Legal regulation of foreign affairs governance
foreign experience for Ukraine
The organization of foreign affairs governance in different countries reveals differences in approaches to legal regulation in the status, competence, structure and principles of interaction of foreign affairs governance bodies. This is primarily due to the peculiarities of the form of government and the state system, the practice of public administration and current foreign policy goals. The advantages and shortcomings of the organization of foreign affairs governance in different countries should be one of the main sources of optimizing the foreign affairs governance of Ukraine. That is why the purpose of this article is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to the legal regulation of foreign affairs governance, to determine features of the legal status of subjects of foreign affairs governance in different countries, as well as to substantiate the priority areas for improving the organization of foreign affairs governance in Ukraine. This leads to the use of dialectical, formal-legal, comparative-legal, system-structural, logical-semantic and other scientific methods. Effective implementation of foreign policy requires a modern constructive organization of foreign affairs governance, taking into account the peculiarities of the state system, foreign policy interests and potential of the state, as well as progressive trends and positive experience of other states. Proper legal organization of foreign affairs governance should provide for its integration into a single system of public administration, centralization and hierarchical of the system of foreign affairs governance bodies, the system-forming role of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, clear division of powers between it and higher authorities, professional diplomatic service etc.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
I. L. Cherchenko. Constitutional and legal mechanism of foreign relations of Canada. Doctoral dissertation, V.M. Koretsky Institute of State and Law. 2004.
O. H. Makarenko. Constitutional and legal mechanism of foreign relations of Ukraine. Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2009.
M. Dian. Legal issues of the structure and activity of the foreign relations bodies of the Republic of Guinea. Doctoral dissertation, V.M. Koretsky Institute of State and Law. 2001.
S. A. Fedchyshyn. Diplomatic missions of EU member states (administrative and legal aspect). KRYMSKYY YURYDYCHNYY VISNYK 8. 2010. P. 214-215.
S. A. Fedchyshyn. Diplomatic representation of Ukraine abroad in the mechanism of management of foreign affairs. Doctoral dissertation, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. 2011.
T. I. Byrkovych. Legal regulation of the diplomatic service in Ukraine. Doctoral dissertation, Humanities University Zaporizhzhya Institute of State and Municipal Administration. 2007.
V. Tsivatyy & N.-T. Anoshyna. Diplomatic service and diplomats of Great Britain: Historical traditions, modern institutional model (experience for Ukraine). UKRAYINA DYPLOMATYCHNA 12. 2011. P. 495-496.
