Gender Stereotypes, Maternity and Employment : A Psychosociological Analysis
Introduction: In the last decades there has been a substantial change in the position of women in the labor market, although it cannot yet be said that there is an equal share of jobs between men and women. On the one hand, there are still clear indications of employment discrimination against women and, on the other hand, the participation of men in domestic work has not grown at the same rate as that of women in paid work.
Objective: To reflect on the ideological bases supporting this inequality by analyzing the weight that traditional gender stereotypes, especially those built around motherhood, have on the career of young women.
Method: Data come from a qualitative study in which a sample of young people with different positions within the labor market was interviewed.
Results: Generally, the discourses on maternity and upbringing are characterized by a marked biological and psychological essentialism that attributes a greater natural capacity for the care of children to women.
Conclusions: Gender stereotypes that are built around motherhood are one of the main ideological factors that maintain discrimination against women in the labor market.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Nueva York: Doubleday Anchor.
Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bobel, C. (2002). The Paradox of Natural Motherhood. Filadelfia: Temple University Press.
Bravo, P. M., Figueras-Maz, M., y Gómez-Puertas, L. (2014). El ideal de madre en el siglo XXI. La representación de la maternidad en las revistas de familia/The ideal mother in the XXI century. The representation of motherhood in family magazines. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20(1), 487-504.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. y Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-78.
Carrasquer, P. (2009). El empleo femenino en España y Europa: cambios y continuidades. En J. Astelarra (Coord.), Género y empleo (pp. 15-23). Madrid: Fundación Carolina.
Castillo-Mayén, R. y Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of Current Gender Stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1044-1060.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas-CIS. (2004). Estudio 2578. Actitudes y opiniones sobre la familia. Recuperado de http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=4556
Crosby, F., Williams, J. y Biernat, P. (Eds.). 2004. The Maternal Wall. Research and Policy Perspectives on Discrimination Against Mother (Special Issue). Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 675-682.
Cuddy, A., Fiske, S. T. y Glick, P. (2004). When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn’t Cut the Ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701-718.
Cundiff, J. L. y Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 75(3-4), 126-138.
Deaux, K. y Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 46, 991-1004.
Domínguez-Folgueras, M. (2010). ¿Cada vez más igualitarios? Los valores de género de la juventud y su aplicación en la práctica. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 90, 103-122.
Durán, M. A. (2000). La contribución del trabajo no remunerado a la economía española. Alternativas metodológicas. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer. Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales y Trabajo.
Durán, M. A. (2006). Sociopsicología del trabajo no remunerado. En A. Garrido (coord.), Sociopsicología del Trabajo (pp. 133-176). Barcelona: UOC.
Durán, M. A. (2005). El trabajo no remunerado y las familias. Aecqualitas. Revista Jurídica de Igualdad de Oportunidades entre Mujeres y Hombres, 17, 47-59.
Durán, M. A. y Rogero, J. (2005). Nuevas parejas para viejas desigualdades. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 1, 25-37.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagly, A. H. y Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
Eagly, A. H. y Mladinic, A. (1994). Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers from Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1-35.
Eagly, A. H. y Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and men into Social Roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
Fiske, S. (1993). Controlling Other People. The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621-628.
Fiske, S., Cuddy, A., Glick, P. y Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (often mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth. Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
Flaquer, L. y Escobedo, A. (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32(1), 69-99.
García-Román, J. (2012). ¿Son las parejas españolas menos igualitarias que las europeas? Diferencias en el tiempo empleado en trabajo no remunerado en España, Italia, Alemania, Francia y Reino Unido. Documents d’ analisi geográfica, 58, 397-416.
Glick, P. y Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512.
Glick, P. y Fiske, S. T. (2001a). An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
Glick, P. y Fiske, S. T. (2001b). Ambivalent Sexism. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Glick, P. y Fiske, S. T. (2001c). Ambivalent Stereotypes as Legitimizing Ideologies: Differentiating Paternalistic and Envious Prejudice. En J. T. Jost (Ed.), TThe Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Stereotypes of Working Moms (pp. 278-306). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Hays, S. (1996). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender Stereotypes and Workplace Bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Heilman, M. E. y Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 393-398.
Heilman, M. E. y Okimoto, V. (2008). Motherhood: A Potential Source of Bias in Employment Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology. 93(1), 189-198.
Hoffman, C. y Hurst, N. (1990). Gender Stereotypes: Perception or Rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [ine]. (1976). Encuesta de población activa. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Recuperado de http://www.ine.es
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [ine]. (2017). Encuesta de población activa. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Recuperado de http://www.ine.es
Jackman, M. R. (1994). The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jost, J. T. y Banaji, M. R. (1994). The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology. 33, 1-27.
Jost, J. T. y Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498-509.
Koening, A. M. y Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for The Social Role Theory of Stereotype Content: Observations of Groups’ Roles Shape Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 371-392.
Meil, G. y Rogero, J. (2014). Abuelas, abuelos y padres varones en el cuidado de la infancia. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32(1), 49-67.
Oakley, A. (1979). Becoming a Mother. Oxford, RU: Martin Robertson.
Osborne, R. (1987). Simmel y la cultura femenina. Las múltiples lecturas de unos viejos textos. Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. 40, 97-112.
Park, B., Banchefsky, S. y Reynolds, E. B. (2015). Psychological Essentialism, Gender, and Parenthood: Physical Transformation Leads to Heightened Essentialist Conceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 949-967.
Pastor, I. (2009). Las mujeres jóvenes en el mercado de trabajo: entre los datos y los discursos. En J. Astelarra (Coord.), Género y empleo (pp. 79-86). Madrid: Fundación Carolina.
Paterna, C., Martínez, C., Rosa, A. y Yago, C. (2001). De la comparación al compromiso. Un análisis de la identidad social femenina. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 11(2), 5-22.
Ridgeway, C., y Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a Status Characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 683-700.
Rodríguez-Menéndez, M. C., y Fernández-García, C. M. (2010). Empleo y maternidad: el discurso femenino sobre las dificultades para conciliar familia y trabajo. Cuaderno de Relaciones Laborales, 28(2), 257-275.
Rodríguez, M.C., Peña, J. V. y Torío, S. (2009). La experiencia de la maternidad y la paternidad: análisis del discurso de las creencias sobre la crianza y el cuidado infantil. Infancia y aprendizaje, 32(1), 81-96.
Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., y Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex Role Stereotypes and Self-Concepts in College Students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287-295.
Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational Cultures, Women Managers and Exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16(8), 371-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006289
Simmel, G. (1938). Cultura femenina y otros ensayos. México: Espasa Calpe Mexicana.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., y Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29-39.
Sullivan, C. (2015). ‘Bad Mum Guilt’: the representation of ‘work-life balance’ in uk women’s magazines. Community, Work & Family, 18(3), 284-298.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.
Tobío, C. (2012). Cuidado e identidad de género. De las madres que trabajan a los hombres que cuidan. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70(2), 399-422. doi: 10.3989/ris.2010.08.26
Torns, T. y Recio, C. (2012). Las desigualdades de género en el mercado de trabajo: entre la continuidad y la transformación. Revista de Economía Crítica, 14, 178-202.
Wall, G. (2013). ‘Putting family first’: shifting discourses of motherhood and childhood in representations of mothers’ employment and child care. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 162-171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.006
Williams, J. E. y Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Thirty-Nation Study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wynn, A. (2017). Gender, parenthood, and perceived chances of promotion. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 645-664.
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Pensando Psicología before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.