A comparative study between the Brazilian cooperativism and world reference countries
Cooperativism emerged in the nineteenth century, in England, as a response to the deleterious consequences of the accelerated development of industrial capitalism. It was founded to resist the hegemony of big business, which already demonstrated its contradictions and strong exploitation of the working class. Cooperativism, a term interchangeable with the expression cooperative movement, can be understood as a socio-productive system based on cooperative organizations, but not limited to them, as it goes beyond the productive universe and incorporates a set of societal values, as participation and mutual responsibility. Given its organizational plurality and geographic scope, this study aims to analyze the Brazilian cooperative model in comparison to the models: New Zealand, French, Finnish and Italian, seeking to bring out similarities and differences, barriers and potential for the development of Brazilian cooperativism. The selection of these countries is due to the fact that they are among the main highlights in the Cooperative Economy Index according to the UN. It is a qualitative and descriptive research, fundamentally based on journals, scientific studies and relevant international research on the subject. As a result of the research, it was found that Brazilian cooperativism still presents timid indicators in relation to reference countries in the area, which points to a vast field to be developed. On the other hand, with regard to the movement's structure, the country follows the best global practices, with a body responsible for representing and bringing together the movement's interests, which creates greater unity and strength for the movement. It is also in tune with reference countries in terms of principles and values, notably solidarity, responsibility, democracy and equality.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cooperativismo & Desarrollo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As the author of the article declares that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Cooperativismo & Desarrollo before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bijaoui, I. (2017). SMEs in an era of globalization: international business and market strategies. Springer Nature.
Conseil National des Chambres Régionales de L’économie Sociale (2015). Panorama de l’économie sociale et solidaire em France. I.C.O. Imprimerie.
COOP FR (2020a). Coop FR, co-operative enterprises. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from https://www.entreprises.coop/english-version.html
COOP FR (2020b). Créer une coopérative. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://www.entreprises.coop/pourquoi-une-coop/92-creer-une-cooperative.html
Cracogna, D., Fici, A., & Henrÿ, H. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of cooperative law. Springer-Verlag.
Dave Grace and Associates (2014). Measuring the size and scope of the cooperative economy: results of the 2014 global census on co-operatives. For the United Nation’s Secretariat. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/2014/coopsegm/grace.pdf
França (1947). Loi n° 47-1775 du 10 septembre 1947. Portant statut de la coopération. Paris, 1947. Retrieved February 21, 2020, from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000684004.
Fonterra, A. (2017). Fonterra Co-operative Group. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from https://www.fonterra.com/br/pt.html.
Garnevska, E., Callagher, L., Apparao, M. D., Shadbolt, N., & Siedlok, F. (2017). The New Zealand co-operative economy. Massey University.
Godoy, A. S. (1995, março/abril). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 35, 2, 57-63.
Hunt, E. K., Sherman, H. J. (2013). História do pensamento econômico. 26. ed. Vozes.
International Cooperative Alliance. (2015). Notas de orientación para los principios cooperativos. Retrieved April 21, 2021, from https://www.ica.coop/sites/default/files/publication-files/guidance-notes-es-2107251738.pdf.
Itália (1942). Regio Decreto 16 marzo 1942, n. 262. Approvazione del test del Codice civile. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:regio.decreto:1942-03-16;262!vig=
Klaes, L. S. (2005). Cooperativismo e ensino a distância. (Tese de doutorado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina). Repositório da UFSC. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/103034/213746.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Legacoop (2010). I valori cooperativi. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from http://www.legacooplazio.it/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Valori-cooperativi.pdf.
Leopoldino, C. J. (2020). O cooperativismo e a função social constitucional da cooperação nas constituições da Itália e do Brasil. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 28(118), 1-25.
Levi, Y., & Davis, P. (2008). Cooperatives as the “enfants terrible” of economics: some implications for the social economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37, 2178-2188.
López, Belmonte, J., Moreno Guerrero, A. J. y Fuentes Cabrera, A.. (2020). Las cooperativas de enseñanza en España: Un modelo educativo para el desarrollo profesional docente basado en la economía social. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 28(2),1-25.
