Una versión en español de la Achievement Task Value Scale for University Students : fiabilidad y validez interna, convergente y de criterio en estudiantes argentinos
National University of Córdoba
email: jsanchezrosas@psyche.unc.edu.ar
Asia University
Ph.D. in Education. Department of Social Work.
email: yclou@asia.edu.tw
MingDao University
Ph.D. in Education. Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction.
email: snoopystock100@gmail.com
National University of Córdoba
Ps. Laboratory of Psychological and Educational Assessment, Faculty of Psychology, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
email: sillarroza@live.com.ar
Objetivo: se evaluó una versión ajustada al idioma español de la Achievement Task Value Scale, la cual evalúa los ítems valorativos de tareas que corresponden a importancia, utilidad, interés y costo, con respecto a sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra de estudiantes argentinos.
Método: para evaluar la estructura interna se utilizaron estrategias exploratorias y de confirmación. Además, la convergencia de la escala se evaluó relacionándola con una escala valorativa unidimensional de tareas. Las evidencias de la validez de criterio se sustentaron relacionando las escalas con disfrute, metas de progreso y atención. Finalmente, la consistencia interna se estimó utilizando los coeficientes Alpha y Omega de Cronbach.
Conclusiones: los resultados permiten afirmar que esta versión del instrumento hace posible evaluar de manera confiable y válida tres componentes valorativos de la tarea: utilidad, interés y costo.
Acee, T. W., & Weinstein, C. E. (2010). Effects of a Value-Reappraisal Intervention on Statistics Students’ Motivation and Performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 487–512. doi:10.1080/00220970903352753
Arias, B. (2008). Desarrollo de un ejemplo de Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio con LISREL, AMOS y SAS. Seminario de Actualización en Investigación sobre Discapacidad SAID 2008. Universidad de Valladolid.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 78–102. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0901_5
Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. S. Eccles & K. Salmelo-Aro (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences: Motivational psychology (2nd Ed.) (pp. 503-509). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.26099-6
Burgos Castillo, E., & Sánchez Abarca, P. (2012). Adaptación y validación preliminar del cuestionario de motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje. Tesis para optar al título de Psicólogo/a, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad del Bío-Bío.
Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd Ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9780203805534
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011) A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337-346. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
Domínguez-Lara, S. (2016). Intervalos de confianza en el reporte de la fiabilidad: un análisis necesario. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 39(1), 169-170. doi: 10.23938/S1137-6627/2016000100024
Domínguez-Lara, S., & Merino-Soto, C. (2015). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328.
Donolo, D., A. Chiecher, A., Paoloni, P., & Rinaudo, M. C. (2008). MSLQE-MSLQVV. Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire. Propuestas para la medición de la motivación y el uso de estrategias de aprendizaje. EFURNAC, Río Cuarto.
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
Durick, A. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M., (2014). One Size Fits Some: Instructional Enhancements to Promote Interest, Mathematics and Science Learning. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Eccles J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. doi: 10.1177/0146167295213003
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. B. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s selfand task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi: 10.2307/1131221
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 149–169. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science. New York: Guilford Press.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
Gargallo, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M., & Pérez-Pérez, C. (2009). El cuestionario CEVEAPEU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de las estrategias de aprendizaje de los estudiantes universitarios. relieve, 15(2), 1-31.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2007). spss for Windows: Step by step 14.0 update (7th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, (7th Ed.), Pearson, Upper Saddle River: NJ.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping Parents to Motivate Adolescents in Mathematics and Science: An Experimental Test of a Utility-Value Intervention. Psychological Science, 3, 1-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435530
Harter, S. (1986). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver: University of Denver.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179-194. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1002_3
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447
Hoyle, R., & Panter, A. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 100–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., Kosovich, J. J., & Lazowski, R. A. (2016). Student Motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy value framework. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the twenty-first century: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 241-278). Basel: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_10
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880–895. doi: 10.1037/a0019506
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes. Science, 326, 1409-1412. doi: 10.1126/science.1177067
Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2016). Making Connections: Replicating and Extending the Utility Value Intervention in the Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
Jones, S. H., Johnson, M. L., & Campbell, B. D. (2015). Influence of task-values, engagement, and attention allocation on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 62-70. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.004
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
Karadeniz, S., Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, Ö E., Çakmak, E. K., & Demirel, F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12-18 year old children: results of confirmatory factor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 108-117.
Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., & Getty, S. (2014). A Practical Measure of Student Motivation: Establishing Validity Evidence for the Expectancy-Value-Cost Scale in Middle School. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5-6), 790–816. doi:10.1177/0272431614556890
Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Motivation Interventions in Education: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 602-640. doi:10.3102/0034654315617832
Lee Johnson, M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.003
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. doi:10.1037/a0033266
Lou, Y. C., Lin, H. F., & Lin, C. W. (2012). Development and Confirmatory Factory Analysis of the Achievement Task Value Scale for University Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(5), 482–492.
Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2002). A pilot validation of the class value assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N. J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Merenda, P. (1997). A guide to the proper use of Factor Analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and evaluation, 30, 156-163.
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. A. (2004). A model of future oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9–33. doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012343.96370.39
Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “x” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058-1066. doi: 10.1177/0956797611415540
Nasiriyan, A., Azar, H. K., Noruzy, A., & Dalvand M. R. (2011). A model of self-efficacy, task value, achievement goals, effort and mathematics achievement. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 612-618.
Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An Example using Sarason’s reactions to tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75-97. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1601_4
Pang, B. (2014). Promoting physical activity in Hong Kong Chinese young people: Factors influencing their subjective task values and expectancy beliefs in physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 20(3), 385-397. doi:10.1177/1356336x14534360
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupinsky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: exploring Control-Value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549. doi: 10.1037/a0019243
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: the achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis: conceptual and methodological basis. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 6(3), 71-80.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: Michigan, National Centre for Research to Improve
Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 810–814. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
Ramírez Dorantes, M. C., Canto y Rodríguez, J. E., Bueno Álvarez, J. A., & Echazarreta Moreno, A. (2013). Validación Psicométrica del Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Electronic Journal of Research
Educational Psychology, 29, 193-214.
Roces, C., Tourón, J., & González, M. C. (1995). Validación del CEAM II (Cuestionario de Estrategias de Aprendizaje y Motivación). Psicológica, 16(3), 347-366. Retrieved from http://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/19176/1/Validaci%C3%B3n%20preliminar%20del%20CEAM%20II.pdf
Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206. doi:10.1037/a0036981
Sánchez-Rosas, J. (2015a). The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Argentine (AEQ-AR): internal and external validity, reliability, gender differences and norm-referenced interpretation of test scores. Evaluar, 15, 41-74.
Sánchez-Rosas, J. (2015b). Validation of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire – Revised in Argentinean university students (A-AGG-R). International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(1), 10-23.
Sánchez-Rosas, J., & Bedis, J. (2015). Measuring Strategies to Cope with Boredom in Spanish Speaking Population: A Study with Argentinian University Students. Evaluar, 15, 99-122.
Sánchez-Rosas, J. & Esquivel, S. (2016). Instructional Teaching Quality, Task Value, Self-Efficacy, and Boredom: A Model of Attention in Class. Revista de Psicología, 25(2), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2017.44966
Sánchez-Rosas, J., & Pérez, E. (2015). Measuring threats, benefits, emotional costs and avoidance of academic help seeking in Argentinian university students. Pensamiento Psicológico, 13(2), 49-64. doi:10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi13-2.mtbe
Sánchez-Rosas, J., Piotti, A., Sánchez, V., Pereira, A., & Debat, E. (2011). Implicancias del interés, la importancia y la utilidad de los materiales y contenidos de aprendizaje para las emociones académicas. Presented at the III Congreso de Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. doi: 10.13140/2.1.4317.9526
Sánchez-Rosas, J., Takaya, P. B., & Molinari, A. V. (2016a). Atención en clase: rol predictivo del comportamiento docente, valor de la tarea, autoeficacia, disfrute y vergüenza. Psiencia. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 8(3). doi: 10.5872/psiencia/8.3.22
Sánchez-Rosas, J., Takaya, P. B., & Molinari, A. V. (2016b). The Role of Teacher Behavior, Motivation and Emotion in Predicting Academic Social Participation in Class. Pensando Psicología, 12(19), 39-53. doi: 10.16925/pe.v12i19.1327
Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347-363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and Learning from Text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257–279. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215-237. doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2.
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763-777. doi: 10.1037/a0027470
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task value: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of
achievement motivation (pp. 91-120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.
As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Pensando Psicología before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
