Approach to the legal concept of administrative morality
Administrative morality, as an expression of the collective rights enshrined in the Colombian Constitution of 1991, is an innovative constitutional institution in the legal life of this country, it seeks the inspiration of the State in meeting its goals. This paper seeks an approach to the essence of this right in the theoretical sense that has been given to it by both doctrine and jurisprudence. In conclusion we seek here to address the relationship between administrative morality, collective rights and public property.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 14 de abril del 2005. Consejero ponente Germán Rodríguez Villamizar. Radicado 19001-23-31-000-2002-01577-01 A.P.
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 19 de mayo del 2005. Magistrada ponente Ruth Stella Correa Palacio. Radicado 25000-23-24-000-2003-00373-02 A.P.
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 31 de octubre del 2002. Sección Tercera. Consejero ponente Ricardo Hoyos Duque. A.P. No. 2000-1059-01. Esta jurisprudencia fue reiterada por la misma sección en providencia del 5 de octubre del 2005 con ponencia del consejero Ramiro Saavedra Becerra (expediente número AP-01588).
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 5 de agosto del 2004. Consejera ponente María Elena Giraldo Gómez. Expediente AP-0118-01.
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 5 de febrero del 2004. Consejero ponente Ricardo Hoyos Duque. Expediente No. 2500-23-24-000-2002-1964-0-AP.
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. Sentencia del 6 de septiembre del 2001. Consejero ponente Jesús María Carrillo Ballesteros. Expediente No. AP 057.
Eduardo García & Tomás Ramón Fernández. Curso de derecho administrativo. I. Págs. 110-111 y 465. Ed. Civitas. (2004).
Esteban Mora Caicedo & Alfonso Rivera Martínez. Pág. 66. Derecho administrativo y procesal administrativo. Ed. Leyer. (2008).
Geoffrey Hodgson & Jiang Shuxia. La economía de la corrupción y la corrupción de la economía: una perspectiva institucionalista. Revista de Economía Institucional. (2008). At. 55.
Javier Henao Hidrón. Derecho procesal constitucional. Pág. 65. Ed. Temis. (2006).
Juan Ángel Palacio Hincapié. Derecho procesal administrativo. Págs. 379-380. Ed. Librería Jurídica Sánchez. (2005).
Luis Alonso Rico Puerta. Teoría general y práctica de la contratación estatal. Págs. 111-112 y 116. Ed. Leyer. (2009).
Luis Alonso Rico Puerta & Fernando Jaramillo Jaramillo. Bienes. Tomo I. Págs. 175-176. Ed. Leyer. (2001).
Pedro Pablo Camargo. Las acciones populares y de grupo. Pág. 117. Ed. Leyer. (1999).
