O crowdfunding para projetos social : instrumento financeiro um elemento de coesão social e gerador de bem-estar
Doctora en Economia Social, Master en Coach Profesional Ejecutivo
email: antonia.sajardo@uv.es
Profesora Titular de Universidad, Departamento de Economia Aplicada
email: voroperez@gmail.com
O objetivo deste artigo é aprofundar o estudo do financiamento coletivo e o papel que ele desempenha no
campo de entidades e projetos sociais, a partir de uma perspectiva tripla. Primeiro, valorizando seu papel como instrumento de captação de recursos que gera independência financeira e avança em sua autonomia políticosocial. Segundo, como elemento coeso da sociedade e expansão da democracia participativa. Terceiro, na obtenção de melhorias no bem-estar social - movimentos superiores de Pareto -. A metodologia de trabalho foi a análise de Big Data das plataformas representativas do financiamento coletivo social no Estado espanhol, migranodearena.org e goteo.org, na modalidade de doação e recompensa, respectivamente, desde a sua criação até dezembro de 2016.
Ahlers, G.K.C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., and Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 955–980.
Allison, T.H., Davis, B., Short, J.C., and Webb, J.W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 53–73.
Allison, T.H., McKenny, A.F., and Short, J.C. (2013). The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: An examination of the warm–glow effect. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 690–707.
Almerico, K. (2015). SEC: Startups can now raise $50 million in “mini IPO.” Entrepreneur. Available from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/244278
Archambautl,E. (1986). L'economie sociale est-elle associée aux grandes fonctions économiques des pouvoirs publics. Revue des Etudes Coopératives, Mutualistes et Associatives, 18, 23-43.
Batliwala, S. (2002): Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors: Implications for Global Civil Society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13, (4), pp 393-409.
Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision making. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 23-34
Barr, N. (2004). Economics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press. Belleflamme, P. et al. (2013). Individual Crowdfunding Practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313-333.
Bernard, P. (1999). Social Cohesion: A Dialectical Critique of a Quasi-Concept?, Ottawa: Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian Heritage.
Brestschneider, U. et al. (2017): Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers’ motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 246-260.
Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D., and Wright, M. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer–to–peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 9–26.
Butticè, V., Colombo, M., and Wright, M. (2017). Serial crowdfunding, social capital, and project success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 183–207
Calic, G. and Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 738–767.
Colombo, M.G., Franzoni, C., and Rossi–Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 75–100.
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., and Li, Y. (2016). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 265–290.
Cholakova, M. and Clarysse, B. (2015). Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward–based investments? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 145–172.
De la Fuente, S. (2011). Análisis factorial. Recuperado de http://www. fuenterrebollo. com/Economicas/ECONOMETRIA/MULTIVARIANTE/FACTORIAL/analisis-factorial. pdf.
Drover, W., Wood, M.S., and Zacharakis, A. (2015). Attributes of angel and crowdfunded investments as determinants of VC screening decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73.
Forrest, R. and Kearns A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125-2143.
Gerber, E.M. et al. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfundign platforms. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c1e2/a1068f0af1c3120c62be5943340518860ecb.pdf
Hui, J., Greenberg, M. and Gerber, E, (2014): Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proceedings of the17th ACM Conference on Computer supported cooperative work and social computing.
Galaz, C., y Prieto, R. (2006). Economía solidaria: de la obsesión por el lucro a la redistribución con equidad (Vol. 62). Icaria Editorial.
Gidron, B. , Kramer, R. andSalamon, L. (1992) (Eds). Government and the Third Sector. Emerging and Relationships in Welfare States. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Giudici, G., Guerini, M. and Rossi Lamastra, C. (2013). Why Crowdfunding Projects Can Succeed: The Role of Proponents’ Individual and Territorial Social Capital (April 24, 2013). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2255944 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255944
Josefy, M., Dean, T.J., Albert, L.S., and Fitza, M.A. (2016). The role of community in crowdfunding success: Evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “save the local theater.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 161–182.
Kuppuswamy, V. and Bayus, B.L. (2017). Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 72–89.
Leadbeater Ch. (2008). We Think. Mass Innovation not Mass Production. London: Profile Books LTD. Profile Books Limited.
Lin, M. and Viswanathan, S. (2015). Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science, 62, 1393–1414.
Lévy, P. (1997): Collective Intelligence: Mankind´s Emerging World in Cyberspace. New York: Plenum.
PETS (2015). El Tercer Sector de Acción social en 2015: Impacto de la crisis. Madrid: Plataforma del Tercer Sector de Acción Social.