Luzio-dos-Santos, L. M. (2014). Socioeconomia: solidariedade, economia social e as organizações em debate. Atlas.
Luzio-dos-Santos, L. M. (2015). Pautas para outra sociabilidade. Eduel.
Marra, A. V. (2009). Associativismo e Cooperativismo. Fundação CECIERJ.
Mendes, M. M. (2010). Relação entre educação cooperativista, participação e satisfação dos cooperados: verdades incertas. (Dissertação de mestrado em Administração de Organizações, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo).
Menezes, A. (2018). Os dois pinheirinhos continuam firmes? Confebras.
Michels, V. (2000). Uma contribuição à análise dos princípios de administração financeira aplicados a sociedades cooperativas de produção agrícola (Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo). Repositório da USP. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/001109292
Namorado, R. (2013). O mistério do cooperativismo: da cooperação ao movimento cooperativo. Edições Almedina S.A.
Organização das Cooperativas Brasileiras. (2010). Apresentação Institucional Sistema Cooperativo Brasileiro. Retrieved March 02, 2022, from https://www.yumpu.com/pt/document/read/32001126/apresentacao-institucional-sistema-cooperativista-brasileiro-ocb.
Pellervo (2018) Osuustoimintakeskus Pellervo ry: n säännöt. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from https://pellervo.fi/osuustoimintakeskus-pellervo/toiminta/osuustoimintakeskus-pellervo-saannot
Pellervo (2020). Usein kysyttyä osuustoiminnasta, Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://pellervopel.fi/faq-items/mita-ovat-osuustoiminnan-arvot-ja-periaatteet/
Rocha, J. C. M. (2021). Estruturas e vivências organizacionais nos diferentes modelos cooperativos brasileiros: um estudo a partir de experiências paranaenses. (Dissertação de mestrado em Administração, Universidade Estadual de Londrina).
Salatino, A. C. C. S. (2017). El progreso agrícola: uma cooperativa no Pampa Bonaerense. Cadernos UniFOA, 35, 49-61.
Santos, B. S., Rodríguez, C. (2002). Produzir para viver: os caminhos da produção não capitalista. Editora Civilização Brasileira.
Schneider, J. O. (2012). Quatro funções básicas das cooperativas. Sua atualidade. Revista Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 20(101), 79-90.
Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem do Cooperativismo (2017). Disseminação de práticas, o modelo cooperativista pdgc. Retrieved February 18, 2020, from http://www.fnq.org.br/PAINEL_B__apresentacao_SESCOOP1.pdf
Silva, A. C. P. (2002). Cooperativismo e Autonomia: pela transformação das práticas e dos objetivos associativistas no espaço rural brasileiro. Geo UERJ Revista do Departamento de Geografia, 12, 33-45.
Singer, P. (2002). Introdução à economia solidária. Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Siqueira, K. B., Barros, R. C., Melor, N. R., & Gama, D. A. (2012). Competividade do leite em pó integral brasileiro. Revista de Política Agrícola, 21(193).
Sistema OCB. (2020). O que é cooperativismo. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from https://somoscooperativismo.coop.br/o-que-e-cooperativismo
Sistema OCB. (2019). Anuário do cooperativismo brasileiro 2019. Retrieved January 10, 2021, from http://www.paranacooperativo.coop.br/ppc/images/Comunicacao/2019/noticias/07/04/publicacao/publicacao_clique_aqui_04_07_2019.pdf.
Trechter, D. D., King, R. P., & Walsh, L. (2002). Using communications to influence member commitment in cooperatives. Journal of Cooperatives, 17,14-32.
Vargas-Prieto, A. (2014). La crisis de identidad de las cooperativas agrarias en Francia. Coopera- tivismo & Desarrollo, 22(105), 31-46.
Zylbersztajn, D. (2002). Quatro estratégias fundamentais para cooperativas agrícolas. In: M. J. Braga, & B. S. Reis (Orgs.). Agronegócio cooperativo: estruturação e estratégias (Vol. A281). Universidade Federal de Viçosa.




