Propuesta para conducir la reflexión fenomenológica en el emprendimiento social

Juan Morúa Ramírez; David Steven Agudelo Gutiérrez; Sergio Méndez Valencia

doi:10.16925/2382-4220.2022.01.04

A phenomenological approach to social entrepreneurship

Reasearch Article

https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-4220.2022.01.04

Juan Morúa Ver Biografía

Universidad de Guanajuato

David Steven Agudelo Gutiérrez Ver Biografía

Independiente

Sergio Méndez Ver Biografía

Universidad de Guanajuato

Social entrepreneurship allows different actors to interact in joint actions which allow improving the living conditions of society; in this interaction reflexive processes guided by dialogue arise; Thus, the purpose of this study is to offer a phenomenological proposal to be carried out within action intervention processes supported by systems theory with a constructivist and cognitivist vision. The method was based on the bibliographic review of the key concepts (social entrepreneurship and systems theory), to then study the case of a qualitative study with an ethnographic approach carried out with an ecotourism social enterprise. As a relevant result, the need to help social enterprises through action intervention processes is proposed, guided theoretically through the phenomena derived from systems theory, which allow them to understand and act in a way that is more in line with their nature as a project. Social.

Keywords: systems theory, social entrepreneurship, phenomenology

Agudelo, D. (2019). La emergencia de la empresa social, el caso de la empresa rural social ecoturística en el municipio de Atarjea, el Carricillo, Guanajuato.

Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12(1), 1-124.

Álvarez-Gayou, J. L. (2003). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa: Fundamentos y metodología. México, DF, México: Paidós.

Austin, J., Stevenson, H. y Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30 (1), 1-22.

Barbera, N., & Inciarte, A. (2012). Fenomenología y hermenéutica: dos perspectivas para estudiar las ciencias sociales y humanas. Multiciencias Vol.12 No. 2, 199-205.

Barkin, D., & Warnholtz, G. (2015). Ecoturismo: una quimera para comunidades rurales en áreas naturales protegidas. Otra Economía, 9(17), 199-209.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2001). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrurtu.

Boisot, M., & McKelvey, B. (2011). Complexity and organization-Environment. Relations: Revisiting Ashby's law of requisite variety. In P. Allen, S. Maguire, & B. McKelvey, Complexity and Management (pp. 279-298). London: Sage.

Caines, K. E. (2010). Ethnography. Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications]. Recuperado de. Recuperado de http://www.sageereference.com/researchdesign/Article_n135.html

Campbell, S. (1998). « Social entrepreneurship: how to develop new social-purpose business ventures. », Health care strategic management.

Catford, J. (1998). Social Entrepreneurs are Vital for Health Promotion- But They Need Supportive Environments Too. Health Promotion International, 13(2), 95-97.

Dearlove, D. (2004). Interview: Jeff Skoll. Business Strategy Review, 15(2), 51-53.

Dees, G., y Anderson, B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on social entrepreneurship,

Dees, J. G. (1994). Social Enterprise: Private Initiatives for the Common Good. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

Defourny, J., y Nyssens, M. (2012). El enfoque EMES de la empresa social desde una perspectiva comparada. CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa ISSN.

Díaz, J. (2007). De la mente al conocimiento mediante la ciencia cognitiva. Ciencias, No. 88, 4 -17.

Espínola Verdín, V., y Torres González, L. (2020) Análisis cualitativo de modelos de negocio para el emprendimiento social. Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, 8(22).

Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step (3a. Ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA, EE. UU: SAGE.

Guevara, S. (2010). Las reservas de biosfera en Iberoamérica. Ambienta, 92, 46-56.

Guzmán, A., y Trujillo, M. (2008). Emprendimiento social–revisión de literatura. Estudios Gerenciales, 24(109), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(08)70055-X

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.). México, D.F., México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Husserl, E. (2008). La crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental. Buenos Aires : Prometeo Libros.

Le Moigne, J.-L. (1999). La modélisation des systèmes complexes. Paris : Dunod.

Le Moigne, J.-L. (2012). Les épistémologies constructivistes. Paris : Presses universitaires de france.

Mair, J., y Marti, I. (2006). « Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight ». Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

Martin, R. y Osberg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford social innovation review, 5(1), 28-39. ARNOVA occasional paper series (Vol. 1).

Martínez, D., Álvarez, N., y Antolín, M. (2014). Emprendimiento social vs innovación social. Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, 24(1), 119-140.

McLeod, J., & Thomson, R. (2009). Researching social change: Qualitative approaches. Londres, UK: SAGE.

Morgan, G. (1999). Images de l'organisation. Québec : De Boeck université.

Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris : Éditions du seuil.

Morua, J. (2013). Pour une conception stratégique de la valeur des produits et services, une approche dynamique en PME. Nancy : Thèse en sciences de la gestion, Université de lorraine.

Morua, J. (2017). El emprendedor, su proyecto y sus limitantes desde un enfoque dinámico y cognitivo: reflexiones de una intervención en campo. Proyectics, proyectica, proyectique 2017/No. 16, 51-6.

Morua, J., Flores, A., & Bojórquez, A. (2019). Los retos de la Universidad frente al emprendimiento social: reflexiones obtenidas de una intervención-acción. Projectics / Proyéctica / Projectique 2019 /2 No 23, 79-98.

Mucchielli, A. (2006). Deux modèles constructivistes pour le diagnostic des communication organisationnelles. Communication et organisation No. 30, 1-28.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283.

Rivera, I., & Morua, J. (2013). Reconstruyendo el aumento de efectivo: bases para una metodología de mejora continua. Arbor, vol. 189 No. 760.

Roberts, D. y Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: The concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 7 (1), 45-51.

Roberts, D., y Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: The concept of social

Rockmore, T. (2007). Hegel et el constructivisme épistémologique. Revue de métaphysique et de morale No. 53 - 1, 103-113.

Schmitt, C. (2015). L'agir entrepreneurial. Québec : Presses de l'Université du Québec.

Seelos, C., y Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business horizons, 48(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006

Seelos, C., y Mair, J. (2017). Innovation and scaling for impact: How effective social enterprises do it. California: Stanford Business Books.

Uzeta, J. (2011). Memorias del margen serrano Atarjea, Guanajuato, 1871-2008 (pp. 1871–2008). Zamora, Michoacán: El colegio de Michoacán.

Vásquez, A. G., y Dávila, M. A. T. (2008). Emprendimiento social–revisión de literatura. Estudios gerenciales, 105-126.

Weerawardena, J., y Mort, G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001

Morúa, J., Agudelo Gutiérrez, D. S., & Méndez Valencia, S. (2022). A phenomenological approach to social entrepreneurship. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 30(122), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-4220.2022.01.04

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

As the author of the article declares that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.

In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Cooperativismo & Desarrollo before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 122 (2022)

Published

03/10/2022

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/2382-4220.2022.01.04