A sustentabilidade financeira do ensino superior
os desafios do ensino superior privado num contexto de rápidas mudanças
Este texto analisa questões-chave da sustentabilidade financeira no ensino superior, com foco particular nos desafios e pressões específicos enfrentados pelas universidades privadas. Esses desafios incluem fatores relacionados à demanda, como mudanças demográficas e a reformulação do ensino superior como um bem privado e um investimento individual. Examinará também como as mudanças nas condições regulatórias influenciaram o acesso institucional a diversas fontes de financiamento, especialmente em um contexto de crescente competição dentro do ensino superior privado e entre instituições públicas e privadas, devido à diluição das fronteiras entre elas. Será dada especial atenção aos desafios organizacionais associados a uma estratégia de sustentabilidade financeira baseada em uma base de receita diversificada. Isso abrangerá questões que vão desde a cultura e governança organizacional até os mecanismos internos de recompensa e a capacidade de desenvolver planos estratégicos e financeiros coerentes, tudo isso enquanto as instituições precisam gerenciar múltiplas fontes de financiamento. A análise também enfatizará a importância de equilibrar as prioridades acadêmicas e administrativas para mitigar potenciais tensões e aprimorar a coesão interna e o alinhamento com a missão. Portanto, a análise se concentrará mais em questões organizacionais e de cumprimento da missão do que em gestão financeira. Este estudo também considerará essas questões no contexto das rápidas mudanças tecnológicas e econômicas que potencialmente desafiam a relevância do ensino superior e introduzem maior incerteza para as instituições de ensino superior. A análise abordará especificamente os desafios enfrentados pelo ensino superior privado. Embora grande parte da expansão recente do ensino superior privado tenha sido caracterizada por um padrão de absorção da demanda, esse tipo de expansão não constitui uma estratégia de desenvolvimento sustentável. Em cenários pós-massificação, as instituições privadas devem se posicionar como uma alternativa ao sistema público, e não como uma segunda opção para aqueles que não conseguiram acessá-lo. Além disso, as instituições de ensino superior privadas devem se envolver muito mais em atividades de pesquisa, seja como estratégia para fortalecer sua qualidade acadêmica, diversificar sua base de financiamento ou fomentar parcerias com partes interessadas externas. Essas transformações apresentam desafios institucionais significativos e exigem atenção especial às dimensões de pessoal e organizacional para se tornarem mais atraentes para potenciais alunos, financiadores e outras partes interessadas externas.
Como Citar
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Rastros Rostros
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ética. La revista y su equipo editorial propiciarán, a través de sus políticas y actuaciones, la ética en los procesos de investigación, el uso apropiado de los contenidos protegidos por derechos de autor y la calidad de los trabajos que publica, de manera que los diferentes colaboradores (editores, autores y evaluadores) interactúen bajo principios de integridad académica.
- Autores. Se espera que los autores que participen en la revista presenten textos originales, de su propia creación, derivados de procesos de investigación rigurosos, que no hayan sido previamente publicados, usen de manera adecuada las fuentes que sirven de soporte bibliográfico y cualquier otro material que esté protegido por derechos de autor. Los textos también deben estar escritos de manera cuidadosa y considerando los requisitos de forma y citación que correspondan al estilo de la revista.
- Evaluadores. Se espera que los evaluadores de la revista realicen una lectura minuciosa y constructiva de cada artículo que acepten revisar, buscando no sólo emitir una recomendación de aprobación o rechazo para el editor, sino que sus comentarios permitan que los autores mejoren sus textos o reflexionen sobre los alcances, posibilidades o falencias de su manuscrito. Asimismo, los evaluadores deben considerar que los textos que el editor les ha confiado son inéditos, y cualquier uso indebido o no autorizado de la información allí contenida implicaría una falta ética grave. También, la responsabilidad de evaluar un trabajo, una vez se ha aceptado, no puede ser transferida a terceros, en especial, si no se ha justificado y consultado previamente con el editor. Finalmente, cualquier conflicto de intereses que el evaluador identifique después de haber recibido un trabajo y que potencialmente menoscabe su independencia en la elaboración de un concepto debe informarse.
Notificación sobre casos. Si hay alguna evidencia de problemas éticos en las investigaciones que presentan los trabajos publicados por la revista, dudas sobre su rigor científico, sospecha de falsificación o manipulación indebida de datos, conflictos de intereses no revelados, identificación de publicaciones previas (“refritos”), problemas de autoría o plagio, pedimos, por favor, que se contacte de manera inmediata al editor de la revista para que pueda ahondar en el caso y tomar las acciones que correspondan. Las notificaciones que se reciban sobre problemas éticos se manejarán con absoluta confidencialidad, protegiendo la identidad de la persona que ha detectado el problema, si así lo solicita.
