• Research Reflection Articles

    Fundamentals of the Bioecological Theory of Urie Bronfenbrenner

    Vol. 9 No. 16 (2013)
    Published: 2013-12-15
    Idonézia Collodel Benetti
    Mauro Luis Vieira
    Maria Aparecida Crepaldi
    Daniela Ribeiro Schneider

    This theoretical research focuses on the following aspects of the Bioecological Theory of Human Development, designed by Urie Bronfenbrenner: a) origins of his proposals, b) ontological bases, c) epistemological bases, d) anthropological point of view, and e) application of the theory - the method and techniques used in research in that particular scientific field. The article was written because of the difficulty of finding scientific writings that address all of these aspects in one single work. It attempts to reveal what is hidden and/or diluted in the scientific discourse underlying the writings of Bronfenbrenner and in a simple and didactic manner to deal with the essential elements needed for a critical understanding of the theory in question.

    Keywords: Array, Array, Array, Array, Array

    How to Cite

    Collodel Benetti, I., Vieira, M. L., Crepaldi, M. A., & Ribeiro Schneider, D. (2013). Fundamentals of the Bioecological Theory of Urie Bronfenbrenner. Pensando Psicología, 9(16), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v9i16.620

    Bargal, D., Gold, M. y Lewin, M. (1992). Introduction: The Heritage of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 3-13.

    Blackburn, S. & Marcondes, D. (1997). Consultoria da edição brasileira. Em Marcondes, D., Dicionário Oxford de filosofía. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. Em Wozniak, R. & Fischer, K. (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44).Hillsdale-NJ: Erlbaum.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. Em Moen, P., Elder Jr, G. H. & Lüscher, K. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647).Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). A ecologia do desenvolvimento humano: experimentos naturais e planejados. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. California: Sage Publications.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A biological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568-586. Bronfenbrenner, U. & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115-125.

    Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. Em Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M.(Eds.). Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (993-1028). New York: John Wiley.

    Ceci, S. J. (2006). Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917-2005). American Psychology. 61(2), 173-174.

    Corraliza, J. A., Blanco, A. & Loeches, A. (1987). Entrevista a Urie Bronfrenbrenner. Estudios de Psicología, 27(28), 3-22.

    Fonseca, A. M. (2007). Subsídios para uma leitura desenvolvimental do processo de envelhecimento. Psicologia, Reflexão e Crítica, 20(2), 277-289.

    Gamboa, S. S. (2011). Os projetos de pesquisa: alguns fundamentos lógicos necessários. Em Miranda, E. & Bryan, N. P.(Eds.), (Re)pensar la educación pública: aportes desde Argentina y Brasil (121-150). Córdoba: Ed. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

    Johnson, E. S. (2008). Ecological Systems and Complexity Theory: Toward an Alternative Model of Accountability in Education, Complicity, 5(1), 1-10.

    Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theories and applications. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Marconi, M. A. & Presotto, Z. M. N. (2006). Antropologia: uma introdução. São Paulo: Atlas.

    Masson, G. (2007). Materialismo histórico e dialético: uma discussão sobre as categorias centrais. Praxis Educativa, 2(2), 105-114.

    Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W. y Feldman, R. D. (1975). A child’s world – infancy through adolescence. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

    Polonia, A.C, Dessen, M.A. y Silva, N.L.P. (2005). O modelo bioecológico de Bronfenbrenner: contribuições para o desenvolvimento humano. Em Dessen, M.A. y Junior, A.C. A ciência do desenvolvimento humano: tendências atuais e perspectivas futuras (71-89). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

    Prati, E. P., Couto, M. C. P. P., Moura, A. Polleto, M. y Koller, S. H. (2008). Revisando a inserção ecológica: uma proposta de sistematização. Psicologia, reflexão e crítica, 21(1), 160-169.

    Schwandt, Thomas A. (1994). Construtivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. Em: Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. EUA: Sage.

    Toren, C. (2012). Antropologia e psicologia. Rev. bras. Ci. Soc., 20(80), 21-36.

    Tudge, J. (2008). A teoria de Urie Bronfenbrenner: uma teoria contextualista? Em Moreira, L. V. C. y Carvalho, A. M. A. (Eds.), Família e educação: Olhares da psicologia (pp. 209–231). São Paulo: Paulinas.

    Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society:The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Zuñiga, L. C. M. (2010). Apuntes sobre epistemología e investigación en la enseñanza de los Estudios Sociales. Revista Educación, 34(2), 61-74.

    Wormer, K. V. (2007). Human behavior and the social environment: Micro Level. New York: Oxford University Press.

    MÉTRICAS
    ARTICLE VIEWS: 49157
    PDF VIEWS: 42367