The phenomenon of understanding the conceptual principles of evidence in criminal proceedings regarding corruption offenses in Ukraine
A systematic analysis of judicial practice reveals that gathering evidence in criminal proceedings related to corruption and corruption-related offenses is an exceptionally complex and multidimensional process. This complexity stems primarily from the inherently multifaceted nature of corruption in the modern scientific discourse. Additionally, over the past decade, there has been an ongoing effort to redefine and enhance anti-corruption measures within the state. Key institutions such as the Asset Tracing and Management Agency, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, and the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine play a pivotal role in addressing corruption-related offenses.
The guiding principles for combating corruption in a legally compromised environment are regarded as top priorities, as they form the foundation for investigative and prosecutorial procedures. These principles define the procedural framework, the specific characteristics of investigative and covert operations, and the primary challenges associated with conducting them. Some core conceptual principles include: the extreme complexity of proof in criminal proceedings on corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses in Ukraine; compliance with the requirements of national and international human rights standards; the complex nature of investigative (detective) actions and covert investigative (detective) actions; and interaction with the public.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Bortnyk, S. M., & Sievidova, I. O. (2023). Ensuring organisational and legal conditions for financing the social sector of Ukraine. Law and Safety, 3(90), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.01
Case No. 663/267/19. Resolution of the panel of judges of the Third Judicial Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court (25.08.2021). http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=99277907&red=1000030a80342a82ea5ce3d7ec131cff545bb3&d=5
Case No. 754/7061/15. Resolution of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court (22.02.2021). https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/95139651
Cherviakova, O. V. (2023). Transitional justice mechanisms and processes: International experience for restoring Ukraine’s sovereignty and national security. Law and Safety, 3(90), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.11
Dion, M. (2010). What is corruption corrupting? A philosophical viewpoint. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 13(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201011010209
Dniprov, A. (2020). Conceptual fundamentals of executive power activity in Ukraine. Bulletin of the Academy of Labor, Social Relations and Tourism, 3-4, 35–40.
Dzhafarova, O. V., Shatrava, S. O., & Pohorilets, O. V. (2023). Peculiarities of determining the circle of recipients of one-time financial assistance in case of death of a serviceman, person liable for military service or reservist under martial law. Law and Safety, 3(90), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.08
Fedotov, O., & Voloshyna, M. (2019). Reformation of the institutional anti-corruption system in the context of European integration transformation. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 224–232.
Harasymiw, B. (2019). Civil society as an anti-corruption actor in post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 61(3), 288–320.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2023). Interpretation and application of Article 404 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on court initiative: Case law of the Criminal Court of Cassation. Law and Safety, 3(90), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.07
Komissarchuk, Yu. A. (2011). Definition and content of criminal procedure evidence. Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 333–343.
Kotukov, O., Kotukova, T., Kozlov, K., Makarenko, O., & Odyntsova, O. (2023). The effectiveness of the national anti-corruption policy of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 12(66), 304–313.
Kyrieieva, I. V. (2023). Liability issues for environmental damage caused by military aggression of a terrorist country. Law and Safety, 3(90), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.15
Naida, V. O., & Kuzubova, T. O. (2021). Interaction of the investigator, inquirer with civil society institutions during pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses. In: International Scientific-Practical Conference, Kherson, 26 February, 180–183.
Nosov, V. V., Manzhai, O. V., & Kovtun, V. O. (2023). Technical, forensic and organisational aspects of work with Monero cryptocurrency. Law and Safety, 3(90), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.09
Paryzkyi, I., Balon, A., Udovychenko, O., Tumalavicius, V., & Shvedova, H. (2023). The dynamics of the fight against corruption in Ukraine: Achievements, challenges, and ways to overcome. Revista Brasileira De Direito, 19(3). https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4989
Pavlenko, N. V. (2023). Ukraine’s debt security in the context of military conflict. Law and Safety, 3(90), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.13
Pchelin, V. B., & Zvirianskyi, G. V. (2023). Legal regulation features of legal liability of the Bureau of Economic Security of Ukraine employees. Law and Safety, 3(90), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.03
Petrovska, S. A., & Petrovskyi, M. V. (2023). Analysis of the Ukrainian legislation on labour protection adaptation to the European Union acts. Law and Safety, 3(90), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.04
Pevko, S. G. (2023). Axiology of law in civil society. Law and Safety, 3(90), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.12
Prokopenko, O. Yu. (2023). Peculiarities of the special knowledge application in the investigation of taking a government official or law enforcement officer as hostage. Law and Safety, 4(91), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.4.12
Salmanova, O. Yu., & Shovkun, Yu. I. (2023). The genesis of restrictions and special requirements established during public service. Law and Safety, 3(90), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.05
Shcherbakovskyi, M., Stepaniuk, R., Kikinchuk, V., Oderiy, O., & Svyrydova, L. (2020). Evidentiary problems in the investigation of corruption crimes in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(32), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.32.08.12
Šimić, G. (2023). War crimes and spirituality: To prosecute or to forgive and reconcile. Law and Safety, 3(90), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.2.06
Stepaniuk, R. L., Kikinchuk, V. V., & Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2021). Proving corruption in the investigative and judicial practice of Ukraine: Problems and solutions. Law and Safety, 80(1), 101–108.
Sverdlin, K. Yu. (2023). The concept and features of staffing of the State Criminal Executive Service and probation bodies in Ukraine. Law and Safety, 3(90), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.3.10