Retractaciones, correcciones y resolución de conflictos. La revista sigue los lineamientos (http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines) y procedimientos (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts) del Committee on Publication Ethics (cope) para el manejo de conductas inapropiadas en la publicación académica. Asimismo, se harán retractaciones o correcciones de artículos ya publicados cuyos contenidos presenten errores que afecten su calidad científica o el reconocimiento apropiado de sus autores, ya sea por equivocaciones involuntarias en el proceso de investigación y publicación o por problemas éticos serios como plagio, falsificaciones, manipulaciones de datos, entre otros.
Uso de los contenidos y autoarchivo. La revista publica sus contenidos en acceso abierto, sin que medie ningún periodo de embargo. Asimismo, todos los trabajos publicados aparecen bajo una licencia Creative Commons de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), y su uso debe hacerse bajo esas condiciones de licenciamiento.
Alstete, J. W. (2020). Revenue Generation, Higher Education Institutions. In: Teixeira, P. N., Shin, J. C. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_536
Altbach, P., & Balán, J. (2004). World-class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, P. G. (ed.). (1999). Private Prometheus: Private Higher Education and Development in the 21st Century. Greenwood Publishing, Westport, CT.
Aoun, J. (2018). Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11456.001.0001
Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2010). Why does college cost so much? Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744503.001.0001
Autor, D. (2019). “Work of the Past, Work of the Future.” American Economic Review – AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191110
Barr, N. (2011). Economics of the Welfare State (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Barr, N., & Crawford, I. (2005). Financing Higher Education – Answers from the UK. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203321515
Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace. Princeton University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). “Generative AI at Work.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044
Callender, C. (2006). “Access to Higher Education in Britain: the impact of tuition fees and financial assistance,” in Teixeira et al. (2006).
Chapman, B., & Doan, D. (2019). “Financing higher education: Concepts, empirical methods, and international policy reforms.” Economics of Education Review, 71, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.04.001
Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). “Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross-National Analysis of University Ranking Systems.” Higher Education, 49(4), 495–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8
Drezner, N. D., & Huehls, F. (2014). Fundraising and institutional advancement: Theory, practice, and new paradigms. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123850
Fanelli, A. G. (2020). “Public funding, Latin America.” In J. Shin & P. Teixeira (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer.
Felten, E. W., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). Occupational Heterogeneity in Exposure to Generative AI. SSRN Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4414065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4414065
Fincher, M., & Katsinas, S. (2017). “Testing the limits of the price elasticity of potential students at colleges and universities: Has the increased direct cost to the student begun to drive down higher education enrolment?” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 31–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1211975
Geiger, R. (1986). Private Sectors in Higher Education. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7381
Geiger, R. L., & Sá, C. M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science: universities and the promise of economic growth. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv22jntdm
Geiger, R. (2004). Knowledge and Money. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804767330
Getz, M., & Siegfried, J. (1991). “Costs and Productivity in American Colleges and Universities,” in Clotfelter, C., Ehrenberg, R., Getz, M., & Siegfried, J. (eds.), Economic Challenges in Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER, 286–331.
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2008). The Race between Education and Technology. MIT Press.
Gumport, P. (2001). “Built to Serve: the Enduring Legacy of Public Higher Education,” in Altbach, P., Gumport, P., & Johnstone, B. (eds.), In Defense of American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 85–109.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029179.001.0001
Herbst, M. (2006). Financing public universities. Higher Education Dynamics, 18. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5560-7
Huisman, J., & Currie, J. (2004). “Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water?” Higher Education, 48, 529–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046725.16936.4c
Johnstone, B., & Marcucci, P. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: Who pays? Who should pay? The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jongbloed, B. (2020). “Formula funding in higher education.” In P. Teixeira & J. Shin (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_65
Kaiser, F., Vossensteyn, H., & Koelman, J. (2001). Public funding of higher education. A comparative study of funding mechanisms in ten countries. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.
Kinser, K. (2020). “For-profit higher education.” In P. Teixeira & J. Shin (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_105
Koryakina, T. (2020). Revenue Diversification, Higher Education. In: Teixeira, P. N., Shin, J. C. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_67
Le Grand, J. (2006). Motivation, agency, and public policy: Of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford University Press.
