Order for payment procedure
What to do when the defendant cannot be personally served?
Theme and scope: the order for payment procedure has been one of the legal institutions that has generated the most comments and raised concerns in the Colombian legal community since it was proposed as an institution to be incorporated into the General Code of Procedure. This procedural institution dates back to the Middle Ages and has been historically introduced in different procedural systems.
Characteristics: some of the characteristics identified are speed, the possibility of a final judgment, and its strictly pecuniary nature.
Findings: however, the incorporation of this legal institution entails the problem of its disuse, because, when the defendant cannot be served, the legal option that the plaintiff has is to withdraw the claim and initiate another type of legal action.
Conclusions: the purpose of this article is to prove that the limitations imposed on the form of summons in the order for payment procedure lead to the denial of justice while the citizen ends up not using the order for payment procedure, but traditional methods in order to obtain a writ of execution.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Amalia Tapias Tapias, Rafael Evelio Muñoz Sánchez y Lili Medina Ortiz. Algunas Vicisitudes del Proceso Monitorio en Colombia-Una Visión Desde la Academia. DIXI 18(24). 2016. Pág. 0-21. Pág. 51.
Ángel Landoni Sosa. Luces y Sombras den la Reforma del Código General del Proceso Uruguayo. La Ley 1909 Vigente del 14 de Agosto de 2013. XXXV CONGRESO COLOMBIANO DE DERECHO PROCESAL. (2014). Pág.
Antonio Segni. El procedimiento intimatorio en Italia. REVISTA DE DERECHO PRIVADO168. 1927. Págs. 307-318.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. SENTENCIA C-726/2014. (MP Martha Sáchica; septiembre 21 del 2014).
Eduardo J. Couture. Los otros procesos monitorios en el Código General del Proceso Uruguayo. XXXV CONGRESO COLOMBIANO DE DERECHO PROCESAL. (2014).
Felipe Varcalcel Prieto. EL PROCESO MONITORIO. Disponible en http://dspace.sheol.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/10651/28743/3/TFMValcarcel%20Prieto,%20Felipe.pdf
Gustavo Calvinho. DEBIDO PROCESO Y PROCEDIMIENTO MONITORIO. Disponible en http://www.petruzzosc.com.ar/articulos_y_publicaciones/Debido_Proceso_y_procedimiento_monitorio.pdf
Joan Picó I. Junoy. EL PROCESO MONITORIO UNA VISIÓN EUROPEA Y ESPAÑOLA DE LA TUTELA RÁPIDA DEL CRÉDITO. Disponible en http://www.icdp.org.co/revista/articulos/37/JoanPicoIJunoy.pdf
José Alejandro Gómez Orozco. INTRODUCCIÓN AL PROCESO MONITORIO COLOMBIANO: CONSTITUCIONALIDAD Y ORALIDAD DEL DERECHO CIVIL. Librería Jurídica Sánchez R. Ltda. (2014).
Ley 1/2000. De enjuiciamiento civil de enero 7 del 2000. (Enero 8 del 2000). BOE 7 (Esp.).
Ley 1564 de 2012. Por medio de la cual se expide el Código General del Proceso y se dictan otras disposiciones. (Julio 12, 2012). DO 48.489.
Ley 15.982/1988. (Octubre 18 de 1988). DO 22.743 (Uruguay).
Ley 19.090/2013. (Junio 14 de 2013). DO 28.743 (Uruguay).
Piero Calamandrei. EL PROCEDIMIENTO MONITORIO. Librería El Foro. (2007).
Real Academia Española. Diccionario. REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA. Disponible en http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=monitorio
Reglamento (CE) N.o 1896/2006 [Parlameto Europeo y del Consejo]. Por el que se establece un proceso monitorio europeo. Diciembre 12 del 2006.
Santiago Pereira Campos. Los Proceso Civiles por Audiencias en Uruguay. 20 Años de aplicación exitosa del Código Procesal Civil Modelo para Iberoamérica. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS SOBRE DERECHO PROCESAL Y ARBITRAJE 2. 2009.
Ulises Canosa Suárez. CÓDIGO GENERAL DEL PROCESO. Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal. (2012).
Ximena Andrea Lanos Torres y Claudia Patricia Torres Montaño. LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DEL PROCESO MONITORIO EN EL ORDENAMIENTO PROCESAL CIVIL COLOMBIANO. Disponible en http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/10900/1/LanosTorresXimenaAndrea2014.pdf.
