(1): 29‑34.

Liu Jian Xin, Susenbeth A, Sudekum KH. In vitro production measurements to evaluate interactions between untreated and chemically treated rice straws, grass hay, and mulberry leaves. J Anim Sci. Feb 2002; 80(2): 517‑24.

Jones RJ Barnes P. In vitro digestibility assessment of tropical shrub legumes using rumen fluid or fecal fluid as the inoculum source. Trop Grasslands. 1996; 30: 374‑77.

El‑Meadaway A, Mir Z, Zaman PS. y Yanke LJ., Relative efficacy of inocula from rumen liquor and fecal solution for determining In vitro digestibility and gas production. J Anim Sci. 1998; 78: 673‑9.

Omed HM, Lovett DK, Axford RFE. Faeces as Source of Microbial Enzymes for Estimating Digestibility. En: Givens DI, Owen E, Axford RFE, Omed HM, editors. Forage Evaluation in Ruminal Nutrition. Wallingford (UK): CABI Publishing; 2000. p. 135‑54.

Mauricio RM, Owen E, Mould FL, Givens I, Theodorou MK, France J, Davies DR, Dhanoa MS. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2001; 89(1‑2): 33‑48.

Vargas Bayona, J., Mejía Porras, G., Bedoya Mashuth, J., & Gómez Patiño, J. F. (2013). Estimación de la técnica in vitro de gases frente a otras técnicas de digestibilidad. Spei Domus, 9(18). https://doi.org/10.16925/sp.v9i18.547

Download Citation

En calidad de autor del artículo, declaro que este, es un trabajo original, inédito, de mi creación exclusiva, que no se ha postulado a evaluación simultánea en otra publicación y que no cuenta con algún impedimento de cualquier naturaleza para la concesión de los derechos previstos en este contrato.

En ese sentido, me comprometo a esperar un resultado de evaluación de la revista, antes de considerar su presentación a otro medio, en caso de que la respuesta de publicación no sea positiva; adicionalmente, me comprometo a responder por cualquier acción de reivindicación, plagio u otra clase de reclamación que al respecto pudiera sobrevivir por parte de terceros.

Asimismo, declaro que como autor o coautor, estoy de acuerdo por completo con los contenidos presentados en este trabajo y cedo todos los derechos patrimoniales, es decir, la reproducción, comunicación pública, distribución, divulgación, transformación, puesta a disposición y demás formas de explotación de la obra por cualquier medio o procedimiento, a la revista y a la Editorial de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 18 (2013)

Published

2013-06-01

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/sp.v9i18.547