Ecologies of intermediation and the Social and Solidarity Economy
A new form of governance for ecological transitions
This article argues that ecological transitions are increasingly shaped by overlapping intermediaries and that Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) principles can make these “ecologies of intermediation” more effective and fair. Using an exploratory integrative literature review of core work on intermediation ecologies and 13 studies linking SSE to eco-social transitions, the authors identify coordination problems and SSE-based responses. They show how intercooperation, democratic network governance, territorial embeddedness and mission-oriented ethical finance can transform competition for resources into complementarity, distribute sensing and decision-making across scales, and sustain long-term transition work beyond short project cycles. From this analysis, the article develops a conceptual framework and testable propositions and proposes policy guidance that recognizes SSE networks as ecology-level stewards, designs hybrid arenas where public, regime and community intermediaries co-decide, builds capabilities for value-based cooperation and revises evaluation systems to capture relational and value outcomes.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cooperativismo & Desarrollo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As the author of the article declares that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Cooperativismo & Desarrollo before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Abad, J. S. (2025). Aportaciones de la economía social y solidaria a la transición ecosocial a partir de la gestión de la basura: Apuntes desde la experiencia de Traperos de Emaús Navarra. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo / Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 158–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10699
Arando-Lasagabaster, S., & Herce-Lezeta, B. (2023). Country study on drivers and barriers for employee ownership: The case of MONDRAGON Group. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(2), 166–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-10-2022-0024
Arcos-Alonso, A., Fernández de la Cuadra-Liesa, I., García-Azpuru, A., & Barba del Horno, M. (2024). Rethinking economics education: Student perceptions of the social and solidarity economy in higher education. Education Sciences, 15(1), 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010027
Bager, T. (1994). Isomorphic processes and the transformation of cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 65(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.1994.tb01505.x
Barba del Horno, M. (2025). Hacia un poscapitalismo digital: Aportaciones desde la economía social y solidaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo / Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 134–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10647
Bastås, L., & Mignon, I. (2025). Comparing public and private intermediaries co-existing in ecologies of intermediation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 56, 100972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100972
Bulkeley, H., Schroeder, H., Janda, K., Zhao, J., Armstrong, A., Chu, S. Y., & Ghosh, S. (2011). The role of institutions, governance, and urban planning for mitigation and adaptation. En Cities and climate change: Responding to an urgent agenda (pp. 125–159). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821384930_CH05
Carranza-Barona, C., Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Hurtado, G., & Villavicencio-Salazar, N. (2025). Experiencias de transición ecosocial en Ecuador desde la economía social solidaria y la agroecología. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo / Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 54–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10636
Coraggio, J. L. (2011). Economía social y solidaria: El trabajo antes que el capital. Editorial Abya-Yala.
Díaz, R. G. A., Roldán, F. R., & Sánchez, R. M. (2024). Finanzas éticas y solidarias: Herramientas para una transición socioecológica justa. El caso de Fiare Banca Ética. Revista de Economía Mundial, (67), 221–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.vi67.8221
Ehnert, F. (2023). Review of research into urban experimentation in the fields of sustainability transitions and environmental governance. European Planning Studies, 31(1), 76–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2070424
Etxezarreta, E., Pérez de Mendiguren, J. C., & Morandeira, J. (2009). Sobre el concepto de economía social y su proceso de consolidación. En I. Bretos & J. M. Pérez de Uralde (Eds.), Economía social vasca y crisis económica (pp. 11–17).
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012). Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 991–998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
Fischer, L. B., & Newig, J. (2016). Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8(5), 476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Geels, F. W. (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009
Geels, F. W., & Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778984
Hernberg, H., & Hyysalo, S. (2024). Modes of intermediation: How intermediaries engage in advancing local bottom-up experimentation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 51, 100849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100849
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
Hyysalo, S., Juntunen, J. K., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries. Research Policy, 47(5), 872–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.012
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC.
Itçaina, X., & Kieffer, M. (2025). De la comunidad a la cooperativa y viceversa: ¿Continuidades, rupturas o transiciones en proyectos de turismo de base comunitario en México? Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo / Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 210–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10649
Kanda, W., Kuisma, M., Kivimaa, P., & Hjelm, O. (2020). Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 449–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.002
Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
Laville, J.-L. (2010). Associationnisme: Le bien commun aux confins du marché et de l’État. Finance & Bien Commun, 37–38(2), 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/fbc.037.0064
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Mignon, I., & Kanda, W. (2018). A typology of intermediary organizations and their impact on sustainability transition policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 100–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.001
Monzón, J. L., & Chaves, R. (2011). The social economy: An international perspective. Introduction. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (73), 4–8.
Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279794
Olaizola-Alberdi, J., Imaz-Alias, O., Bollain, J., & Herce-Leceta, B. (2025). Redefining the model: Cooperatives in the just ecosocial transition paradigm. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo / Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 80–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10576
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
Pérez de Mendiguren, J. C., & Etxezarreta, E. (2015). Sobre el concepto de economía social y solidaria: Aproximaciones desde Europa y América Latina. Revista de Economía Mundial, (40), 123–143.
Ramos-Mejía, M., Franco-García, M. L., & Jauregui-Becker, J. M. (2018). Sustainability transitions in the developing world: Challenges of socio-technical transformations unfolding in contexts of poverty. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 217–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.010
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. En S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (Vol. II, pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
Santos, M. R., & Moreira, S. B. (2025). Gaining insight into the EU’s social and solidarity economy role via strategic policy documents analysis. Social Inclusion, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10064
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2013). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. En The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys (pp. 17–34).
Soberón, M., Sánchez-Chaparro, T., Smith, A., Moreno-Serna, J., Oquendo-Di Cosola, V., & Mataix, C. (2022). Exploring the possibilities for deliberately cultivating more effective ecologies of intermediation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 125–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.06.003
Soto-Gorrotxategi, A., Etxezarreta-Etxarri, E., & Villalba-Eguiluz, U. (2025). Economía social y solidaria y crisis ecosocial: La intercooperación como vía para avanzar en las transiciones. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo, 14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10704
Villalba Eguiluz, U. (2024). La economía circular y las economías transformadoras: Alcances y tensiones en el País Vasco. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (112). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.112.28299
Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Sahakian, M., González-Jamett, C., & Etxezarreta, E. (2023). Social and solidarity economy insights for the circular economy: Limited-profit and sufficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138050




