The concept of copyright culture
Purpose: this article contains a conceptual elaboration on the copyright culture, for which an approach is made to the concept of copyright, as well as the dimensions and theories that support it, in order to determine what a work is and its corresponding rights.
Description: the research is an approximation to the concept of political culture that has favored an explanation for the values, feelings and beliefs of people’s political behavior.
Point of view: the author uses his experience in the field of law, political studies, arts and their teaching, to make a novel proposal.
Conclusions: the above concepts are structural inputs of the author’s proposal on the need to elaborate the concept of copyright culture, in order to promote research that shows the importance of people’s values, feelings and awareness with respect to copyright, and thus impact public policies in this legal field.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
A.G. Resolución 217 A (III). Artículo 27, numeral 2. (Diciembre 10 de 1948).
Alfredo Vega. MANUAL DE DERECHO DE AUTOR. Dirección Nacional de Derecho de Autor, Unidad Administrativa Especial, Ministerio del Interior y de Justicia. (2010).
Arcadia. Censura artística en el Museo Santa Clara. REVISTAARCADIA.COM. Agosto 19 del 2014. Disponible en http://www.revistaarcadia.com/arte/articulo/censura-artistica-en-el-museo-santa-clara/38432
Carlos Mouchet y Sigfrido Radaelli. LOS DERECHOS DEL ESCRITOR Y DEL ARTISTA. Sudamericana. (1957).
Carlos R. Asúnsolo-Morales. Los derechos humanos como límites al poder público y privado: otra vía de fundamentación. REVISTA DIXI 22. DICIEMBRE 2015.
Delia Lipszic. DERECHO DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS. UNESCO-CERLALC. (1993).
Fernando Charria García. DERECHOS DE AUTOR EN COLOMBIA. Editorial Instituto Departamental de Bellas Artes. (2001).
Gabriel Almond. El estudio de la cultura política. REVISTA DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA 10(2). Pág. 77-89. Disponible en https://repositorio.uc.cl/bitstream/handle/11534/10833/000129200.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Giacomo Sani. Cultura Política. DICCIONARIO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA.
Isidro Satanowsky. DERECHO INTELECTUAL. TEA. (1954).
Jhonny Antonio Pabón Cadavid (2009). Aproximación a la historia del derecho de autor: antecedentes normativos. REVISTA LA PROPIEDAD INMATERIAL 13. Págs. 55-104.
Ley del Estado de Massachusetts de 1789. Marzo 17 de 1789.
Ulrich Uchtenhagen. Introducción. HISTORIA DEL DERECHO DE AUTOR Y LOS DERECHOS CONEXOS. CURSO REGIONAL DE LA OMPI SOBRE DERECHO DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS PARA PAÍSES DE AMÉRICA LATINA. (1997). Pág. 8.
Yolanda Reyes. LOS OFICIOS DE LA IMAGINACIÓN. Dirección Nacional de Derecho de Autor. (2005) Pág. 26.
