Protección de los derechos de propiedad en las cuentas de juegos en línea
En este documento se examina la cuestión de la protección de los derechos de los usuarios, concretamente en lo que respecta a los usuarios de juegos en línea. Hoy en día, las normas de uso de las cuentas de juegos en línea están prescritas por los acuerdos de licencia, que son obligatorios para todo aquel que quiera acceder a un servicio digital. Sin embargo, estos acuerdos a menudo violan los derechos de los usuarios, otorgando amplias facultades a proveedores que abusan abiertamente de su posición. Una de las formas de proteger los derechos de los usuarios de cuentas de juego en línea es reconocer sus derechos de propiedad sobre los objetos del juego. Este enfoque es controvertido, pero existen argumentos que lo respaldan. Este artículo se centra en el estatus de las cuentas de juego en línea y de los objetos del juego como activos digitales, y examina la posibilidad de ampliar los derechos de propiedad a estos bienes. Asimismo, se analizan las problemáticas actuales relativas a los derechos e intereses de los usuarios frente a los proveedores de mundos virtuales, así como el panorama normativo vigente en materia de activos digitales, incluidas las cuentas de juegos en línea.
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 DIXI
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Da Cunha, N. (2010). Virtual property, real concerns. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(1), 35–72. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronintellectualproperty/vol4/iss1/2/
Dilla, W. N., Harrison, A. J., Mennecke, B. E., & Janvrin, D. (2013). The assets are virtual but the behavior is real: An analysis of fraud in virtual worlds and its implications for the real world. Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50571
European Commission. (2023). The Digital Services Act package. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package
European Law Institute. (2022). ELI principles on the use of digital assets as security: Report of the European Law Institute. https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Principles_on_the_Use_of_Digital_Assets_as_Security.pdf
Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047–1102. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=807966
Lastowka, G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.402860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3481444
Linklaters. (2023, June 5). Gaming series #2: Online safety and gaming – EU and UK approaches to regulation. https://techinsights.linklaters.com/post/102ig9a/gaming-series-2-online-safety-and-gaming-eu-and-uk-approaches-to-regulation
Lodder, A. R. (2013). Dutch Supreme Court 2012: Virtual theft ruling a one-off or first in a series? Journal of Virtual World Research, 6(3), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v6i3.7028
Nekit, K. (2020a). Legal aspects of the use of social media accounts: Current state and perspectives. Lawyer Quarterly, 10(3), 305–323. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3138456.stm
Nekit, K. (2020b). Social media account as an object of virtual property. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 14(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-3
Nelson, J. W. (2010). The virtual property problem: What property rights in virtual resources might look like, how they might work, and why they are a bad idea. McGeorge Law Review, 41, 281–310. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1805853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1805853
Palka, P. (2017). Virtual property: Towards a general theory (Doctoral dissertation, European University Institute). https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/49664
Prudour Private Limited. (2024, February 1). Online gaming market to hit USD 163.0 bn globally by 2032 at 10.2% CAGR. Enterprise Apps Today. https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/news/online-gaming-market-to-hit-usd-163-0-bn-globally-by-2032-at-10-2-cagr.html
Sheldon, D. P. (2007). Claiming ownership, but getting owned: Contractual limitations on asserting property interests in virtual goods. UCLA Law Review, 54, 751–787. https://www.uclalawreview.org/claiming-ownership-but-getting-owned-contractual-limitations-on-asserting-property-interests-in-virtual-goods/
Statista. (n.d.). Online games – Europe. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/media/games/online-games/europe
UNIDROIT. (2023). UNIDROIT principles on digital assets and private law. https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Principles-on-Digital-Assets-and-Private-Law-linked-1.pdf
Ward, M. (2003, September 29). Does virtual crime need real justice? BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3138456.stm
