International and foreign experience of control over the activity of courts (judges)
This article, based on the analysis of scientific views of scholars, summarizes the foreign experience of control over the activity of courts (judges). After summarizing the experience of Germany, it is stated that the legal mechanism of control over judges in this country is characterized not only by the differentiation of the distribution of supervisory powers at the federal and regional levels, but also by the active involvement of executive and legislative bodies. It is established that the existing foreign experience of control and supervision over the work of judges is quite diverse and can be used by domestic legislators when introducing amendments and additions to current legislation. The most positive experience that can be used in Ukraine to improve the control over the activity of judges includes: 1) The need to improve the procedure for selecting judges; 2) extension of the statute of limitations for committing an offense as a ground for disciplinary liability, in order to reduce the risk of judges avoiding its occurrence; 3) introduction of new forms and methods of control in the relevant field; 4) improvement of organizational and legal bases of public involvement in the implementation of control and supervision measures in the area under study.
How to Cite
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Deutscher Bundestag. BASIC LAW FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. (2019). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf/
Hamid Chalid. Dualism of judicial review in Indonesia: Problems and solutions. INDONESIA LAW REVIEW 3. 2017. Pg. 367-394.
Henry Brooke. ENGLISH JUSTICE SYSTEM. LORD SLYNN’S EUROPEAN LAW FOUNDATION. (2014). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https: //slynn-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-English-system-of-justice-Ukrainian-judiciary-seminars-Ukrainian-version.pdf
I. V. Nazarov. The judicial system of Great Britain and its reform in connection with the membership in the European Union. PROBLEMS OF LEGALITY: A COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC WORKS. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. (2011). Pg. 179-187.
M. N. Marchenko. SOURCES OF LAW. Prospekt. (2005).
N. Tuzhely. EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE (ON SPECIALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN GERMANY). (2015). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/evropeyskiy-dosvid.html
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). CONCLUSION OF THE OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS NO. JUD-UKR/298/2017 [RJU/AT] OF 30 JUNE 2017 ON THE LAW OF UKRAINE “ON THE JUDICIARY AND THE STATUS OF JUDGES”. (2020). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/no_3534_en.doc
O. Pavliuk. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION WILL APPLY TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU THROUGH JUDICIAL REFORM IN POLAND. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://hromadske.ua/posts/yevrokomisiya-zvernetsya-do-sudu-yes-z-privodu-sudovoyi-reformi- v-polshi
O. V. Kuzmenko, I. D. Pastukh, O. E. Korystin, et al. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES: A COURSE OF LECTURES. Jurinkom Inter. (2014).
Stanislav V. Shevchuk. JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING: WORLD EXPERIENCE AND PROSPECTS IN UKRAINE. Referat. (2007).
V. V. Koshchinets & J. P. Shvedenko. Some aspects of qualification training of judges (from the experience of foreign countries). BULLETIN OF THE STATE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION OF UKRAINE 4. 2012. Pg. 59-68.
Volker Wagener. HOW ARE GERMAN JUDGES SELECTED: DO THE BEST ALWAYS WIN? (2017). [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://p.dw.com/p/2hJGP/