Mosseyev A. (2013). Effect of Social Media on Crowdfunding Project Results. University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
Nten, Comon Knowledge and Blackbaud (2012). Nonprofit Social Network Benchmark Report. Retrieved from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120403006434/en/Nonprofit-Investment-Social-Networks-Membership-Continue-Grow
Parra, C. (2015). La sostenibilidad del Tercer Sector a través de las herramientas de la emprendeduría social, Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 15, 121-146.
Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: social capital and public life.
The American Prospect, 13.
PwC et al. (2014). Estudio sobre el presente y futuro del Tercer Sector Social en
un entorno de crisis. Fundacion La Caixa, Instituto de Innovacion Social de
ESADE , Fundacion de PwC. Recuperado de
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043ycontext=businessdiss
Rodríguez Cabrero, G. y Marbán, V. (2013). Análisis prospectivo sobre los retos actuales y futuros del Tercer Sector de Acción Social Parte II: Los retos del Tercer Sector de Acción Social. Recuperado de http://www.plataformaong.org/ciudadaniaactiva/tercersector/analisis_prospectivo_retos_del_TSAS_parte_2.pdf
Rodríguez Cabrero, G. y Marbán, V. (2015). Sistemas mixtos de protección social. El tercer sector en la producción de bienestar. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 71, 61-82.
Rodríguez de las Heras, T. (2015). El crowdfunding: una forma de financiación colectiva, colaborativa y participativa de proyectos, Pensar en Derecho, 3, 101-123.
Sáez,S. (2015). El crowdfunding no lucrativo como instrumento alternativo de financiación en la Economía Social. Revista Jurídica de Economía Social y Cooperativa, 26, 303-340.
Sajardo, A. (2012). Análisis económico del Sector No lucrativo. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
Sajardo, A. y Pérez, S. (2015). Towards the mobilization of social margins: nonprofit sector and information communication technology. 5th CIRIEC International Research Conference on Social Economy. Lisbon.
Sajardo, A. y Pérez,S. (2018). Herramientas de Economía Colaborativa en la implementación de la RBU: el potencial del BlockChain. Congreso Internacional de Economia Colaborativa, Economía Social y Bienestar. Valencia.
Sanz, R.J. y Lucas, M. (2015), Implicaciones tributarias del crowdfunding o financiación colectiva, Quincena Fiscal, 9, 19-69.
Skirnevskiy, V., Bendig, D., and Brettel, M. (2017). The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 209–236
Short, J., Ketche, D., McKenny, A., Allison, Th., and Ireland, D. (2017). How Should Crowdfunding Research Evolve? A Survey. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 149-160.
Soto, Mª. M. (2018). Tributación del crowdfunding. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Tapscott, D. and Williams A.D. (2010). Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and The World Portfolio. London: The Penguin Group.
Vranken, J. (2001). No Social Cohesion without Social Exclusion? Research Unit on Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City. University of Antwerp. Retrieved from
http://www.shakti.uniurb.it/eurex/syllabus/lecture4/Eurex4-Vranken.pdf.
Weisbrod, B. (1975). Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy. En S. Phelps. (1975). Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory. New York: Rusell Sage Foundation.
Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector. Lexington Books Lexington, M.A..
Weisbrod, B.A. (1988). The Nonprofit Economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Weisbrod, B.A. (2001). The future of the nonprofit sector: its entwining with private enterprise and government. Steven Ott.
Wolch. V. (1990). Government and Voluntary Sector en Transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
World Bank (2012): Crowdfunding's Potential for the Developing World. World Bank.
Copyright (c) 2020 Cooperativismo & Desarrollo

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O autor deve declarar que seu trabalho é original e inédito e que não foi enviado à avaliação simultânea para sua publicação por outro meio. Além disso, deve garantir que não tem impedimentos de nenhuma natureza para a concessão dos direitos previstos no contrato.
O autor se compromete a esperar o parecer da revista Cooperativismo & Desarrollo antes de considerar sua apresentação a outro meio; caso a resposta de publicação seja positiva, compromete-se em responder por qualquer ação de reivindicação, plágio ou outro tipo de reclamação que possa ocorrer por parte de terceiros.
Ainda, deve declarar que, como autor ou coautor, está completamente de acordo com os conteúdos apresentados no trabalho e ceder todos os direitos patrimoniais, isto é, sua reprodução, comunicação pública, distribuição, divulgação, transformação e demais formas de utilização da obra por qualquer meio ou procedimento, pelo termo de sua proteção legal e em todos os países do mundo, ao Fundo Editorial da Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, de maneira gratuita e sem compensação monetária.