Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Alexander López Quiroz

doi:10.16925/di.v18i24.1521

Th Principle of Legality and Malfeasance

Derecho Constitucional

https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v18i24.1521

Alexander López Quiroz Ver Biografía

Universidad del Tolima

Purpose: To determine if malfeasance is possible when what has been called judicial precedent by the Constitutional Court of Colombia is not abided by.

Methodology: Ths article analyzes the existing norms of judicial precedent and, on this basis, whether it is lawful to try a public servant for malfeasance for departing from the doctrine of the high courts.

Viewpoint: Judicial precedent, or judicial legislation, is not legitimate law in Colombia; therefore, no malfeasance is committed when a judge departs from the rulings of the high courts.

Conclusions: According to the principle of legality and through induction, it is possible to demonstrate that the Constitutional Court lacks the functional competence to legislate, and its doing so constitutes malfeasance. Failure to give binding force to the doctrine of the high courts does not constitute malfeasance, as has been affied by the Constitutional Court of Colombia.

Keywords: civil law, common law, judicial precedent, malfeasance

Alfonso Reyes Echandia, Luis Enrique Aldana Rozo, Fabio Álvaro Gómez y Luna Calderón-Botero. Título del artículo. Jurisprudencia y doctrina xiii, 150. Fecha. Pág.

Barón de Montesquieu. Del espíritu de las leyes. Edito-rial Tecnos s. a. (1985).

Carl Schmitt. La Defensa de la Constitución. Estudio acerca de las diversas especies y posibilidades de salvaguarda de la Constitución. (1931). Editorial Labor s.a.

Carlos Bernal-Pulido. El derecho de los derechos. Editorial Universidad Externado de Colombia. (2008).

Código Civil Colombiano [ccc]. Editorial Legis s. a. (2009).

Corte Constitucional. Sentencia C-037 de 1996 (m p, Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa, mayo 2 de 1996).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia su 047 (m p,Carlos Gaviria Díaz, Alejandro Martínez Caballero, enero 29 de 1999).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-252/01 (m p, Carlos Gaviria Díaz, febrero 28 del 2001).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-836/01 (m p, Rodrigo Escobar Gil, agosto 9 del 2001).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-917/01 (mp, Alfredo Beltrán Sierra, Agosto 29 del 2001).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia SU-1330/01 (mp Marco Monroy Cabra, diciembre 6 del 2001).

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-086/07 (m p, Manuel Cepeda Espinosa, febrero 8 del 2007).

Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Pro-ceso 17088. (m p, José María Esguerra, diciembre 19 del 2000).

Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Penal. Radicado: 39456. (m p, José Luis Barceló Camacho, abril 10 del 2013).

Hans Kelsen. Teoría pura del Derecho. Editorial Porrúa. (2009).

Jose Hoyos, Alexander López y Rafael Peréz. Competencia de la Corte Constitucional. Una mirada desde el principio de legalidad. Precedente judicial, sentencias aditivas y sustitutivas. Editorial Poemia. (2012.).

Ley 153 de 1887. Por la cual se adiciona y reforman los códigos nacionales, la ley 61 de 1886 y la 57 de 1887. Agosto 28 de 1998. do n.o 7151 y 7152.

Ley 599 del 2000. Por la cual se expide el Código Penal. don.o 44097. Julio 24 del 2000.

Ley 1437 de 2011. Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Enero 18 del 2011. do n.o 47.956.

Pierre Bourdieu y Gunther Teubner. La racionalidad jurídica en crisis. Editorial Siglo del Hombre, Ediciones Uniandes, Instituto Pensar. (2000).

Wilson Herrera-Llanos. La rama legislativa del poder público en Colombia. Revista de derecho 20. 2003. Págs. 363-406.

López Quiroz, A. (2016). Th Principle of Legality and Malfeasance. DIXI, 18(24). https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v18i24.1521

Download Citation

Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.

In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 24 (2016)

Published

2016-08-22

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/di.v18i24.1521