Secular state and expression of faith from the public
The limit between religion and impartiality by high ranking officials
Introduction: The principle of constitutional secularism, as a legal guarantee, entails religious freedom at its core given its recognition as a fundamental right. It is institutionally and politically correct in terms of respect and tolerance. However, senior State officials warn how, in the midst of the legitimate exercise of the administrative function, speeches with a marked Catholic religious context are publicly resorted to. As an analytical and supportive exercise, two specific facts are used that show the unjustified violation of said principle, in terms of protection against the president and vice president of Colombia in the four-year period 2018-2022. Without a doubt, it is pertinent to highlight that, especially the Constitutional Court through Ruling T-124 of 2021, set a precedent and ultimately ensured the validity of a secular State where in some way the inveterate connection between the State and the Catholic Church does not prevail. The article opens the imperative debate from and towards the public and the citizen, religious or not, in search of minimum respect for the principle of secularism, in this case by high-ranking officials.
Purpose: The principle of secularism, constitutionally and legally enshrined, seems not to have sufficient popular roots to respect openly opposed religious and minority tendencies. It is necessary to identify its true fundamental core as a principle, which allows for more rigorous rules, especially in the face of religious manifestations by high-ranking officials.
Description: The history of Colombia has been marked by a strong State-Catholic Church bond. With the advent of the constitutional State and the course of respect and safeguarding of human rights as a limit to power, this union was diluted. The current principle of secularism aims to respect any religious manifestation or belief. However, with the approval of some judicial decisions in the closing phase, the adherence to certain positions and decisions of high public leaders is apparently safeguarded, as well as their inclination towards religiosity, even when it is believed that it has already been overcome.
Perspectives: The consecration and legal development, although punctual, of the principle of secularism or religious impartiality call into question the separation of the State and religion. Although respect for all religion is constitutionally recognized, its rules still guarantee to protect the believer and not the agnostics or atheists under the same conditions.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Albert Camus. Calígula (Obra en cuatro actos). Alianza Editorial. (1996).
Andrés Pérez Baltodano. Providencialismo y discurso político de Nicaragua. Revista Nueva Sociedad 260. Noviembre-diciembre 2013.
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. Constitución Política de Colombia. Legis. (1991).
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. Gaceta Constitucional Número 40. Abril 8 de 1991. Disponible en: https://babel.banrepcultural.org/digital/collection/p17054coll26/id/3818/
Chaim Perelman, Olbrechts Tyteca L. Tratado de la argumentación. La nueva retórica. Editorial Gredos. (1989).
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, Sección Primera. Sentencia 11001-03-24-000-2011-00268-00. (Noviembre 12 de 2015). Disponible en: https://vlex.com.co/vid/615468054
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-350/94. (M.P. Alejandro Martínez Caballero; agosto 4 de 1994).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia c-152/03. (M.P. Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa; febrero 25 de 2003).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-124/21. (M.P. Diana Fajardo Rivera; mayo 4 de 2021).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Laboral. Sentencia STL 5798-2020. (M.P. Iván Mauricio
Lenis Gómez; agosto 19 de 2020). Disponible en: https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/STL5798-2020.pdf
Gonzalo F. Fernández. Estado laico, laicidad y laicismo. Foro Educacional 34. 2020. Pág. 149-158. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.29344/07180772.34.2366
Jairo Vargas León. Aporías al consenso moral en el mundo unipolar. dixi 20. 2014. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.16925/di.v16i20.830
Javier Fisac Seco. Dios, poder y libertad. Una reflexión sobre la voluntad de poder. Lulu.com. (2016).
Johanna del Pilar Cortés Nieto. Itinerario de la jurisprudencia colombiana de control constitucional como mecanismo de protección de derechos humanos. Editorial Universidad del Rosario. (2009).
Jordi Nieva Fenoll. La ideología de los jueces. La Marea. (2018).
Juan Pablo Domínguez Angulo. La seguridad social como profundización de la individualidad. Dixi 15. 2012. Disponible en: https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/di/article/view/1012
Ley 133 de 1994. Por la cual se desarrolla el Decreto de Libertad Religiosa y de Cultos, reconocido en el artículo 19 de la Constitución Política. Mayo 23 de 1994. Diario Oficial 41.369.
Muel Calleja Salado. El derecho de resistencia de Thomas Jefferson dentro del contexto de la independencia y en el desarrollo constitucional de los Estados Unidos. Editorial Universidad de Sevilla. (2019).
Omar Alejandro Alvarado Bedoya. Laicidad y secularización: la tarea pendiente en la democracia colombiana. Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 21. 2015. Pág. 583-603.
Óscar Alarcón Núñez. La cara oculta de la Constitución del 91. Editorial Planeta Colombia. (2011).
Oswaldo Plata Pineda. Religión y política en el Leviatán de Thomas Hobbes. Praxis Filosófica 23. Agosto de 2006.
Pedro Antonio García Obando, Javier Orlando Aguirre Román, Mauricio Albarracín Caballero. ¿A quién le habla la Corte Constitucional Colombiana? El juez y el auditorio universal. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas 110. Enero-junio 2009. Pág. 77-95. Disponible en: https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/derecho/article/view/3865
Pedro J. Chamizo Domínguez. La función social y cognitiva del eufemismo y del disfemismo. Panace@ 15. Marzo de 2004. Disponible en: https://www.tremedica.org/wp-content/uploads/n15_tribuna-ChamizoDominguez.pdf
Pedro Salazar Ugarte. La laicidad: antídoto contra la discriminación. Consejo Nacional para la Discriminación. (2007).
Real Academia Española (rae). Diccionario panhispánico de dudas. rae. (2005). Disponible en: https://www.rae.es/dpd
Rubén Jaramillo Vélez. Colombia: la modernidad postergada. Rivas Moreno. (1994).
William Irwin, Mark T. Corad, Aeon J. Skoble. Los Simpson y la filosofía. Blackie Books. (2009).
William Mauricio Beltrán. Descripción cuantitativa de la pluralización religiosa en Colombia. Universitas Humanísitica 75. Enero-julio 2012. Disponible en: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/11099
William Renán Rodríguez. El Estado laico en Colombia: un análisis de sus orígenes. Editorial Universidad Externado. (2020).
