Smearing the trundles of legal aid in Cameroon
reconsidering the need in appraising the legal framework
The provision of legal aid to indigent defendants in criminal proceedings in Cameroon faces numerous operational and legal challenges. Despite the country’s ratification of key international legal instruments recognizing the need to provide legal aid in criminal cases—particularly for the accused—its policies for incorporating the right to legal aid into domestic legislation and other enabling laws remain problematic. Various oversight deficiencies hinder the effective implementation of public legal aid schemes, particularly in criminal proceedings. As a result, a significant number of accused persons, often unfamiliar with the complexities of the adversarial criminal justice system, are compelled to represent themselves, putting their legal rights at serious risk. This article argues that enhancing the legal aid system and ensuring its sustainability in Cameroon’s criminal justice process can only be achieved through a comprehensive review of the normative framework governing the right to legal aid and its implementation under public legal aid schemes. The article concludes that the legal and regulatory frameworks governing legal aid in Cameroon suffer from serious shortcomings, which have undermined the country’s limited efforts to fulfil its international obligations to provide state-funded counsel to indigent defendants. Additionally, the article contributes to the broader discourse on the promotion of legal aid in Cameroon’s criminal justice system, where existing research has predominantly focused on inadequate funding as the primary cause of its inefficiency.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Legal Aid Conference. (2004). Criminal justice as to the declaration and assessment of legal aid in the criminal justice system in Africa. Lilongwe. https://www.penalreform.org/resource/lilongwe-declaration-accessing-legal-aid-criminal-justice-system/
Kamto, M. (1996). Révision constitutionnelle en écriture d’une nouvelle constitution. Lex Lata, 023-024(Février/Mars), 17-20. https://shs.cairn.info/introduction-au-droit-constitutionnel--9782340040144
Melone, S., & Minkoa, A. S. (1996). La réforme constitutionnelle du 18 janvier 1996 au Cameroun: Aspects juridiques et politiques. Fondation Friedrich Ebert AASP, GRAPS. Yaoundé. https://www.assnat.cm/images/La_Constitution.pdf
Neumayer, E. (2001). Greening trade and investment: Environmental protection without protectionism. Earthscan Publication. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315093383/greeningtrade-investment-eric-neumayer
Olinga, A. D. (1996). L’aménagement des droits et libertés dans la constitution camerounaise révisée. Revue Université Droits de l’Homme, Strasbourg, 116-126. https://journals.openedition.org/crdf/9453
Roberts, P., & Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal evidence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Criminal-Evidence-Paul-Roberts/dp/0198824483
Tamasang, C. F. (2007). Community forest management entities as effective tools for local level participation under Cameroonian law: A case study of Kilum/Ijim Mountain Forest (Doctoral dissertation, University of Yaoundé II-Soa).
