Aparatos de avance mandibular : ¿mito o realidad?
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
email: revista.odontologia@ucc.edu.co
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Ortodon.
email: revista.odontologia@ucc.edu.co
La mayoría de los pacientes con maloclusión clase II esquelética presentan posición retruida de la mandíbula. El término aparato funcional se refiere a aparatos fijos o removibles diseñados para alterar la posición mandibular sagital y verticalmente, resultando en cambios esqueléticos, ortodónticos y ortopédicos. A pesar de su larga historia, los aparatos funcionales continúan siendo controversiales en su uso, efectividad y modo de acción. Esta revisión permitirá conocer las diferentes alternativas de tratamiento para la maloclusión clase II esquelética causada por retrusión mandibular, entre los que están Bionator, Twin Block, Herbst, Jasper Jumper, Forsus, mara y Advansync, de los cuales se explicará su modo de acción, sus efectos a nivel dental y esquelético y el tiempo de tratamiento óptimo para conseguir estabilidad.
Kerr WJ, Miller S, Ayme B, Wilhelm N. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106(2): 115-20.
Woodside DG. The present role of the general practitioner in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1968; 1: 483-508.
Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod. 1951; 37(10): 751-68.
McNamara JA, Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51(3): 177-202.
Graber TR, Petrovic T. A orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatment. 5a. ed. Louis: Mosby; 2009.
Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 95(3): 250-8.
Grabowski T. Principios de anatomía y fisiología. 7ª. ed. Chicago: Harcout; 1998.
Netter FH. Atlas de anatomía humana. 4ª. ed. Barcelona: Elsevier-Masson; 2007, 2009.
Montenegro R. Factores que regulan la morfogénesis y el crecimiento mandibular humano. Int J Odontostomat. 2007; 1(1): 7-15.
Bjork A. Craneal base development. Am J Orthod. 1955; 41(198): 198-225.
Buschang PH, Gandini Junior LG. Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24(1): 69-79.
Gandini LG, Jr., Buschang PH. Maxillary and mandibular width changes studied using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(1): 75-80.
Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Transverse development of the craniofacial skeleton and dentition between 7 and 15 years of age. A longitudinal postero- anterior cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(1): 31-42.
Buschang PH, Santos-Pinto A. Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113(4): 437-42.
Enlow D. Essentials of facial growth. 2a. ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press; 2008.
Enlow DH, Harris DB. A study of postnatal growth of the mandible. Am J Orthodont. 1964; 50: 25-50.
Ruf S, Pancherz, H. When is the ideal period for herbst therapy- early or late? Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 47-56.
Lewis AB, Roche AF, Wagner B. Growth of the mandible during pubescence. Angle Orthod. 1982; 52(4): 325-42.
Ochoa BK, Nanda RS. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(2): 148-59.
Souza AM, Martinelli E. Mandibular growth during adolescence. Angle Orthodontist. 2006; 76(5): 1-9.
Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(3): 337-46.
Riesmeijer AM, Prahl-Andersen B, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KW. A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(4): 463-71.
Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(1): 125-37.
Oudet C, Petrovic A, Stutzmann J. Time-dependent effects of a ‘functional’-type orthopedic appliance on the rat mandible growth. Chronobiol Int. 1984; 1(1): 51-7.
Petrovic AG, Stutzmann JJ, Oudet CL. Control processes in postnatal growth of mandibular condyle cartilage. Rev Iberoam Ortod. 1986; 6(1): 11-58.
Bishara SE, Guardo CR. Ortodoncia. Ohio: McGraw- Hill; 2003.
Araujo AM, Buschang PH, Melo AC. Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy. An implant study. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(5): 515-22.
Rabie AB, Zhao Z, Shen G, Hagg EU, Dr O, Robinson W. Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibular advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119(4): 390-400.
Rabie AB, Shum L, Chayanupatkul A. vegf and bone formation in the glenoid fossa during forward mandibular positioning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(2): 202-9.
Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(3): 247-66.
Canut BL. Ortodoncia clínica y terapéutica. 2a. ed. Barcelona: Masson; 2000.
Whetten LL, Johnston LE, Jr. The control of condylar growth: an experimental evaluation of the role of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88(3): 181-90.
Graber TR, Petrovic, A. Ortopedia dentofacial con aparatos funcionales. 2a. ed. Buenos Aires: Panamericana; 1995.
Sood S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sood M, Gulati S. Neuromuscular adaptations with flexible fixed functional appliance. A 2-year follow-up study. J Orofac Orthop. 2011; 72(6): 434-45.
Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 139(1): 24-36.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA, Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118(2): 159-70.
Franchi L, Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics
followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(6): 950-4.
Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA, Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5): 599 e1- 12; discussion e1-6.
Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114(1): 15-24.
Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twinblock appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(1): 54-9.
Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Ursi W. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(1): 65-72.
Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA, Jr. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(3): 221-30.
Toth LR, McNamara JA, Jr. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116(6): 597-609.
Catálogo Dentaurum. 2013. http://www.dentaurum. de/files/989-965-20.pdf
Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance. Its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87(1): 1-20.
Pancherz H. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1981; 3(1): 49-60.
Pancherz H, Ruf S. The herbst appliance: research-based clinical management. Chicago: Quintessence, 2008.
Serbesis-Tsarudis C, Pancherz H. “Effective” tmj and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(5): 813-8.
De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA, Jr. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(4): 540-7.
Pancherz H, Fischer S. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(5): 493-501.
Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(6): 607-18.
Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982; 15: 189-96.
Martin J, Pancherz H. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic- cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(1): 44-51.
Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112(1): 92-103.
Herrera FS, Henriques JF, Janson G, Francisconi MF, de Freitas KM. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(2): e77-84.
Karacaya SA. Forsus nitinol flat spring and jasper jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 666-72.
Korrodi A. Los aparatos funcionales fijos, una clasificación actualizada. The Orthodontic Ciberjournal. 2001 june.http://orthocj.com/2001/06/los-aparatos-funcionales- fijos-una-clasificacin-actualizada/
American orthodontics. Complete AO product catalog en: www. americanortho.com/downloads/catalog/AOcatalog- 2011.pdf.
Nalbantgila DA. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the jasper jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 426-36.
Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the jasper jumper. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(3): 449-56.
Franchia L. Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the forsus fatigue resistant device in class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 678-83.
Vogt W. The forsus fatigue device. jco. 2006; 40(6): 368- 77; quiz 358.
Gunay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D. Evaluation of the Immediate Dentofacial Changes in Late Adolescent Patients Treated with the Forsus FRD. Eur J Dent. 2011; 5(4): 423-32.
Heinig N, Goz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop. 2001; 62(6): 436-50.
3M Unitek Catalog. www.3Munitekcatalog.Multimedia 3m.com
Sood S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sood M, Gulati S. Muscle response during treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011; 35(3): 331-8.
Ghislanzoni LT, Toll DE, Defraia E, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the Mandibular Advancement Repositioning Appliance; a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(4): 684-91.
Gonner U, Ozkan V, Jahn E, Toll DE. Effect of the mara appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop. 2007; 68(5): 397-412.
Al-Jewair TS, Preston CB, Moll EM, Dischinger T. A comparison of the mara and the AdvanSync functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(5): 907-14.
Pangrazio MN, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Bayirli B. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions. Angle Orthod Mar 21.Epub ahead of print.
Ormco Catalog. http://www.ormco.com/downloads/or mco-productcatalog.pdf
Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Baccetti T, Toll D, Defraia E, McNamara JA, Jr., Franchi L. Treatment timing of mara and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod Mar 15. Epub ahead of print.
Kulbersh VB. Tretment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped. 2003; 123: 286-95.
Perdomo AO. Cambios cefalométricos producidos por el aparato de avance mandibular, AdvanSync, en maloclusiones clase II. En proceso de publicación.
Gottfried P. Considerations of functional aspects in dentofacial orthopedics andorthodontics: Sheldon Friel Memorial lecture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(4): 373-81.
El autor debe declarar que su trabajo es original e inédito y que no se ha postulado a evaluación simultánea para su publicación por otro medio. Además, debe asegurar que no tiene impedimentos de ninguna naturaleza para la concesión de los derechos previstos en el contrato.
El autor se compromete a esperar el resultado de evaluación de la Revista Nacional de Odontología, antes de considerar su presentación a otro medio; en caso de que la respuesta de publicación sea positiva, adicionalmente, se compromete a responder por cualquier acción de reivindicación, plagio u otra clase de reclamación que al respecto pudiera sobrevenir por parte de terceros.
Asimismo, debe declarar que, como autor o coautor, está de acuerdo por completo con los contenidos presentados en el trabajo y ceder todos los derechos patrimoniales, es decir, su reproducción, comunicación pública, distribución, divulgación, transformación, puesta a disposición y demás formas de utilización de la obra por cualquier medio o procedimiento, por el término de su protección legal y en todos los países del mundo, al Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, de manera gratuita y sin contraprestación presente o futura.
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a
- Andrea Ocampo Parra, Natalia Parra Quintero, Paola María Botero Mariaca, Guía de erupción y extracción seriada , Revista Nacional de Odontología: Edición especial en Ortodoncia
- Carolina Cárdenas González, Yohana Cifuentes Jaramillo, Paola María Botero Mariaca, Catalina María Giraldo Guzmán, Importancia del análisis pulpar antes de realizar movimientos de ortodoncia , Revista Nacional de Odontología: Vol. 10 Núm. 19 (2014)
