Research Article

Psychological Portrait of a Contemporary Political Leader

Vol. 28 No. 2 (2026)
Published: 2026-07-06
Oleh Aharkov
Liudmyla Prisniakova
Oleksandr Samoilov
Mykola Nesprava
Tetiana Kovalenko

The purpose of the research is analysis of the psychological portrait of a contemporary political leader, using the examples of American presidents Joe Biden and Donald Trump. It was established that J. Biden and D. Trump represent different psychological types, which are reflected in their political decisions and leadership styles. J. Biden is characterized by logic, moderation, and a focus on cooperation with others. D. Trump is driven by emotions and is an impulsive leader. J. Biden is pedantic about details and motivated to cooperate. D. Trump actively used social networks, especially Twitter, to communicate with the public. He is characterized by emotionally colored statements that are echoed and attract the attention of the public. The following methods were used in the research: analysis of biographical sources, content analysis, comparative analysis of documents and political decisions, meta-analysis, and case studies. Conclusions. In the course of the research, differences in the personal characteristics and leadership style of J. Biden and D. Trump were revealed. J. Biden shows himself as a leader capable of achieving consensus, ready for compromises and cooperation with various interested parties. D. Trump is characterized by a more individualistic approach focused on strengthening his own position.

Keywords: Foreign experience, Psychological portrait, Psychological types, Psychology, Political leader

How to Cite

Aharkov, O., Prisniakova, L., Samoilov, O., Nesprava, M., & Kovalenko, T. (2026). Psychological Portrait of a Contemporary Political Leader. DIXI, 28(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2026.02.07

Baba, M. M., & Siddiqi, M. (2018). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership: A review of empirical studies. The Business Review, 22(1), 60-76. [https://bit.ly/4xlGSAz](https://bit.ly/4xlGSAz)

Caballo, V. E. (2017). A psychological analysis of Donald Trump. Behavioral Psychology, 25(1), 227-249. [https://bit.ly/4xwMHeD](https://bit.ly/4xwMHeD)

Glass, L. L., & Mass, N. (2023, June 16). What makes Trump act that way? A psychiatrist and a psychologist weigh in. The New York Times.

Greenfield, J. (2019, September 4). Biden’s a gaffe machine. Does that make him Gore—or Reagan? Politico.

Griebie, A. M., & Immelman, A. (2020, August). The personality profile and leadership style of U.S. President Donald J. Trump in office [Paper presentation]. Forty-Third Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany.

Griebie, A. M., & Immelman, A. (2021, July 11–13). The personality profile and leadership style of U.S. President Joe Biden [Paper presentation]. 44th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Virtual Conference.

Halaburda, N., Leheza, Y., Chalavan, V., Yefimov, V., & Yefimova, I. (2021). Compliance with the principle of the rule of law in guarantees of ensuring the legality of providing public services in Ukraine. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 29(4), 100-121.

Horbalinskiy, V., Leshchenko, O., Mashchenko, O., Leheza, Y., & Prymakov, K. (2023). Ways to protect the rights of individuals in administrative proceedings: Legal regulation and international experience. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(77), 324-334.

Hughes, I. (2020, November 1). The dangerous psychology of Donald Trump. OpenDemocracy.

Kobrusieva, Y., Leheza, Y., Rudoi, K., Shamara, O., & Chalavan, V. (2021). International standards of social protection of internally displaced persons: Administrative and criminal aspects. Jurnal Cita Hukum: Indonesian Law Journal, 9(3), 461-484.

Leheza, Y., Pisotska, K., Dubenko, O., Dakhno, O., & Sotskyi, A. (2022, December). The essence of the principles of Ukrainian law in modern jurisprudence. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 342-363.

Lewis, T. (2021, January 11). The ‘shared psychosis’ of Donald Trump and his loyalists. Scientific American.

Matviichuk, A., Shcherbak, V., Sirko, V., Malieieva, H., & Leheza, Y. (2022). Human principles of law as a universal normative framework. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(75), 221-231. [https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.14](https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.14)

McAdams, D. P. (2020). The strange case of Donald J. Trump: A psychological reckoning. Oxford University Press.

Michel, John W., Wallace, D. L., & Rawlings, R. A. (2013). Charismatic leaders: The role of admiration and system justification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(5), 469-487.

Odyntsova, I., Berezhna, K., Yuzikova, N., Leheza, Y., & Iliushchenko, H. (2021). International legal standards for providing public services in combating corruption. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 27(2), 275-291.

Roose, K. (2020, April 16). Biden is losing the internet. Does that matter? The New York Times.

Rubin, J. (2020, July 31). Joe Biden’s ‘simpatico’ trap. The Washington Post.

Tumulty, K. (2019, April 1). Joe Biden needs to cut it out. So does the mob. The Washington Post.

Tylchyk, V., Matselyk, T., Hryshchuk, V., Lomakina, O., Sydor, M., & Leheza, Y. (2022). Administrative and legal regulation of public financial activity. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(72), 573-581. [https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.33](https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.33)

Villasmil, E., Leheza, Y., & Holovii, L. (2022). Reflections for the interdisciplinary study of the Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73), 16-24. [https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.00](https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.00)

Zadyraka, N., Leheza, Y., Bykovskyi, M., Zheliezniak, Y., & Leheza, Y. (2023). Correlation of legal concepts of administrative procedure and administrative liability in the sphere of urban planning. Jurnal Cita Hukum: Indonesian Law Journal, 11(1), 33-44.

Zhukova, Y., Bryl, K., Svystun, L., Kobrusieva, Y., & Leheza, Y. (2023). Legal regulation of public administration of education and science. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(76), 336-346.

MÉTRICAS
ARTICLE VIEWS: 47
PDF VIEWS: 37