Psychosocial functions and consequences of gossip in organizations : or the case of a group of workers in a business area in a service provider company
Departamento de Psicología de la Escuela de Humanidades de la Universidad EAFIT, Colombia
email: smoreno@eafit.edu.co
Universidad EAFIT
email: avasquez@eafit.edu.co
Universidad EAFIT
email: agananm@eafit.edu.co
Universidad EAFIT
email: jorejue2@eafit.edu.co
Objective. The psychosocial functions and positive and negative consequences of gossip were identified within a group of marketing employees from a service company in Medellin, Colombia.
Methodology. It was a qualitative study with a descriptive approach developed as a case study based on semi-structured interviews with 7 employees. Gossip was found to have the psychosocial function of enabling the transmission of information, strengthening the bonds of friendship, and entertainment.
Results. The main facilitator of gossip is uncertainty; the main obstacle is censorship; the positive aspect about gossip is that it empowers the transmission of the organizational culture and, paradoxically, it can be an enabler of conflict resolution, as well as a generator of conflicts, misunderstandings, and discomfort.
In conclusion, gossip works as an effective mechanism for the exchange of information with evaluative content about absent third parties in a context of trust, allowing the release of emotional states, which prevents the direct expression of violence in organizations.
Baumeister, R., Zhang, L.; Vohs, K. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.11 1
Beersma, B.; Van Kleef, G. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640-2670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x
Da Cunha, A., Silva Leite Basto, M.; Gugelmin, E. (2013). A Comunicação Interna Como Diferencial Competitivo. Capital Científico, 11(3), 1-31. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230463846.pdf
De Pietrosemoli, L. (2009). El chisme y su función en la conversación. Lengua y Habla, 13, 55- 67. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=511951369005 .
Dunbar, R. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22, 469-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J
Dunbar, R. (2004). Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100
Ferrari, F. (2015). In Praise of Gossip: The Organizational Functions and Practical Applications of Rumours in the Workplace. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 5(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.854452
Foster, E. (2004). Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78
Gadamer, H. G. (2001). Verdad y método. Tomo I. Salamanca, España: Ediciones Sígueme, S. A.
García, V., & Arellano, M. (2008). Género, sexualidad y poder: el chisme en la vida estudiantil de la Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, México. Estudios sobre las culturas contemporáneas, 14(27), 77-112. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31602704
Guerin, B., Miyazaki, Y. (2003). Rumores, chisme y leyendas urbanas: Una teoría de contingencia social. Revista latinoamericana de psicología, 35(3), 257-272. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80535302
Harari, Y. (2014). Sapiens. De animales a dioses: Una breve historia de la humanidad. Editorial Debate.
Hernández, B. (2009). Prácticas de selección de personal, un instrumento de dominación socialmente aceptado. AD-minister, (14), 137-161. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=322327244007
Hernández, R. (2005). Metodologías de la investigación. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial McGraw-Hill.
Kuo, C.-C., Chang, K., Quinton, S., Lu, C.-Y., & Lee, I. (2015). Gossip in the workplace and the implications for HR management: a study of gossip and its relationship to employee cynicism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, (August), 2288-2307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.985329
Levin, J.; Arluke, A. (1985). An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip. Sex Roles, 12, 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287594
Levin, J.; Arluke, A. (1987). Gossip: The inside scoop. New York: Editorial Plenum.
Lyons, M.; Hughes, S. (2015). Malicious mouths? The Dark Triad and motivations for gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.009
Manrique, H., Lopera, I., Perez, J., Ramírez, V., Henao, C.; de San Pablo, C. L. S. (2016). Clínica analítica de las organizaciones. Medellín, Colombia: Fondo Editorial EAFIT.
Michelson, G.; Mouly, S. (2000). Rumour and gossip in organisations: a conceptual study. Management Decision, 38(5), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340508
Posea, C. (2012). Communication implied by the Project management. International Conference of Scientific Paper Afases 2012, 1, 197–204. https://www.afahc.ro/ro/afases/2012/manag/Posea.pdf
Ramírez, C. ; Lopera, J.; Zuluaga, M.; Ramírez, V.; Henao, C. y Carmona, D. (2014) Relaciones psicología-Psicoanálisis. Bogotá: Editorial San Pablo.
Salmerón, M. (2016). Variables psicológicas que impulsan la difusión del rumor/Psychological variables which boost dissemination of rumor. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, (40), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2016.40.104-121 .
Stirling, R. (1956). Some psychological mechanisms operative in gossip. Social Forces Journal, 34, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2574050
Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., Ecklund, E. (2016). Gossip as Social Control: Informal Sanctions on Ethical Violations in Scientific Workplaces. Social Problems Journal, 22 (2). 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw022
Copyright (c) 2020 Pensando Psicología

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Pensando Psicología before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.