• Research Articles

    Technological and social development projects as drivers for local innovation micro-ecosystems

    Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022)
    Published: 2022-05-15
    Roberto Giordano Lerena
    Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad FASTA
    Armando Fernández Guillermet
    Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata

    In Argentina, in 2013, the National Technological Scientific System incorporated an instrument, named Technological and Social Development Projects (PDTS, for its acronym in Spanish), to identify activities of technological development that had a social impact.

    PDTS arise from a concrete demand from a social actor, formally requesting the intervention of researchers to develop a technological solution to a problem.

    The objective of PDTS, the presence of actors and their relationships, create a space where the use and co-production of knowledge surpasses the scope of the original research objective, and can be extrapolated to other objects and issues. That co-produced knowledge adds value and innovation to the solution, characterizing it and making it unique with regards to local originality and identity. This process of co-producing knowledge builds skills in research and development groups, increasing the chance of generating new solutions to new problems, and creating a positive interaction spiral between university R+D and society. These interactions lead to “local innovation micro-ecosystems”.

    This paper considers the distinctive characteristics of the PDTS and the knowledge co-production space and examines how the recurrence of these types of projects can generate “local innovation micro-ecosystems” that contribute to the country’s innovation capacity. This study concludes with an example of a “local innovation micro-ecosystem” in the area of Computer Forensics.

    Keywords: technological development, innovation ecosystems, technological and social development projects, computer forensics

    How to Cite

    [1]
    R. Giordano Lerena and A. Fernández Guillermet, “Technological and social development projects as drivers for local innovation micro-ecosystems ”, ing. Solidar, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–25, May 2022, doi: 10.16925/2357-6014.2022.02.07.

    Comisión Asesora sobre Evaluación del Personal Científico y Tecnológico, Documento I de la Comisión Asesora sobre Evaluación del Personal Científico y Tecnológico: Hacia una redefinición de los criterios de evaluación del personal científico y tecnológico. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/documento-ii-de-la-comision-asesora-del-mctip.pdf

    Comisión Asesora sobre Evaluación del Personal Científico y Tecnológico, Documento II de la Comisión Asesora sobre Evaluación del Personal Científico y Tecnológico: Precisiones acerca de la definición y los mecanismos de incorporación de los Proyectos de Desarrollo Tecnológico y Social (PDTS) al Banco Nacional de Proyectos del MCTIP. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. 2013. [Online]. Available: www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/documento-i-de-la-comision-asesora-del-mctip_1.pdf

    R. Giordano Lerena, A. Fernández Guillermet, “Proyectos de Desarrollo Tecnológico Social en Argentina: un instrumento incompleto del Sistema Científico Tecnológico”, Libro de actas del 15° Congreso Argentino y 3° Congreso Latinoamericano de Ingeniería. Buenos Aires. Octubre, 2021.

    R. Giordano Lerena, “La necesidad de un sistema de evaluación para fortalecer los Proyectos de Desarrollo Tecnológico con impacto social en Argentina”, XI Congreso Universitario Internacional sobre Contenidos, Investigación, Innovación y Docencia. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Madrid. España. Octubre, 2021.

    J. Naidorf, F. Vasen, M. Alonso, “Academic evaluation and social relevance: the social and technological development projects (PDTS) as a science policy instrument,” Cadernos Prolam. USP, vol. 15, no. 27, pp. 43. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1676-6288.prolam.2015.103235

    J. Stilgoe, R. Owen, P. Macnaghten, “Developing a framework for responsible innovation,” Research Policy, vol. 42, pp. 1568. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

    M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow, “The New Production of Knowledge,” Sage Publications. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853

    D. Stokes, “Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation”. Brookings Institution Press. 1997.

    L. Beesley, “Science policy in changing times: Are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition?,” Research Policy, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00023-4

    C. H. Langford, M. W. Langford, “The evolution of the rules for access to megascience research environments viewed from Canadian experience,” Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00058-X

    H. Etzkowitz, “Networks of Innovation: Science, Technology and Development in the Triple Helix Era,” International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 1-1, pp. 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.1.1.7

    P. Van Den Besselaar, “Is S&T policy research transdisciplinary?”, Dissertation presented at the Triple Helix Conference. New York, 1998.

    J. Moore, “Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition,” Harvard Business Review Magazine, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition

    A. Andreu, “¿Qué es un ecosistema de innovación y qué roles existen?”, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.apd.es/ecosistema-de-innovacion-que-es-y-roles/

    R. Marrs, “Innovation Ecosystems: A new way of seeing (Part 1)”, p. 1. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://pointsofcontexture.typepad.com/points_of_contexture/2015/07/innovation-ecosystems-a-new-way-of-seeing-part-1.html

    M. Talmar, B. Walrave, K. Podoynitsyna, J. Holmström, G. Romme, “Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model,” Long Range Planning, vol. 53, no. 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002.

    M. Gobble, “Trazando el ecosistema de innovación”. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5437/08956308X5704005

    L. Thomas, E. Autio, “Innovation ecosystems”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337149363_Innovation_Ecosystems

    O. Granstrand, M. Holgersson, “Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition,” Technovation, vol. 90–91, 2020, pp. 102098. [Online]. Available: https://research.chalmers.se/publication/514457/file/514457_Fulltext.pdf

    F. Steinbruch, L. Nascimento, D. C. Menezes, “The role of trust in innovation ecosystems,” Business and industrial management magazine. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108 / JBIM-08-2020-0395

    R. Giordano Lerena, A. Di Iorio, B. Constanzo, A. Podestá, “InFo-Lab, un laboratorio mixto de investigación y desarrollo de tecnología en Informática Forense”. Anales del III Congreso Argentino de Ingeniería CADI 2016. Resistencia. Septiembre, 2016.

    R. Giordano Lerena et al, “InFo-Lab: Desarrollando Tecnología Nacional en Informática Forense”. Anales del Simposio de Informática en el Estado de las 47º Jornadas Argentinas de Informática. Buenos Aires, 2018

    D. Hurtado, “Jorge Sabato. Razón pragmática y cambio tecnológico en la encrucijada Desarrollo versus Dependencia”. Ediciones UNGS, 2021.

    MÉTRICAS
    ARTICLE VIEWS: 265
    PDF VIEWS: 270
    Metrics
    Metrics Loading ...
    https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/2357-6014.2022.02.07