Principles of administrative judiciary in Ukraine
Purpose: This article is devoted to scientific and theoretical research of modern system of principles for ad-ministrative procedural law in updated conditions of the Ukrainian state development, based on the needs of qualitative provision and realization of legal rights, freedoms and interests of natural and legal persons, in the sphere of public and legal relations.
Main content: The author analyzed the administrative law regulations, and the doctrine of administrative proce-dural law as for determining nature and significance of the basic principles, which define the nature, structure, social orientation, and basic properties of legal regulation of this branch of law, and which on the other side create appropriate organizational and functional conditions for administrative procedural activities.
Methodology: Materials and methods for research were based on the analysis of documentary sources. The basis is the dialectical method of cognition of the facts of social reality, on which the formal legal and compa-rative legal approaches are largely based.
Conclusions: The principles of administrative procedural law can be divided into those that directly reflect the specifics and content of this branch of law, determine its features, purpose, objectives and intention, as well as administrative procedural principles, i.e., basic principles enshrined in administrative procedural law, which do not undergo significant changes, nor determine the nature and content of the activities of all subjects of administrative procedural legal relations.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 DIXI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Anatoliy Mykolayovych Kolodiy. Principles of law: Genesis, concepts, classification and implementation. ALMANAC OF LAW. 2012.
Angela Alexandrovna Polyanichko. Principles of law: A modern general theoretical view. UNIVERSITY SCIENTIFIC NOTES 47. 2013.
Eduard Demsky. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL LAW OF UKRAINE. Attica. (2008).
Elena Anatoliyivna Zadykhayla. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF UKRAINE (GENERAL PART). Law. (2016).
Mikhail Markovich Dobkin. LOCAL STATE ADMINISTRATIONS: FORMATION, DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONING. Golden Mile. (2012).
Oksana Vladimirovna Kuzmenko. THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. Attica. (2005).
Olga Fyodorovna Skakun. THEORY OF STATE AND LAW (ENCYCLOPEDIC COURSE). Espada. (2005).
Sergiy Antonovych Bondarchuk. PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE OF UKRAINE. Kharkiv National University. (2010).
Valentina Stepanovna Bukina. PRINCIPLES OF SOVIET CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW (THEORETICAL ISSUES OF CONCEPT AND SYSTEM). University A.A. Zhdanov. (1975).
Valery Konstantinovich Matviychuk. SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL COMMENTARY TO THE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE. 2nd edition. Alerta. (2008).
Vasil Yaremenko & Oxana Slipushko. NEW EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE: IN 3 VOLUMES. Aconite. (2007).
Vasil Yaremenko & Oxana Slipushko. NEW EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE: IN 4 VOLUMES. Aconite. (1988).
Vladimir Vladimirovich Lopatina & Lyudmila Evgenievna Lopatina. SMALL EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE. [Unpublished]. (1990).
Yevhen Dorokhina, Yuliia Leheza, Oleksandr Shamara, Serhii Miroshnychenko & Vita Moroz. Citizens’ participation in the fight against criminal offences: Political and legal aspects. CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS 69. 2021. P. 212-224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.12
Yevhen Leheza, Iryna Odyntsova & Natalia Dmytrenko. Teoría y regulación legal del apoyo informativo de los procedimientos administrativos en Ucrania. RATIO JURIS UNAULA 32. 2021. P. 291-306. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24142/raju.v16n32a12
Yevhen Leheza, Maryna Savielieva & Olena Dzhafarova. Structural and legal analysis of scientific activity regulation in developed countries. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES 3. 2018. Pág. 147-157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3-147-157
Yevhen Leheza, Tatiana Filipenko, Olha Sokolenko, Valerii Darahan & Oleksii Kucherenko. Ensuring human rights in Ukraine: Problematic issues and ways of their solution in the social and legal sphere. CUESTIONES POLÍTICAS 64. January-June 2020. P. 123-136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.10
