Unión marital de hecho: análisis jurisprudencial desde el derecho a la igualdad para los compañeros permanentes

Martha I Pérez Estupiñán; Walter Guevara Vargas; José A Ariza García

doi:10.16925/di.v15i17.642

De facto Marital Union : a Jurisprudential Analysis from the Perspective of the Right to Equality for Partners

Derecho privado

https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v15i17.642

Martha I Pérez Estupiñán Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Walter Guevara Vargas Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

José A Ariza García Ver Biografía

Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

Sexual exploitation of children and teenagers is a degrading form of child labor that is one of today’s most serious human rights violations. Th aim of this study, carried out by reviewing national and international literature, is to propose policies and actions to effctively prevent and eradicate sexual exploitation of children and teenagers, ensuring their healthy and balanced physical, psychological, intellectual, moral and social development. It was completed by the “Minorities, Discrimination and Effctiveness” Research Group of the Masters Program on Rights at the Law Center at the Unisal of São Paulo (EU Lorraine). It was associated with the III Latin American Seminar on Human Rights, Multiculturalism and Diversity in Latin America. Th research began in 2011 and was completed in 2012.

Keywords: jurisprudential analysis, he family and the right to equality, de facto marital union, right to equality

Carlos Fradique Méndez. La familia frente a la ley y la vida. http://www.acj.org.co/o/activ_acad.php?mod=posesion%20fradique%20mendez. Enero del 2012.

Código de Procedimiento Civil [CPC]. (Colombia). Decre-tos número 1400 y 2019 de 1970. Agosto 6 y Octubre 26 de 1970.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-239 de 1994. (M.P. Jorge Arango Mejía: Mayo 19 de 1994).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-174 de 1996. (M.P. Jorge Arango Mejía: Abril 29 de 1996).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-075 del 2007. (M.P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil: Febrero 7 del 2007).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-283 del 2011. (M.P. Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub: Abril 13 del 2011).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-238 del 2012. (M.P. Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo: Marzo 22 del 2012).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-250 del 2012. (M.P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto: Marzo 28 del 2012).

Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. Auto del 28 de noviembre del 2001. (Expediente: 1999-482).

Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. Sala de Casación Civil. Proceso 2004-205. (M.P. Jaime Alberto Arrubla Paucar: Junio 18 del 2008).

Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. Sala de Casación Civil. Proceso 2002-197. (M.P. William Namén Vargas: Marzo 11 del 2009).

Daniel Bonilla. Corte Constitucional, igualdad y orientación sexual. http://www.viva.org.co/cajavirtual/svc0051/ar-ticulo02.pdf. Enero del 2012.

Diego Eduardo López Medina. El derecho de los Jueces. 2ed. Legis. (2006). John Rawls. La teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. (2006).

Jürgen Habermas. Facticidad y validez. Trotta. (1998).

H. Mazeaud, & J. Mazeaud. La familia. V. 4 P. II. Lecciones de derecho civil. Ediciones Jurídicas Europea-A.M. (1959).

Jurispedia: El Derecho Compartido. http://es.jurispedia.org/index.php/Lopez_Medina,_Diego_Eduardo. Enero 2012.

Pérez Estupiñán, M. I., Guevara Vargas, W., & Ariza García, J. A. (2014). De facto Marital Union: a Jurisprudential Analysis from the Perspective of the Right to Equality for Partners. DIXI, 15(17), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v15i17.642

Download Citation

Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.

In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 17 (2013)

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/di.v15i17.642