Molding Work in Fixed Prosthesis
Introduction: molding is a fundamental step in a prosthetic rehabilitation treatment. It is the transfer of the clinical situation to the dental laboratory. There are numerous molding materials. Among them, we highlight the elastomers, which are non-aqueous elastic materials. They are: silicone polymerized by addition, silicone polymerized by condensation, polyether and polysulfide. The objective of this work is to present what is in the most updated literature pertinent to the subject, which includes a new reality for impressions of work in fixed prosthesis.
Methodology: the bibliographic survey was carried out using the electronic databases SciELO, Bireme and PubMed, using the keywords dental prosthesis; dental impression materials; dental impression technique and fixed prosthesis. Articles that included information relevant to the proposed theme were included.
Result: Regarding the dimensional stability of these materials, the most stable is the addition silicone, followed by polyether, polysulfide and, finally, condensation silicone. For the use of these materials, the dentist must have some impression techniques: impression technique with individual cap, repackaging or double printing technique, repacking technique with the use of previous relief and simultaneous or double mixing technique.
Conclusion: there is no consensus in the literature that elucidates which material and, mainly, the technique that should be recommended for performing the work impression. To minimize the issue, the professional must define which technique will be followed according to his ability, respecting his limitations and security regarding the procedure.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Revista Nacional de Odontologia before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Antunes RPA, et al. Avaliação da capacidade de cópia de materiais de moldagem elastoméricos de diferentes sistemas por meio de uma técnica aplicável clinicamente. Rev. Odontol. Univ. São Paulo. 1997 out/dez;11(4):263-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631997000400007.
Mesquita VT. Avaliação da alteração dimensional de técnicas de moldagem de trabalho em prótese fixa. Rev. Odontol. Clín. Cient. (online). 2012; 11(2).
American Dental Association. Council on Dental Materials Devices. Specification n.19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental impression materials. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1977; 94(4):733-41. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0334.
Almeida EES. Estudo da alteração dimensional de silicones para moldagem utilizando diferentes tipos de impressão. PCL. Curitiba.2003; 5(23):13-20.
Klee-Vasconcellos D. Moldagens de precisão em odontologia: Revisão de Literatura. PCL. 2005; 7(35):90-100.
Nissan J. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty wash impression techniques. JPD. 2000; 83(2):161-165. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80007-4
Johnson GH, Graig RG. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. JPD. 1985 abr; 53(4):484-490.
Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. JPD. 1986 fev; 55(2):197-203.
Marshak B. A controlled putty-wash impression technique. JPD. 1999 dez; 64(6):635-636.
Adabo GL. Estudo da precisão de modelos de gesso obtidos em moldes de silicona de condensação Optosil/Xantopren. Efeito de diferentes técnicas de moldagem. Rev. Odontol. UNESP. São Paulo. 1999; 28(2):359-367.
Cunha CO, Rezende CE, Pegoraro LF. Moldagem e modelo de trabalho. In: Pegoraro LF. Fundamentos de Prótese Fixa. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2014.
Martins BKL, Chain MC. Materiais para moldagem. In: Chain MC, editor. Materiais dentários. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2013.
Sinhoreti, MAC. Estudo da precisão dimensional de modelos de gesso confeccionados com deferentes técnicas e materiais de moldagem elastoméricos. Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de Passo Fundo. 2010; 15(2): 139-144.
Almeida EES. Estudo da alteração dimensional de silicones para moldagem utilizando diferentes tipos de impressão. Prótese Clínica Laboratorial. Curitiba. 2003; 5(23):13-203.
Mantovani RS. Fidelity of morfodimensional the IV model cast of condensation silicone for mold technique. R.P.G. Rev. Pós Grad. 2004; 11(1): 7-14.
Mesquita VT. Materiais e técnicas de moldagem em prótese fixa. Resco. 2012. 2(1): 45-55.
Chaimattayompol N, Park D. A modified put ty-wash vinyl polysiloxane impression technique for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(6): 483-5.
Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step put ty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99(4): 274-81. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60061-X.
Greco GD. Análise das alterações dimensionais de modelos de gesso obtidos com silicone de adição em múltiplos vazamentos. Arq Bras Odontol. 2009; 5(2):53-57.
Garcia LFR. Análise crítica dos fatores que influenciam a precisão de moldagens com elastômeros. Clin. Pesq. Odontol. Curitiba. 2006;2(5/6): 387-391.
Gomes SAT, Freitas CA, Marchese MP. Fidelidade de troqueis de gesso, obtidos a partir de moldes de um tipo de silicona de condensação com 3 diferentes espessuras, utilizando casquetes de resina acrílica. Rev Fac Odontol Lins. 2001; 13(2):64-8.
Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system. Quintessence Int. 2015 May;46(5):401-7. DOI: 10.3290/ j.qi.a 33685.
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;24(4):313-21. DOI: 10.1111. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12218.
Haim M, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H, Koch R, Walter MH, Quaas S. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22(3): 296-302. DOI: 10.1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60152-7.
Júnior T, Gonçalves EM, Almeida JC, Magalhães LM. Moldagem dupla para prótese fixa utilizando uma
silicona de condensação e um poliéter / Double impression for fixed denture using condensation silicon and a polyether: case report. Full Dent. Sci. 2012 jul.-set; 3(12): 457-461.
Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Macedo AP, Mattos MG, Ribeiro RF. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res. 2008; 22(4): 293-8. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242008000400002.
Kang AH, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Wataha JC. Accuracy of a reformulated fastset vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101(5):332-4. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600489.
Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, Won J. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58(1): 45-6.
Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1759-64. DOI: 10.1007.
Wiersema EJ, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH. De conventionele en de digitale afdrukmethode voor kronen en bruggen. / [The conventional and the digital impression method for single-unit and multi-unit fixed dental prostheses].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2013 Jul-Aug;120(7-8):401-10.
Cattoni F, Mastrangelo F, Gherlone EF, Gastaldi G. A New Total Digital Smile Planning Technique (3D-DSP) to Fabricate CAD-CAM Mockups for Esthetic. Int J Dent. 2016:455-460.
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wave-front sampling. J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):553-
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson H, Stevens C, Cohen B. 3D Digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dent. 2009;5(4):70-4. DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512010000500003.
Cook KT, Fasbinder DJ. Accuracy of CAD/CAM crown fit with infrared and LED cameras. Int J Comput Dent. 2012;15(4):315-26.
Gherlone E, Capparé P, Vinci R, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, Crespi R. Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for "All-on-Four" Restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31(2):324-30. DOI 27004280.
Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane Impressions. Int J Prosthodont. 2011; 24(1):49- 54.
Azer SS, Kerby RE, Knobloch LA. Effect of mixing methods on the physical properties of dental stones. J Dent. 2008; 36(9):736-44. DOI: 10.1016.
Butta R, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Moles DR. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(6):540-4.
Kumar D, Madihalli AU, Reddy KR, Rastogi N, Pradeep NT. Elastomeric impression materials: a comparison of accuracy of multiple pours. JCDP. 2011; 12(4):272-8.
Diego Raphael Cruz Martins Dias et al. Dimensão do alívio em técnica de dupla moldagem: uma revisão de literatura. Arquivo Brasileiro de Odontologia. 2016; 12(1).. DOI:334881375/360-1137-1-PB.
