Extraordinary resources against arbitration decisions in Colombia
This paper is the first product of a research project that has as its broader goal to study “The scope and effect of arbitration proceedings since the Constitution of 1991 from jurisprudence and doctrine”. To achieve this goal we have to develop three specific objectives: to know the definition of arbitration and the scope of its competence; to know the grounds for annulment of arbitration decisions; and finally, to present and understand how affirmative action can proceed, opposing the arbiter decision when there are mistakes that he may have made when issuing it.
How to Cite
License
Every single author of the articles has to declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by them, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in the contract.
In this sense, the authors committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal DIXI before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, the authors committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, the authors have to declare that they are completely in agreement with the conditions presented in their work and that they cede all patrimonial rights. These rights involve reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Christian Bühring-Uhle. Arbitration and Mediation in International Business. Kluwer Law International. Págs. 42-44. (1996).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-576 de 1993 (M.P. Jorge Arango Mejía).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-442 de 1994 (M.P. Antonio Barrera Carbonell).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-538 de 1994 (M.P. Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-231 de 1994 (M.P. Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-294 de 1995 (M.P. Jorge Arango Mejía).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-239 de 1996 (M.P. José Gregorio Hernández Galindo).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-163 de 1999 (M.P. Alejandro Martínez Caballero).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia SU-047 de 1999 (M.P. Carlos Gaviria Díaz y Alejandro Martínez Caballero).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia SU-014 del 2001 (M.P. Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia SU-1185 del 2001 (M.P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-1228 del 2003 (M.P. Álvaro Tafur Galvis).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia SU-174 del 2007 (M.P. Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa).
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-790 de 2010 (M.P. Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Civil. 13 de agosto de 1998.
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Civil. 4 de septiembre del 2000.
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Civil. Sentencia 22 de abril de 1992.
Dante Barrios de Ángelis. El juicio arbitral. Cap. II. Núm. 7. (1956).
Pedro Pablo Cardona Galeano. Manual de Derecho Procesal Civil. Tomo, 1. Pág. 119. Leyer. (2003).
Roque Caivano. Arbitraje. Págs. 98-99. Villela Editor. (2000).
