Nanoentrepreneurship within the framework of Industry 5.0
an analysis based on the qualitative case study method
Nano-entrepreneurships are businesses operated by individuals known as nano-entrepreneurs, who serve as pivotal actors within the Industry 5.0 framework. In contrast to traditional nano-entrepreneurs, schumpeterian nano-entrepreneurs are characterized by their adaptability, resilience in the face of environmental challenges, commitment to sustainability, and their capacity to foster cooperative relationships. This paper aims to analyze the integration of the schumpeterian nano-entrepreneur into Industry 5.0, conceptualized as a system rooted in cooperative relationships. To achieve this objective, we propose a theoretical-conceptual model referred to as the Nano-entrepreneur System, which seeks to identify the categories that connect the schumpeterian nano-entrepreneur to this context. Additionally, a qualitative case study is conducted in the city of Toluca, State of Mexico. The findings indicate that, although schumpeterian nano-entrepreneurships are managed by a single individual, they embody fundamental values aligned with the principles of the Social and Solidarity Economy, including collaboration and a commitment to generating social and economic impact.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cooperativismo & Desarrollo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As the author of the article declares that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.
In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Cooperativismo & Desarrollo before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.
At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.
Alvarado, E., Morales, D., & Ortíz, J. (2021). Emprendimiento de nanoempresas en el empoderamiento de mujeres neolonesas. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 82(4), 863-895.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Audretsch, D., Cruz, M., & Torres, J. (2022). Revisiting Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. World Bank Group.
Ávila, E. (2021). La evolución del concepto emprendimiento y su relación con la innovación y el conocimiento. Revista Investigación y Negocios, 14(23). https://doi.org/10.38147/invneg.v16i28
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Barata, J., & Kayser, I. (2023). Industry 5.0. Past, present and near future. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 778-788.
Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric, and resilient European industry. European Commission.
Canales, R., Román, Y., & Ovando, W. (2017). Emprendimiento en la población joven. Una perspectiva crítica. Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, 5(12), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21933/J.EDSC.2017.12.211
Canales, R., & Montiel, O. (2022). True entrepreneur versus false entrepreneur: Implications for family business. En O. J. Montiel, S. Tomaselli, & A. S. Maciel (Eds.), Family Business Debates (pp. 327-349). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-666-820221017
Canales García, R. A. (2023). Instituciones y emprendimiento en el marco del desarrollo endógeno: Hacia la conformación de un marco teórico para América Latina. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 25(3), 992-1013.
Carro, J., & Sarmiento, S. (2022). El factor humano y su rol en la transición a Industria 5.0: Una revisión sistemática y perspectivas futuras. Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, 10(24). https://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2022.24.81727
Duarte, A., Kok, S., O'Brien, S., & Geneste, L. (2020). Understanding entrepreneurial deviance through social learning and entrepreneurial action theory: An empirical study. European Business Review, 32(4), 643-666.
Fong, C., Flores, K., & Cardoza, L. (2017). La teoría de los recursos y capacidades: Un análisis bibliométrico. Nova Scientia, 9(19), 411-440.
García, J., & Mendoza, L. (2023). El impacto de la Industria y Sociedad 5.0 en la educación. Uno Sapiens: Boletín Científico de la Escuela Preparatoria, 5(10), 15-18. https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/prepa1/article/view/10387
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Institute of International and European Affairs.
Langroodi, F. (2021). Schumpeter’s theory of economic development: A study of the creative destruction and entrepreneurship effects on economic growth. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 4(3), 65-81.
McClelland, D. (1961). The Achieving Society. The Free Press.
Mehmood, T., Alzoubi, H., Alshideh, M., & Al-Gasaymeh, A. (2019). Schumpeterian entrepreneurship theory: Evolution and relevance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(4).
Ovalles, L., Moreno, Z., Olivares, M., & Silva, H. (2018). Habilidades y capacidades del emprendimiento: Un estudio bibliométrico. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 23(81), 271-234.
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: Teoría y práctica. Ediciones Morata.
Través, A., & Villafuente, C. (2023). Industria 5.0: Revisión del pasado y futuro de la producción y la industria. Ciencia Latina: Revista Multidisciplinar, 7. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i1.4457
Terán, E., & Guerrero, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: Revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41(7).
Villalba, E., & Ortega, R. (2019). Aproximación a las características emprendedoras del gestor universitario. ARANDU-UTIC: Revista Científica Internacional, 6(1), 145-162.
Wünsch, A., & Araujo, L. (2020). Case study research: Opening un research opportunities. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(1), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0109
