The right to respect for private life
ukrainian approach and European Court of Human Rights practice
The right to respect for private life is one of the fundamental values in modern society. That is why it is important to ensure its reliable protection. In European practice, in particular, in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (echr), clear approaches to understanding the essence and constituent elements of the right to private life have been elaborated. However, in Ukraine, despite the establishment of the right to private (personal) life at the constitutional level, the approach to its ensuring is not perfect. In Ukraine, there is no clear definition of the scope and constituent elements of the right to private life, there are ongoing discussions regarding the very concept of “private life”. To improve the current situation in Ukraine, it is worth taking into account the echr practice, which clearly defines the content and constituent elements of the right to private life. It is also necessary to consider the echr practice when ensuring the right to personal data protection, which is an important element of the right to respect for private life. The personal data protection in Ukraine also needs some improvements based on modern European practice in order to bring it into line with European standards.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
В. В. Тертишник. Особисте життя людини та проблеми правосуддя [Personal Life of a Person and Problems of Justice]. Права нотаріуса, no. 6. 2005. P. 24-32.
В. C. Серьогін. Приватне життя як об’єкт конституційного права на недоторканність приватного життя [Private Life as an Object of the Constitutional Right to Inviolability of Private Life]. Вісник Академії правових наук України, vol. 1, no. 64. 2011. P. 51-62.
С. C. Шевчук. Судовий захист прав людини: Практика Європейського Суду з прав людини у контексті західної правової традиції [Judicial Protection of Human Rights: Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the Context of the Western Legal Tradition]. Правова єдність. (2007).
Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of January 28, 1981. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/mrnr8wpf
European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation. Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Ukraine of 27.06.2016. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2yshuxw4
Koldo Casla. The Rights We Live In: Protecting the Right to Housing in Spain through Fair Trial, Private and Family Life and Non-Retrogressive Measures. International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 20, no. 3. 2016. P. 285-297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1073716
Katerina Nekit, Denis Kolodin, Valentyn Fedorov. Personal Data Protection and Liability for Damage in the Field of the Internet of Things. Juridical Tribune, vol. 10, no. 1. 2020. P. 80-93.
О. В. Легка. Актуальні питання захисту персональних даних: вітчизняний та міжнародний досвід. [Actual Issues of Personal Data Protection: Domestic and International Experience]. Правова позиція, vol. 2, no. 31. 2021. P. 74-79.
О. В. Стогова. Особисте життя людини: проблема визначення [Personal Life of a Person: the Problem of Definition]. Правовий вісник Української академії банківської справи, vol. 1, no. 10. 2014. P. 6-10.
О. О. Андрієвська. Охорона та захист прав на приватне життя особи [Protection of the Rights to a Person’s Private Life]. Часопис Академії адвокатури України, no 14. 2012. P. 1-6.
О.П. Горпинюк. Стан дослідження проблеми кримінально-правової охорони приватності в юридичній літературі [The State of Research of the Problem of Criminal-Law Protection of Privacy in Legal Literature]. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ, no 4. 2009. P. 198–206.
П.М. Рабінович, М.І. Хавронюк. Права людини і громадянина [The Rights of Human and Citizen]. Атіка. (2004).
Ю. М. Кириченко. Конституційне закріплення права на невтручання в особисте і сімейне життя в Україні та європейськи ких державах: порівняльно-правовий аналіз [Constitutional Consolidation of the Right to Non-Interference in Personal and Family Life in Ukraine and European Countries: A Comparative Legal Analysis]. Наукові записки Інституту законодавства Верховної Ради України, no. 5. 2013. P. 34-40.
Silvina Álvarez Medina. La interferencia estatal en la vida privada y familiar. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, no. 42. 2020. P. 1-23. https://tinyurl.com/53zz24de
V. I. Galagan, S. Y. Ablamskyi, Z. V. Udovenko, V. V. Ablamska. Judicial Control as a Guarantee of Non-Interference in Private Life During the PreTrial Investigation: An Observation under the European Court of Human Rights. dixi, vol. 23, no. 2. 2021. P. 27-35. Available at: https://tinyurl.
com/3ezc4dub
