Weighting, suitability, obedience and discretion make judges in Colombia see the law backwards
Title and scope: The conventionality control established by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights must be understood as the way in which the State addresses its obligations regarding the respect and guarantee of human rights. It is a mechanism for protection and for making fundamental rights effective and inherent to the human being, enshrined in the various sources of Public International Law, mainly in international treaties. Characteristics: Colombia, despite having a Constitution that guarantees and is based on human dignity, applies this mechanism at the discretion, almost at the judges’ will. Findings: A State Party has the legal duty to adopt the necessary measures to fulfill its obligations in accordance with the treaty, whether executive, legislative, judicial, or of another nature, for the protection of the concerned right. The three branches of government in Colombia do not recognize and apply that procedural requirements are indispensable for the integration of the process and for issuing the judgment that addresses the substance of the matter, essentially due to lack of knowledge on these topics. Conclusions: The Colombian Council of State, the Supreme Court of Justice, and the Constitutional Court, when issuing their rulings, do not effectively apply the conventionality control of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Eugenio Lahera. El papel del Estado y el gobierno en el desarrollo. Antecedentes para el análisis de la posición de la Cepal. Publicaciones de la Cepal. (1997). Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/11362/34629
Jairo Andrés Castaño Peña. El control de convencionalidad en Colombia. Estudio de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional y el Consejo de Estado. Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 197. Julio-septiembre 2022. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.197.09
Juan Antonio García Amado. Decidir y argumentar sobre derechos. Tirant lo Blanch. (2017).
Juan Carlos Hitters. Control de constitucionalidad y control de convencionalidad. Comparación (criterios fijados por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos). Estudios Constitucionales, vol. 7, núm. 2. 2009. pp. 109-128. Disponible en: http://tinyurl.com/4mrahw5w
Laura Díaz-Bravo, Uri Torruco-García, Mildred Martínez-Hernández, Margarita Varela-Ruiz. La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en Educación Médica, vol. 2, núm. 7. Julio-septiembre 2013. Disponible en: http://tinyurl.com/4zma8ah4
Louis Favoreau. Legalidad y constitucionalidad: la constitucionalización del derecho. Trad. Magdalena Correa Henao. Editorial Universidad Externado. (2000).
Nelsy Andrea Aponte Vargas. Alcance constitucional y aplicación del control de convencionalidad en los fallos judiciales en Colombia (tesis de especialización, Universidad Libre de Colombia). 2023. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/10901/24152
Néstor L. Guzmán. Discrecionalidad y justificación. Editorial Astrea. (2019).
Perfecto Andrés Ibáñez, Robert Alexy. Jueces y ponderación argumentativa. IIJ-UNAM. (2006).
Yezid Carrillo de la Rosa. La inclusión de la moral en el derecho y la encrucijada actual del positivismo jurídico. Diálogos de Saberes, núm. 31. 2009. Disponible en: http://tinyurl.com/44huzedf
