Protection of property rights in online gaming accounts
This paper considers the issue of users’ rights protection, namely regarding the users of online games. Nowadays, the rules for using online gaming accounts are prescribed by the license agreements, which are mandatory for everyone who wants to get access to digital service. However, such agreements oftentimes break the users’ rights, giving large possibilities for providers who are openly abusing users. One of the ways to protect rights of users of online gaming accounts is to recognize their property rights regarding the in-game items. This approach is highly debatable, but there are arguments in favor of such. This paper is focusing on the status of online gaming accounts and in-game items as digital assets and looks into the possibility to extend property rights to these objects. Current issues regarding the rights and interests of users in relation to virtual world providers are also discussed, as well as the current regulatory landscape for digital assets, including online gaming accounts, which is briefly reviewed.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Da Cunha, N. (2010). Virtual property, real concerns. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(1), 35–72. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronintellectualproperty/vol4/iss1/2/
Dilla, W. N., Harrison, A. J., Mennecke, B. E., & Janvrin, D. (2013). The assets are virtual but the behavior is real: An analysis of fraud in virtual worlds and its implications for the real world. Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50571
European Commission. (2023). The Digital Services Act package. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package
European Law Institute. (2022). ELI principles on the use of digital assets as security: Report of the European Law Institute. https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Principles_on_the_Use_of_Digital_Assets_as_Security.pdf
Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047–1102. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=807966
Lastowka, G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.402860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3481444
Linklaters. (2023, June 5). Gaming series #2: Online safety and gaming – EU and UK approaches to regulation. https://techinsights.linklaters.com/post/102ig9a/gaming-series-2-online-safety-and-gaming-eu-and-uk-approaches-to-regulation
Lodder, A. R. (2013). Dutch Supreme Court 2012: Virtual theft ruling a one-off or first in a series? Journal of Virtual World Research, 6(3), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v6i3.7028
Nekit, K. (2020a). Legal aspects of the use of social media accounts: Current state and perspectives. Lawyer Quarterly, 10(3), 305–323. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3138456.stm
Nekit, K. (2020b). Social media account as an object of virtual property. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 14(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-2-3
Nelson, J. W. (2010). The virtual property problem: What property rights in virtual resources might look like, how they might work, and why they are a bad idea. McGeorge Law Review, 41, 281–310. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1805853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1805853
Palka, P. (2017). Virtual property: Towards a general theory (Doctoral dissertation, European University Institute). https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/49664
Prudour Private Limited. (2024, February 1). Online gaming market to hit USD 163.0 bn globally by 2032 at 10.2% CAGR. Enterprise Apps Today. https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/news/online-gaming-market-to-hit-usd-163-0-bn-globally-by-2032-at-10-2-cagr.html
Sheldon, D. P. (2007). Claiming ownership, but getting owned: Contractual limitations on asserting property interests in virtual goods. UCLA Law Review, 54, 751–787. https://www.uclalawreview.org/claiming-ownership-but-getting-owned-contractual-limitations-on-asserting-property-interests-in-virtual-goods/
Statista. (n.d.). Online games – Europe. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/media/games/online-games/europe
UNIDROIT. (2023). UNIDROIT principles on digital assets and private law. https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Principles-on-Digital-Assets-and-Private-Law-linked-1.pdf
Ward, M. (2003, September 29). Does virtual crime need real justice? BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3138456.stm
