Confiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que mide siete dimensiones de la percepción de seguridad en estudiantes de una universidad pública

Javier Carreón Guillén; Cruz García Lirios; Felipe de Jesús Vilchis Mora; Joel Martínez Bello; Rigoberto Sánchez Rosales; Lorena Damaris Quintana Alonso

doi:10.16925/pe.v12i20.1564

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument that Measures Seven Dimensions of Security Perception in Students from a Public University

Original Research Articles

https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v12i20.1564

Javier Carreón Guillén Ver Biografía

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Cruz García Lirios Ver Biografía

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Felipe de Jesús Vilchis Mora Ver Biografía

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Joel Martínez Bello Ver Biografía

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Rigoberto Sánchez Rosales Ver Biografía

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Lorena Damaris Quintana Alonso Ver Biografía

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

Introduction: Public security management involves the implementation of public policies that justify the guidance of the State in the prevention of crime and the administration of justice. However, citizen distrust of government action is evidenced by a growing insecurity perception reported by the literature in seven dimensions: territorial, national, public, human, citizen, private and Internet user.

Objective: To establish reliability and validity of an instrument that measures the perception of territorial, national, public, human, citizen, private, and Internet user security.

Method: Non-experimental, cross-sectional, exploratory study with a non-probabilistic selection of 320 students from a public university.

Results: Reliability of the overall scale (alpha = 0.793), and territorial (alpha = 0.792), national (alpha = 0.709), public (alpha = 0.785), human (alpha = 0.782), citizen (alpha = 0.792), private (alpha = 0.794), and Internet user (alpha = 0.731) subscales, show sufficient internal consistency. The territorial security factor accounted for 22% of total variance. Based on adjustment and residual parameters ⌠χ2 = 135.34 (32 gl) p = 0.054; GFI = 0.995; CFI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.003⌡, the null hypothesis of significant relationship among theoretical dimensions of security with respect to factors weighted was accepted.

Conclusions: Inclusion and measurement of a dimension of self-control perception that would negatively and significantly correlate with the perception of territorial security would explain the factorial structure of the scale. Such model would be estimated by a confirmatory factorial analysis with unweighted least squares.

Keywords: biopower, risk perception, psychometry, security

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.

Calabrese, A. (2004). Virtual nonviolence? Civil desobedience and political violence in the information age. Emerald, 6(5), 326-338. doi: 10.1108/14636690410564834

Carreón, J., Hernández, J. y García, C. (2014). Prueba empírica de un modelo de establecimiento de agenda. Acta Universitaria, 24(3), 50-62 doi: 10.15174.au.2014.598

Durán, M. y Martínez, R. (2015). Ciberacoso mediante teléfono móvil e Internet en las relaciones de noviazgo entre jóvenes. Comunicar, 44(22), 159-167. doi: 10.3916/C44-2015-17]

Fishbein, M. y Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

García, C. (2007). El problema de la sustentabilidad. Perspectivas en Psicología, 3(1), 141-150.

García, C. (2012). La estructura de la percepción de inseguridad pública. Liberabit, 18(1), 37-44.

García, C., Carreón, J., Hernández, J., Aguilar, J., Rosas, F., Morales, L. y García, E. (2015). Gobernanza de la vida sociopolítica. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 13, 77-80.

García, C., Montero, M., Bustos, J., Carreón, J. y Hernández, J. (2013). La inseguridad migratoria en los medios impresos de la Ciudad de México. Reflexiones, 92(1), 159-173.

Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kesperson, J. y Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187.

Osorio, J. (2012). Estado, biopoder y exclusión. Análisis desde la lógica del capital. Barcelona: Anthropos.

Sherman, G. y Haidt, J. (2011). Cutenes and disgust: the humanizing and deshumanizing effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 3(3), 1-7. doi: 10.1177/1754073911402396

Sung, W. (2015). A study of ciberbullyng policies in the smart age. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 117, 15-20. doi: 10.14257/astl. 2015.117.04

Vega, J. (2010). La seguridad pública en la era moderna y contemporánea. Ciudad de México: UAM-I

Weaber, D. (2007). Thougths on agenda setting, framing and priming. Journal of Communication, 7, 142-147.

doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x

Carreón Guillén, J., García Lirios, C., Vilchis Mora, F. de J., Martínez Bello, J., Sánchez Rosales, R., & Quintana Alonso, L. D. (2016). Reliability and Validity of an Instrument that Measures Seven Dimensions of Security Perception in Students from a Public University. Pensando Psicología, 12(20), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v12i20.1564

Download Citation

As the author of the article, I declare that is an original unpublished work exclusively created by me, that it has not been submitted for simultaneous evaluation by another publication and that there is no impediment of any kind for concession of the rights provided for in this contract.

In this sense, I am committed to await the result of the evaluation by the journal Pensando Psicología before considering its submission to another medium; in case the response by that publication is positive, additionally, I am committed to respond for any action involving claims, plagiarism or any other kind of claim that could be made by third parties.

At the same time, as the author or co-author, I declare that I am completely in agreement with the conditions presented in this work and that I cede all patrimonial rights, in other words, regarding reproduction, public communication, distribution, dissemination, transformation, making it available and all forms of exploitation of the work using any medium or procedure, during the term of the legal protection of the work and in every country in the world, to the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Press.

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 20 (2016)

Published

2016-10-01

Downloads

PDF (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.16925/pe.v12i20.1564