Levy, D. (2020). “Private Higher Education.” In: Teixeira, P. N., Shin, J. C. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_28
Levy, D. C. (1986). Higher Education and the State in Latin America: Private Challenges to Public Dominance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levy, D. C. (1996). Building the Third Sector: Latin America’s Private Research Centers and Nonprofit Development. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12348147
Levy, D. C. (2002). “Unanticipated Development: Perspectives on Private Higher Education’s Emerging Roles.” PROPHE (Program for Research on Private Higher Education) Working Paper.
Levy, D. C. (2006). “An Introductory Global Overview: The Private Fit to Salient Higher Education Tendencies.” PROPHE Working Paper, No. 7.
Looney, A., & Yannelis, C. (2018). Borrowers with Large Balances: Rising Student Debt and Falling Repayment Rates. The Brookings Institution.
Marginson, S. (2016). “The Worldwide Trend toward Higher Participation in Higher Education: Dynamics of Social Stratification in Inclusive Systems.” Higher Education, 72, 413–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (eds.). (1996). The Mockers and the Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence, and Diversity in Higher Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Morphew, C., & Eckel, P. (eds.). (2009). Privatizing the Public University – Perspectives from across the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801891649
Morrison, C., & Murtin, F. (2009). “The Century of Education.” Journal of Human Capital, 3(1), 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/600102
Neave, G. (2012). The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-engineering Higher Education in Western Europe. London: Palgrave/MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370227
Neave, G., & Van Vught, F. (eds.). (1994). Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change. Pergamon Press.
Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (eds.). (2009). Structuring Mass Higher Education: The Role of Elite Institutions. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. Oxford University Press.
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). “Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature.” Education Economics, 26(5), 445–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426
Regini, M. (2011). European Universities and the Challenge of the Market: A Comparative Analysis. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849808637.00014
Skolnik, M. L. (2020). “Financial Sustainability in Higher Education.” In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (eds.). (2011). Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846162
Teichler, U. (1988). Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System: The Experience of Three Decades. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Teixeira, P. (2016). “Private Higher Education.” In Rethinking the Public–Private Mix in Higher Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-911-9_1
Teixeira, P. (2009). “Economic imperialism and the ivory tower: Economic issues and policy challenges in the funding of higher education in the EHEA (2010–2020).” In J. Huisman, B. Stensaker, & B. M. Kehm (eds.), The European Higher Education Area: Perspectives on a Moving Target, 43–60. Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907143_004
Teixeira, P., & Koryakina, T. (2013). “Funding reforms and revenue diversification – patterns, challenges and rhetoric.” Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 174–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.573844
Teixeira, P., Biscaia, R., Rocha, V., & Cardoso, M. F. (2016). “What role for private higher education in Europe – Reflecting about current patterns and prospects.” In M. Shah & C. S. Nair (eds.), A Global Perspective on Private Higher Education. Elsevier & Chandos Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100872-0.00002-1
Teixeira, P., Rocha, V., Biscaia, R., & Cardoso, M. F. (2014). “Policy Changes, Marketization Trends and Spatial Dispersion in European Higher Education: Comparing Public and Private Sectors.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 271–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst027
Teixeira, P., Sunwoong, K., Zulfiqar, G., & Landoni, P. (2016). The Changing Public–Private Mix in Higher Education – Patterns, Rationales and Challenges. Rotterdam: Sense. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-911-9_8
Teixeira, P., Dill, D., Jongbloed, B., & Amaral, A. (eds.). (2004). Reality or Rhetoric? The Rising Strength of Markets in Higher Education. Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2835-0
Teixeira, P., Johnstone, D. B., Rosa, M. J., & Vossensteyn, J. J. (2006). A Fairer Deal? Cost-sharing and Accessibility in Western Higher Education. Springer–Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4660-X
Toutkoushian, R. K., & Lee, J. C. (2018). “Revisiting economies of scale and scope in higher education.” In M. Paulsen (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 371–416. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_8
Van Vught, F. (ed.). (1989). Governmental Strategies and Innovations in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Weisbrod, B., Ballou, J., & Asch, E. (2008). Mission and Money: Understanding the University. Cambridge University Press.
Wells, P. J., Sadlak, J., & Vlăsceanu, L. (eds.). (2007). The Rising Role and Relevance of Private Higher Education in Europe. UNESCO–CEPES, Bucharest.
Winston, G. C. (1999). “Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.13.1.13
