Communication of the victim in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine in the conditions of martial law
The article examines the doctrinal understanding of the concept of ‘communication’ in criminal procedural law. It was concluded that communication in the criminal process (criminal-procedural communication) is an end-to-end exchange of information, which is characteristic of the criminal-procedural communicative space of both law-making and law-enforcement spheres. In a broad sense, it consists in law enforcement (judicial, doctrinal) interpretation before, during and after the application of the criminal procedural norm. In a narrow sense, this is the exchange of procedurally significant information by the participants of criminal procedural activities between themselves and the court in connection with the progress of criminal proceedings. Such an exchange consists in the provision of information, joint participation in the conduct of procedural actions and their mutual perception of each other, which is implemented in the procedural forms provided for by law. It is noted that the implementation of criminal proceedings in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine reinforces the relevance of the problem of the victim’s communication. It also requires the creation of human rights sectoral mechanisms that would ensure the protection of the victim’s rights. In particular, regarding compensation for damage caused to him/her as a result of criminal offenses due to the conduct of military operations on the territory of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the reloading of the ‘image of the victim’ in criminal procedural law should take place on the basis of the victim-centered approach proposed by the Advisory Mission of the European Union in Ukraine.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
A. Tokarska. Legal Communication in the Context of Post-Classical Legal Understanding. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyiv National University of Internal Affairs. 2008. P. 117.
D. Kislov. Marketing Communication as a Mechanism for the Implementation of State Policy. Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. (2018).
H. Didkivska. International Experience of the Legal Position of the Victim in Criminal Proceedings. In: Criminal Procedure Code 2012: Ideology and Practice of Law Enforcement. Helvetica Publishing House. (2018). P. 187-188.
I. Rakipova. Human Rights Communication of the Victim in Criminal Proceedings of Ukraine. Helvetica Publishing House. (2021).
I. Rakipova, O. Torbas, V. Voloshyna, D. Shylin, A. Pidgorodynska. Ensuring Rights of Victims Under the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Current Issues and Prospects. Precedente 1. 2023. P. 133.
M. Ostrovska. Combating Crime through Improving the Procedural Status of the Victim. National Academy of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine. (2018). P. 63.
M. Pohoretskyi, D. Sergeeva. Problematic Issues of Implementation of the Procedural Status of the Victim in Criminal Proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University 2. 2017. P. 120.
O. Kaplina. Armed Aggression: Whether the Victims Will be Compensated for the Damage Caused within the Criminal Proceedings. In: Criminal Justice in Ukraine: Realities and Prospects. Institute of Law at University of Latvia. 2022. P. 164.
O. Melnychuk. Dictionary of Foreign Words. Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia. (1974).
O. Shchygol. Transformation of Guarantees of the Rights of the Victim during Martial Law: Praxeological Aspect. In: Criminal Justice in Ukraine: Realities and Prospects. Institute of Law at University of Latvia. (2022). P. 255.
V. Honcharov. Dynamic Interpretation of Legal Norms. Spolom. (2013).
V. Shinkaruk. Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Abrys. (2002).
V. Tulyakov. Victim of Crime Doctrine: Social and Legal Fundamentals. Doctoral Dissertation, Odesa National Law Academy. 2001. P. 19.
Yu. Gurdji. Legal Protection of a Person in the Criminal Process of Ukraine: Theory and Methodology. Doctoral Dissertation, Odesa National Law Academy. 2007. P. 91
