Notes for a solidarity political economy
Purpose: This article proposes an analytical and critical view of some components of solidarity economy, primarily understood as an activity aimed at the “reproduction of life”. Description: Conceptions that are not coherent with this core of meaning are discussed, while sources that may supplement or strengthen this view are addressed. Point of view: Solidarity economy, understood as the social process that enables reproduction of life, should be assumed multi-dimensionally. In it several elements that allow us to imagine the complex process that involves such vital activity converge, and it is nourished by aspects such as the Andean thought and its rich, deep value network, which lays out principles like relatedness, correspondence, complementarity and reciprocity. Conclusions: Solidarity economy, as opposed to capitalist logic, subsumes economy to life realization. Therefore, it is said that the products of solidarity economy are not only economic, but fundamentally political and cultural.
How to Cite
License
As the author of the article declares that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Cooperativismo & Desarrollo before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Aguilar, Maritza, et al. 2000. Economía Popular de Solidaridad. Instituto Cooperativo Interamericano ICI, Panamá.
Álvarez, Freddy. “EL BUEN VIVIR UN PARADIGMA ANTICAPITALISTA” En: http://www.rebelion.org/docs/163836.pdf Acceso, febrero de 2015.
Bragulat, Jorge. 2013. “Distintas doctrinas de la Economía Social”. UNTREF.
Bosch, Ana, et al. S/A. “Verde que te quiero violeta. Encuentros y desencuentros entre el ecologismo y el feminismo”.
Cáceres, Milton. Conferencia magistral dictada en el marco del Congreso de Estudiantes de Sociología. 2014. Escuela de Sociología. Universidad de Cuenca.
Cascardo, Florencia y Pablo Levinton. 2013. “Principales Aspectos del Pensamiento Económico: Teorías del valor, del salario y de la Ganancia”. UNTREF.
Coraggio, J. (2002). La economía social como vía para otro desarrollo social. Documento prepara-do para el lanzamiento del debate sobre “Distin-tas propuestas de Economía Social”. En urbared, Red de Políticas sociales 2002. Recuperado de www.urbared.ungs.edu.ar
Estermann, José. (s. f.). Equilibrio y cuidado: concepción indígena de una comunidad solidaria y diaconal. En M. de la Torre y R. Zwetsch (eds), Diaconía y solidaridad desde los pueblos indíge-nas (pp. 126-139). Sao Leopoldo: Synodal/est/cetela.
Kowii, A. (s. f.) El Sumak Kawsay. Naciones Unidas. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/El%20Sumak%20Kawsay-Ari-rumaKowii.pdf
Presidencia de la República de Ecuador. (2011, abril). La ley orgánica de economía popular y solidaria(loeps). Quito:Organización de Estados Ameri-canos. Disponible en: http://www.oas.org/juridi-co/PDFs/mesicic4_ecu_econ.pdf
Macas, L. (2010). Sumak Kawsay. Instituto Científico de Culturas Indígenas. Recuperado de http://icci.nativeweb.org/yachaikuna/Yachaykuna13.pdf
Martín-Barbero, J. (1987). La comunicación desde la cultura Crisis de lo nacional y emergencia de lo popular. Alternatividad Latinoamericana, Comu-nicação e sociedade, 6, 42-50.
Páez, J. (2012). El “interés propio”, en la economía. Opiniones e Ideas. Recuperado de http://www.opinioneideas.org
Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero. [untref].(2014). Curso Economía Social, Popular y So-lidaria y Cooperativismo. “Las asociaciones civiles: características distintivas”. Argentina:Universidad Nacional Tres de Febrero.
Vázquez, P. (2012). Algunas ideas acerca de inves-tigaciones que pueden contribuir al diseño de políticas públicas orientadas al desarrollo de la economía popular y solidaria. Quito: iaen.
